| Literature DB >> 26516881 |
Chen-Fa Wu1, Yen-Fen Hsieh2, Sheng-Jung Ou3.
Abstract
Thermal adaptation studies provide researchers great insight to help understand how people respond to thermal discomfort. This research aims to assess outdoor urban plaza conditions in hot and humid regions of Asia by conducting an evaluation of thermal adaptation. We also propose that questionnaire items are appropriate for determining thermal adaptation strategies adopted by urban plaza users. A literature review was conducted and first hand data collected by field observations and interviews used to collect information on thermal adaptation strategies. Item analysis--Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)--were applied to refine the questionnaire items and determine the reliability of the questionnaire evaluation procedure. The reliability and validity of items and constructing process were also analyzed. Then, researchers facilitated an evaluation procedure for assessing the thermal adaptation strategies of urban plaza users in hot and humid regions of Asia and formulated a questionnaire survey that was distributed in Taichung's Municipal Plaza in Taiwan. Results showed that most users responded with behavioral adaptation when experiencing thermal discomfort. However, if the thermal discomfort could not be alleviated, they then adopted psychological strategies. In conclusion, the evaluation procedure for assessing thermal adaptation strategies and the questionnaire developed in this study can be applied to future research on thermal adaptation strategies adopted by urban plaza users in hot and humid regions of Asia.Entities:
Keywords: coping; qualitative method; thermal adaptation; thermal comfort
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26516881 PMCID: PMC4627049 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121013560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Study site for thermal adaptation strategies adopted by urban plaza users in hot and humid Asia.
Thermal adaptation strategies adopted by urban plaza users in hot and humid Asia.
| No. | Items | Description | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Personal choice | More tolerable because of choice to be exposed to the environment. | Nikolopoulou, 2004 [ |
| 2 | Expectations | Expects the temperature to change to make it more acceptable. | Cao |
| 3 | Habituation | Diminished feelings due to repeated or long-term exposure to environmental stress. | Brager & de Dear, 1998 [ |
| 4 | Perceived control | Reduce negative emotional responses by controlling perception of dislike. | Folkman & Lazarus, 1988 [ |
| 5 | Past Experience | Recent temperatures help make the environment more acceptable. | Humphreys, 1975 [ |
| 6 | Complaining | Feels more comfortable and bearable after complaining. | Carver |
| 7 | Naturalness | Viewing it as a natural occurrence makes the wide range of physical environment tolerable. | Nikolopoulou & Steemers, 2003 [ |
| 8 | Time of exposure | Short exposure time makes it tolerable. | Nikolopoulou & Steemers, 2003 [ |
| 9 | Environmental stimulation | People enjoy the environmental incentive, such as the sunshine, wind, and fresh air. | Nikolopoulou & Steemers, 2003 [ |
| 10 | Product transfer | Redefine the experience or change the level of experience, such as: recreating in such weather being a different kind of experience. | Kao, 2007 [ |
| 11 | Rationalization | Convince self that it is not too stressful such as by viewing the weather as a given. | Kao, 2007 [ |
| 12 | Mental disengagement | Not thinking about the discomfort makes it tolerable. | Amirkhan, 1990 [ |
| 13 | Distraction | Focusing on the activities makes it tolerable. | Billings & Moos, 1984 [ |
| 14 | Endurance 2 | Just endure. | Dise-Lewis, 1988 [ |
| 15 | Naive optimism | Positive, optimistic thinking makes it acceptable. | Epstein & Meier, 1989 [ |
| 16 | Negative thinking | There is nothing one can do about the bad weather or discomfort. | Epstein & Meier, 1989 [ |
| 17 | Wishful thinking | Thinking that maybe the weather will turn comfortable. | Folkman & Lazarus, 1985 [ |
| 18 | Confrontive * | Face it and endure. | Folkman & Lazarus, 1988 [ |
| 19 | Seeking spiritual support | Tell a friend about it, and get his/her encouragement. | Amirkhan, 1990 [ |
| 20 | Seeking professional support | Ask others about ways to be more comfortable. | Patterson & McCubbin, 1987 [ |
| 21 | Being humorous | Relax and face the weather with humor. | Patterson & McCubbin, 1987 [ |
| 22 | Relaxing | Relax and calm down. | Patterson & McCubbin, 1987 [ |
| 23 | Adjusting clothing(Clothing, hair, hat, umbrella) | Use clothing to adjust to the wide range of weather changes. | Brager & de Dear, 1998 [ |
| 24 | Adjustment of activities | Modify personal activities to adapt to the hot environment. | Brager & de Dear, 1998 [ |
| 25 | Adjust the posture | Modify personal posture to adapt to the hot environment. | Brager & de Dear, 1998 [ |
| 26 | Adjust your diet(Eating/ drinking hot/ cold food or beverages) | Consume hot or cold food or beverages to adapt to the hot environment. | Brager & de Dear, 1998 [ |
| 27 | Move inside(To shade) | When the temperature becomes uncomfortable, relocate activity to a more comfortable place. | Kao, 2007 [ |
| 28 | Outside displace(Back to the room, quickly through) | Find a place with a more comfortable temperature for the activity. | Kao, 2007 [ |
| 29 | Time displace | If temperature becomes uncomfortable, select another more comfortable time for the activity. | Kao, 2007 [ |
| 30 | Leaving a space | Leave and go to a more comfortable place. | Carver |
| 31 | Fan | Use a hand fan during hot weather. | Lin, T. P., & Lin, Y. T., 2007 [ |
| 32 | Sunglasses | Wear sunglasses if the sun feels too strong. | Field interviews |
| 33 | Reduce the time to stay | If temperature becomes uncomfortable at the location, shorten the activity time. | Field interviews |
| 34 | Take a deep breath | Take a deep breathe to feel more comfortable. | Field interviews |
| 35 | Sunbathe | When the weather is cold, go out into the sunshine. | Field interviews |
Notes: Field interviews means users were interviewed on their thermal adaptation strategies in Taichung’s Municipal Plaza. Assessment by scholars in related fields indicate that these items have a high degree of similarity, and are therefore combined.
Figure 2Establishing the thermal adaptation evaluation procedure of urban plaza users in hot and humid Asia.
Results of exploratory factor analysis of behavioral adaptation to the thermal environment of urban plaza.
| Behavioral Adaptation Strategies to the Thermal Environment of Urban Plaza | Mean | Behavioral Adaption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Displace-Oriented Behavior | Material-Aided Behavior | Metabolism-Related Behavior | ||
| Move inside (to shade) | 4.02 | 0.784 | 0.345 | 0.286 |
| Move outside (back to the room, quickly move through area) | 3.85 | 0.761 | 0.302 | 0.143 |
| Adjustment of activities | 3.93 | 0.682 | 0.443 | 0.414 |
| Time displacement | 3.61 | 0.678 | 0.349 | 0.213 |
| Fan | 3.96 | 0.311 | 0.820 | 0.135 |
| Adjusting clothing (clothing, hair, hat, umbrella) | 3.94 | 0.405 | 0.809 | 0.332 |
| Sunbathe | 4.01 | 0.411 | 0.623 | 0.335 |
| Take a deep breath | 3.44 | 0.232 | 0.257 | 0.893 |
| Adjust the posture | 3.59 | 0.338 | 0.297 | 0.889 |
| Eigenvalue | 3.310 | 1.269 | 0.975 | |
| Explained variance | 36.777 | 14.105 | 10.831 | |
| Cumulative explained variance | 36.777 | 50.883 | 61.714 | |
| Factors mean | 3.85 | 3.97 | 3.52 | |
| Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.779 Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.783 | ||||
Notes: 1. Sample sizes is 2076 and observations is 392 persons; 2. Thermal adaptation items were scored on a 5-point Likert Scale (“1” = strongly disagree, “5” = strongly agree); 3. Through item analysis, 4 items that received similar responses among all respondents, namely adjusting diet, leaving, wearing sunglasses and reducing staying time, and items that could not accurately and effectively identify psychological characteristics were deleted.
Results of exploratory factor analysis of psychological adaptation to the thermal environment of urban plaza.
| Psychological Adaptation Strategies to the Thermal Environment of Urban Plaza | Mean | Psychological Adaption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intro-Control | Shift | Passive Respondent | ||
| Mental disengagement | 3.05 | 0.738 | 0.496 | 0.074 |
| Environmental stimulation | 2.99 | 0.725 | 0.512 | 0.226 |
| Habituation | 3.26 | 0.719 | 0.325 | 0.367 |
| Perceived control | 2.99 | 0.703 | 0.391 | 0.102 |
| Endurance and confrontive | 3.24 | 0.652 | 0.463 | 0.412 |
| Rationalization | 3.34 | 0.633 | 0.511 | 0.415 |
| Past Experience | 3.21 | 0.600 | 0.401 | 0.338 |
| Distraction | 3.65 | 0.417 | 0.821 | 0.243 |
| Relaxing | 3.57 | 0.445 | 0.811 | 0.230 |
| Product transfer | 3.28 | 0.565 | 0.757 | 0.193 |
| Naive optimism | 3.57 | 0.534 | 0.745 | 0.373 |
| Wishful thinking | 3.35 | 0.358 | 0.475 | 0.105 |
| Time of exposure | 3.12 | 0.247 | 0.280 | 0.776 |
| Negative thinking | 3.32 | 0.255 | 0.166 | 0.754 |
| Eigenvalue | 5.218 | 1.186 | 1.051 | |
| Explained variance | 37.274 | 8.470 | 7.507 | |
| Cumulative explained variance | 37.274 | 45.744 | 53.251 | |
| Factors mean | 3.15 | 3.48 | 3.22 | |
| Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.895 Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.862 | ||||
Note 1: Sample sizes are 2076 and observations are 392 persons; Note 2: Thermal adaptation items were scored on a 5-point Likert Scale (“1” = strongly disagree, “5” = strongly agree); Note 3: Through item analysis, 3 items that received similar responses among all respondents, namely complaining, seeking spiritual support and seeking professional support, and items that could not accurately and effectively identify psychological characteristics were deleted. Then through EFA, 4 items, namely personal choice, expectation, naturalness and being humorous were deleted because their total correlation value or standardized factor loading were too low, or because their deletion increased the total Cronbach’s Alpha; Note 4: Assessment by scholars in related fields indicated that the “enduring” and “confrontive” items have a high degree of similarity, and are therefore combined.
Figure A1Modified confirmatory factor analysis of urban plaza thermal adaptation.
Modified thermal adaptation goodness of fit.
| Fit Index | GFI | SRMR | RMSEA | NNFI | CFI | PNFI | PGFI | CN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | <3 | >0.9 | <0.08 | <0.08 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.5 | >0.5 | >200 | |
| Adaptation Factor | 363.9, | 2.51 | 0.91 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 202 |
Notes: 1. Sample sizes are 2076 and observations are 392 persons; 2. a. t-value > 1.96 (p < 0.05, denoted by *); t-value > 2.576 (p < 0.01, denoted by **); t-value > 3.291 (p < 0.001, denoted by ***).
Discriminant validity of thermal adaptation strategies.
| Latent Variable | Intro-Control | Shift | Passive Respondent | Displace-Oriented Behavior | Material-Aided Behavior | Metabolism-Related Behavior | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intro-control | 1 | ||||||
| Shift | 0.81 a | 1 | |||||
| Passive respondent | 0.85 | 0.81 | 1 | ||||
| Displace-oriented behavior | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.07 | 1 | |||
| Material-aided behavior | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 1 | ||
| Metabolism-related behavior | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.55 | 0.40 | 1 | |
Notes: Sample sizes are 2076 and observations are 392 persons; a: correlation coefficient; b: confidence intervals.
Figure 3Distribution frequency of thermal adaption strategies adopted by users of Taichung’s Municipal Plaza.
Thermal adaption questionnaire items for urban plaza users in hot and humid Asia (simplified version).
| Thermal Adaptation Construct | Thermal Adaptation Questionnaire Item |
|---|---|
| Move-oriented behavior | I will find a more comfortable place for the activity. |
| Material-aided behavior | I will add or remove articles of clothing to relief thermal discomfort (such as clothes, hat, umbrella or fan). |
| Metabolism-related behavior | I use change my body’s metabolism to relief thermal discomfort (such as taking a deep breathe or changing posture). |
| Intro-control | I will use self-control to help myself accept the thermal discomfort (such as not thinking about the discomfort or enduring the discomfort). |
| Shift | I will change my mood to help myself accept the thermal discomfort (such as positive thinking or focusing on the ongoing activity). |
| Passive respondent | I think the thermal discomfort cannot be helped, and therefore, I can only passively accept it. |
Thermal adaption questionnaire items for urban plaza users in hot and humid Asia (detailed version).
| Thermal Adaptation Variables | Thermal Adaptation Questionnaire Item |
|---|---|
| I will stay in a more comfortable place (such as a cooler or warmer place). | |
| Move outside | I will go to a more comfortable environment for recreation. |
| Fan | If the day is hot, I will use a hand fan. |
| Adjusting clothing | I will add or remove a clothing item, or tie up my hair, wear a hat, or use an umbrella. |
| Take a deep breath | I will take a deep breath to help myself feel more comfortable. |
| Adjust the posture | I will change my posture to help myself feel more comfortable. |
| Mental disengagement | Not thinking about the discomfort will make it tolerable. |
| Habituation | Getting used to it will relief the discomfort. |
| Perceived control | I will tell myself that the weather does not feel uncomfortable. |
| Endurance and confrontive | I will face it and get over it. |
| Rationalization | Such weather is normal here, and it’s not particularly bad. |
| Past Experience | Compared to the past, today’s weather is actually quite good and acceptable. |
| Distraction | Focusing on the ongoing activity helps make it tolerable. |
| Relaxing | I will relax and calm down. |
| Product transfer | The uncomfortable weather is another kind of experience. |
| Kind of Naive optimism | Thinking positively and optimistically makes it acceptable. |
| Wishful thinking | I think maybe the weather will become more comfortable in a while. |
| Time of exposure | I am not staying long, so the discomfort is acceptable. |
| Negative thinking | The bad weather and discomfort cannot be helped. |