Literature DB >> 26516668

Unilateral C-1 posterior arch screws and C-2 laminar screws combined with a 1-side C1-2 pedicle screw system as salvage fixation for atlantoaxial instability.

Jin Guo-Xin1, Wang Huan1.   

Abstract

OBJECT Atlantoaxial instability often requires surgery, and the current methods for fixation pose some risk to vascular and neurological tissues. Thus, new effective and safer methods are needed for salvage operations. This study sought to assess unilateral C-1 posterior arch screws (PASs) and C-2 laminar screws (LSs) combined with 1-side C1-2 pedicle screws (PSs) for posterior C1-2 fixation using biomechanical testing with bilateral C1-2 PSs in a cadaveric model. METHODS Six fresh ligamentous human cervical spines were evaluated for their biomechanics. The cadaveric specimens were tested in their intact condition, stabilization after injury, and after injury at 1.5 Nm of pure moment in 6 directions. The 3 groups tested were bilateral C1-2 PSs (Group A); left side C1-2 PSs with an ipsilateral C-1 PAS + C-2 laminar screw (Group B); and left side C1-2 PSs with a contralateral C-1 PAS + C-2 LS (Group C). During the testing, angular motion was measured using a motion capture platform. Data were recorded, and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Biomechanical testing showed that there was no significant difference among the stabilities of these fixation systems in flexion-extension and rotation control. In left lateral bending, the bilateral C1-2 PS group decreased flexibility by 71.9% compared with the intact condition, the unilateral C1-2 PS and ipsilateral PAS+LS group decreased flexibility by 77.6%, and the unilateral C1-2 PS and contralateral PAS+LS group by 70.0%. Each method significantly decreased C1-2 movements in right lateral bending compared with the intact condition, and the bilateral C1-2 PS system was more stable than the C1-2 PS and contralateral PAS+LS system (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS A unilateral C-1 PAS + C-2 LS combined with 1-side C-1 PSs provided the same acute stability as the PS, and no statistically significant difference in acute stability was found between the 2 screw techniques. These methods may constitute an alternative method for posterior atlantoaxial fixation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-1; LMS = lateral mass screw; LS = laminar screw; PAS = posterior arch screw; PS = pedicle screw; ROM = range of motion; VA = vertebral artery; atlantoaxial fixation; cervical; laminar screw; pedicle screw; posterior arch screw; range of motion; salvage method

Year:  2015        PMID: 26516668     DOI: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE14517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  2 in total

1.  Atlantoaxial Stabilization Using C1 and C2 Laminar Screw Fixation.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuji; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yosuke Horiuchi; Tadahisa Urabe; Shota Fujita; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Posterior spinal fusion using a unilateral C1 posterior arch screw and a C2 laminar screw for atlantoaxial fracture dislocation.

Authors:  Yuichi Ono; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Michio Hongo; Yuji Kasukawa; Yoshinori Ishikawa; Daisuke Kudo; Ryota Kimura; Jumpei Iida; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-05-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.