Literature DB >> 26516475

Evaluating the impact of pain education: how do we know we have made a difference?

Emma Briggs1.   

Abstract

1. Education is a core activity for most healthcare professionals working in pain management and an effective evaluation strategy should assess its impact. 2. Evaluation may have one or more purposes: accountability, development or knowledge generation. Other key principles include making evaluation integral to the education process, reflecting with learners on progress, self-evaluation by the pain educator and involving all the key stakeholders. 3. A wide variety of methods are available, but the choice will be influenced by the nature and amount of the pain education, number of learners, purpose of the evaluation and time and resources available. 4. Patient education can be evaluated through knowledge and attitude questionnaires, concordance with the treatment plan, satisfaction and pain- and disability-related measures. 5. Further research is needed to explore the specific strategies or combination of techniques that are effective for different groups, and build on the theoretical base underpinning effective pain education and evaluation for patients and professionals. 6. The importance of education for the public has also been recently recognised, but this wider educational initiative should also be fully evaluated to assess whether this initiative is making a difference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation; Pain Education; Patient Education; Public Education; postgraduates; undergraduates

Year:  2012        PMID: 26516475      PMCID: PMC4590105          DOI: 10.1177/2049463712449961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  5 in total

Review 1.  Educational interventions to improve cancer pain control: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Allard; E Maunsell; J Labbé; M Dorval
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 2.  Educational interventions by pharmacists to patients with chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael I Bennett; Anne-Marie Bagnall; Gary Raine; S José Closs; Alison Blenkinsopp; Andrew Dickman; John Ellershaw
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 3.  The evaluation of learner outcomes in interprofessional continuing education: a literature review and an analysis of survey instruments.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillan; Emily Lovrics; Elise Halpern; David Wiljer; Nicole Harnett
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  How effective are patient-based educational interventions in the management of cancer pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael I Bennett; Anne-Marie Bagnall; José S Closs
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities.

Authors:  Donald E Moore; Joseph S Green; Harry A Gallis
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.355

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Pain medicine as a cross-sectional subject in German medical schools. An opportunity for general pain management].

Authors:  A Kopf; M Dusch; B Alt-Epping; F Petzke; R-D Treede
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Continuing education in pain management: using a competency framework to guide professional development.

Authors:  Elizabeth Devonshire; Michael K Nicholas
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2018-09-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.