| Literature DB >> 26515643 |
Julius Balogh1,2, Sherilyn Gordon Burroughs1,2, Maha Boktour1,2, Samir Patel1,2, Ashish Saharia1,2, Robert A Ochoa1,2, Robert McFadden1,3, David W Victor1,3, Victor Ankoma-Sey1,3, Joseph Galati1,3, Howard P Monsour1,3, Victor Fainstein1,4, Xian C Li1,2, Kevin A Grimes1,4, A Osama Gaber1,2, Thomas Aloia5, R Mark Ghobrial1,2.
Abstract
Aspergillus infection remains a significant and deadly complication after liver transplantation (LT). We sought to determine whether the antifungal prophylactic use of voriconazole reduces the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in high-risk LT recipients without prohibitively increasing cost. During the study era (April 2008 to April 2014), 339 deceased donor LTs were performed. Of those patients, 174 high-risk recipients were administered antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole. The median biological Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at the time of LT was 33 (range, 18-49) with 56% requiring continuous renal replacement therapy and 50% requiring ventilatory support immediately before transplantation. Diagnosis of IA was stratified as proven, probable, or possible according to previously published definitions. No IA was documented in patients receiving voriconazole prophylaxis. At 90 days after LT, the institutional cost of prophylaxis was $5324 or 5.6% of the predicted cost associated with post-LT aspergillosis. There was no documentation of resistant strains isolated from any recipient who received voriconazole. In conclusion, these data suggest that voriconazole prophylaxis is safe, clinically effective, and cost-effective in high-risk LT recipients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26515643 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Liver Transpl ISSN: 1527-6465 Impact factor: 5.799