Literature DB >> 26515157

Long-term seizure and psychosocial outcomes of vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy.

Vibhangini S Wasade1, Lonni Schultz2, Karthik Mohanarangan2, Aryamaan Gaddam2, Jason M Schwalb2, Marianna Spanaki-Varelas2.   

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a widely used adjunctive treatment option for intractable epilepsy. Most studies have demonstrated short-term seizure outcomes, usually for up to 5 years, and thus far, none have reported psychosocial outcomes in adults. We aimed to assess long-term seizure and psychosocial outcomes in patients with intractable epilepsy on VNS therapy for more than 15 years. We identified patients who had VNS implantation for treatment of intractable epilepsy from 1997 to 2013 at our Comprehensive Epilepsy Program and gathered demographics including age at epilepsy onset and VNS implantation, epilepsy type, number of antiepilepsy drugs (AEDs) and seizure frequency before VNS implantation and at the last clinic visit, and the most recent stimulation parameters from electronic medical records (EMR). Phone surveys were conducted by research assistants from May to November 2014 to determine patients' current seizure frequency and psychosocial metrics, including driving, employment status, and use of antidepressants. Seizure outcomes were based on modified Engel classification (I: seizure-free/rare simple partial seizures; II: >90% seizure reduction (SR), III: 50-90% SR, IV: <50% SR; classes I to III (>50% SR)=favorable outcome). A total of 207 patients underwent VNS implantation, 15 of whom were deceased at the time of the phone survey, and 40 had incomplete data for medical abstraction. Of the remaining 152, 90 (59%) were contacted and completed the survey. Of these, 51% were male, with the mean age at epilepsy onset of 9.4 years (range: birth to 60 years). There were 35 (39%) patients with extratemporal epilepsy, 19 (21%) with temporal, 18 (20%) with symptomatic generalized, 5 (6%) with idiopathic generalized, and 13 (14%) with multiple types. Final VNS settings showed 16 (18%) patients with an output current >2 mA and 14 (16%) with rapid cycling. Of the 80 patients with seizure frequency information, 16 (20%) had a modified Engel class I outcome, 14 (18%) had class II, 24 (30%) had class III, and 26 (33%) had class IV. Eighty percent said having VNS was worthwhile. Among the 90 patients, 43 patients were ≥ 18 years old without developmental delay in whom psychosocial outcomes were further analyzed. There was a decrease in the number of patients driving (31% vs 14%, p=0.052) and working (44% vs 35%, p=0.285) and an increase in the number of patients using antidepressant medication (14% vs 28%, p=0.057) at the time of survey compared to before VNS. In this subset, patients with >50% SR (60%) were taking significantly fewer AEDs at the time of survey compared to patients with unfavorable outcomes (median: 3 vs 4, p=0.045). The associations of >50% SR with the psychosocial outcomes of driving, employment, and antidepressant use were not significant, although 77% of this subset said VNS was worthwhile. This is the first study that assesses both seizure and psychosocial outcomes, and demonstrates favorable seizure outcomes of >50% SR in 68% of patients and seizure freedom in 20% of patients. A large majority of patients (80%) considered VNS therapy worthwhile regardless of epilepsy type and psychosocial outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy; Long-term; Outcome; Psychosocial; Seizure; Vagus nerve stimulation or VNS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26515157     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  5 in total

1.  Long term effect of vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric intractable epilepsy: an extended follow-up.

Authors:  Ayse Serdaroglu; Ebru Arhan; Gökhan Kurt; Atilla Erdem; Tugba Hirfanoglu; Kursad Aydin; Erhan Bilir
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Desensitization of stimulation-induced weight loss: A secondary finding in a patient with vagal nerve stimulator for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Authors:  Fawad A Khan; Mugilan Poongkunran; Bonnie Buratto
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-20

Review 3.  Implant-Mediated Therapy of Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Mortimer Gierthmuehlen; Dennis T T Plachta; Josef Zentner
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy for the Treatment of Seizures in Refractory Postencephalitic Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yulin Sun; Jian Chen; Tie Fang; Lin Wan; Xiuyu Shi; Jing Wang; Zhichao Li; Jiaxin Wang; Zhiqiang Cui; Xin Xu; Zhipei Ling; Liping Zou; Guang Yang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  How technology is driving the landscape of epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Christian Dorfer; Bertil Rydenhag; Gordon Baltuch; Vivek Buch; Jeffrey Blount; Robert Bollo; Jason Gerrard; Daniel Nilsson; Karl Roessler; James Rutka; Ashwini Sharan; Dennis Spencer; Arthur Cukiert
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 6.740

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.