| Literature DB >> 26515033 |
Yongfu Li1,2, Na Chen2, Mark E Harmon3, Yuan Li2, Xiaoyan Cao2, Mark A Chappell4, Jingdong Mao2.
Abstract
A feedback between decomposition and litter chemical composition occurs with decomposition altering composition that in turn influences the decomposition rate. Elucidating the temporal pattern of chemical composition is vital to understand this feedback, but the effects of plant species and cliclass="Disease">mate on chemical changes remain poorly understood, eclass="Chemical">specially over multiple years. In a 10-year decomposition experiment with litter of four class="Chemical">species (<class="Chemical">span class="Species">Acer saccharum, Drypetes glauca, Pinus resinosa, and Thuja plicata) from four sites that range from the arctic to tropics, we determined the abundance of 11 litter chemical constituents that were grouped into waxes, carbohydrates, lignin/tannins, and proteins/peptides using advanced (13)C solid-state NMR techniques. Decomposition generally led to an enrichment of waxes and a depletion of carbohydrates, whereas the changes of other chemical constituents were inconsistent. Inconsistent convergence in chemical compositions during decomposition was observed among different litter species across a range of site conditions, whereas one litter species converged under different climate conditions. Our data clearly demonstrate that plant species rather than climate greatly alters the temporal pattern of litter chemical composition, suggesting the decomposition-chemistry feedback varies among different plant species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26515033 PMCID: PMC4626799 DOI: 10.1038/srep15783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Spectral editing for undecomposed Acer saccharum (ACSA), Drypetes glauca (DRGL), Pinus resinosa (PIRE) and Thuja plicata (THPL);
(a–d) full CP/TOSS spectra for reference with a contact time of 1 ms; (a1–d1) dipolar dephasing spectra showing nonprotonated C and mobile segments such as CH3 and OCH3 with 40 μs dephasing time; (a2–d2) selection of alkyl C with a 13C CSA filter, which in particular identifies OCO-C typical of sugar rings (CSA filter time = 47 μs); (a3–d3) selection of nonprotonated and mobile alkyl C with a CSA filter and dipolar dephasing, which in particular identifies OC (RR’)O-C (CSA filter time = 47 μs; dipolar dephasing time = 40 μs); (a4–d4) selection of protonated alkyl C with a CSA filter and short CP, in particular OCHO around 100 ppm (CSA filter time = 47 μs; CP time = 50 μs); (a5–d5) selection of protonated-C-only groups.
Figure 2Composition of chemical functional groups (%) in (a) Pinus resinosa (PIRE) at four sites, (b) Drypetes glauca (DRGL) at four sites, and (c) four litters at H. J. Andrews Forest (AND) obtained by 13C CP/TOSS and spectral editing technique. Error bars represent the level of S/N ratio.
Figure 3Relative C abundance of different organic compounds (%) in (a) Pinus resinosa (PIRE) at four sites, (b) Drypetes glauca (DRGL) at four sites, and (c) four litters at H. J. Andrews Forest (AND) obtained by 13C CP/TOSS and spectral editing technique. Error bars represent the level of S/N ratio.
Figure 4Principle component analysis of the composition of chemical functional groups for (a) four species, including Acer saccharum (ACSA), Drypetes glauca (DRGL), Pinus resinosa (PIRE) and Thuja plicata (THPL), at H. J. Andrews Forest (AND) at decomposition year of 0, 5 and 10 and (b) Pinus resinosa (PIRE) and Drypetes glauca (DRGL) at three sites, including Arctic Lakes (ARC), H. J. Andrews Forest (AND) and Harvard Forest (HRF), at decomposition year of 0, 5 and 10.
Figure 5Relationship between the relative alkyl C/O-alkyl C (A/O-A) ratio and mass loss in decomposed litter samples for (a) Pinus resinosa (PIRE) at four sites, (b) Drypetes glauca (DRGL) at four sites, and (c) four litters at H. J. Andrews Forest (AND).
Climatic characteristics and biome types of 4 long-term intersite decomposition experiment team (LIDET) sites.
| Site | Code | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation(m) | MAP(cm) | MAT(°C) | AET(cm) | PET(cm) | Biome Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arctic Lakes, Alaska | ARC | 63°38’N | 149°34’W | 760 | 32.7 | –7 | 28.4 | 42.3 | Arctic Tundra |
| Harvard Forest, Massachusetts | HRF | 42°40’N | 72°15’W | 335 | 115.2 | 7.1 | 85.1 | 104.1 | Temperate Deciduous Forest |
| H. J Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon | AND | 44°14’N | 122°11’W | 500 | 230.9 | 8.6 | 76.4 | 98.2 | Temperate Conifer Forest |
| Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico | LUQ | 18°19’N | 65°49’W | 350 | 336.3 | 23 | 123.4 | 125.9 | Humid Tropical Forest |