| Literature DB >> 26514619 |
Shizue Masuki1, Atsumi Morita2, Yoshi-ichiro Kamijo1, Shigeki Ikegawa2, Yufuko Kataoka2, Yu Ogawa2, Eri Sumiyoshi2, Kiwamu Takahashi3, Tohru Tanaka3, Motowo Nakajima3, Hiroshi Nose4.
Abstract
A reduction in exercise efficiency with aging limits daily living activities. We examined whether 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) with sodium ferrous citrate (SFC) increased exercise efficiency and voluntary achievement of interval walking training (IWT) in older women. Ten women [65 ± 3(SD) yr] who had performed IWT for >12 mo and were currently performing IWT participated in this study. The study was conducted in a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover design. All subjects underwent two trials for 7 days each in which they performed IWT with ALA+SFC (100 and 115 mg/day, respectively) or placebo supplement intake (CNT), intermittently with a 2-wk washout period. Before and after each trial, subjects underwent a graded cycling test at 27.0 °C atmospheric temperature and 50% relative humidity, and oxygen consumption rate, carbon dioxide production rate, and lactate concentration in plasma were measured. Furthermore, for the first 6 days of each trial, exercise intensity for IWT was measured by accelerometry. We found that, in the ALA+SFC trial, oxygen consumption rate and carbon dioxide production rate during graded cycling decreased by 12% (P < 0.001) and 11% (P = 0.001) at every workload, respectively, accompanied by a 16% reduction in lactate concentration in plasma (P < 0.001), although all remained unchanged in the CNT trial (P > 0.2). All of the reductions were significantly greater in the ALA+SFC than the CNT trial (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the training days, impulse, and time at fast walking were 42% (P = 0.028), 102% (P = 0.027), and 69% (P = 0.039) higher during the ALA+SFC than the CNT intake period, respectively. Thus ALA+SFC supplementation augmented exercise efficiency and thereby improved IWT achievement in older women.Entities:
Keywords: 5-aminolevulinic acid; exercise efficiency; home-based walking training achievement; respiratory response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26514619 PMCID: PMC4698441 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00582.2015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) ISSN: 0161-7567
Physical characteristics of subjects
| CNT | ALA+SFC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Age, yr | 65 ± 3 | NA | NA | NA |
| Height, cm | 153 ± 3 | NA | NA | NA |
| Body weight, kg | 52.6 ± 2.2 | 52.6 ± 2.1 | 52.8 ± 2.1 | 52.8 ± 2.1 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.5 ± 1.0 | 22.5 ± 1.0 | 22.6 ± 1.0 | 22.6 ± 1.0 |
| HRrest, beats/min | 64 ± 2 | 64 ± 2 | 62 ± 2 | 62 ± 2 |
| SBPrest, mmHg | 143 ± 5 | 135 ± 7 | 141 ± 6 | 137 ± 5 |
| DBPrest, mmHg | 82 ± 3 | 79 ± 4 | 82 ± 4 | 79 ± 3 |
| V̇ | 25.0 ± 1.2 | 24.7 ± 1.1 | 25.4 ± 1.6 | 24.9 ± 1.5 |
| HRpeak, beats/min | 150 ± 2 | 150 ± 2 | 148 ± 4 | 149 ± 2 |
| WLpeak, W | 96 ± 5 | 96 ± 6 | 93 ± 4 | 98 ± 3 |
| Timeexhaustion, min | 16.7 ± 0.6 | 16.4 ± 0.7 | 16.0 ± 0.7 | 16.8 ± 0.5 |
Values are means ± SD for age and height, and means ± SE for the other variables; n = 10 subjects.
CNT, placebo intake condition; ALA+SFC, 5-aminolevulinic acid + sodium ferrous citrate intake condition; NA, not applicable; BMI, body mass index; HRrest, resting heart rate; SBPrest and DBPrest, resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; V̇o2peak, peak oxygen consumption rate during the graded cycling test; HRpeak, peak heart rate at V̇o2peak; WLpeak, peak workload at V̇o2peak; Timeexhaustion, exercise time to exhaustion.
Compared with before supplement intake, P < 0.05.
Fig. 1.Experimental protocol. Ex, graded cycling exercise test; IWT, interval walking training. The study was conducted using a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover design. In each supplement intake, subjects ingested 250 mg of either 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) + sodium ferrous citrate (SFC) or placebo supplement (250 mg × 2 = 500 mg/day). See Table 2 for details of the supplement compositions.
Composition of supplements
| Placebo Supplement (250.00 mg/dose) | ALA+SFC Supplement (250.00 mg/dose) | |
|---|---|---|
| ALA phosphate, mg | 0.00 | 50.00 |
| SFC, mg | 0.00 | 57.36 |
| Pregelatinized starch, mg | 247.50 | 140.14 |
| Silicon dioxide mixture, mg | 2.50 | 2.50 |
Total energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, ALA, and iron intake per day during the supplement intake period
| CNT | ALA+SFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy, kcal | 1,629 ± 71 | 1,530 ± 75 |
| Protein, g | 59.7 ± 2.9 | 58.0 ± 3.7 |
| Fat, g | 48.7 ± 3.6 | 45.3 ± 2.6 |
| Carbohydrate, g | 232 ± 10 | 218 ± 11 |
| ALA, μg | 52.9 ± 4.3 | 53.3 ± 5.0 |
| Iron, mg | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 6.3 ± 0.5 |
Values are means ± SE; n = 10 subjects.
Fig. 2.Oxygen consumption rate (V̇o2), carbon dioxide production rate (V̇co2), and ventilation volume (V̇e) responses during graded cycling exercise under placebo (CNT; left) and ALA+SFC supplement intake (right) conditions. The average value per minute is presented from rest to the highest workload of 75 W at which all subjects could maintain the rhythm. Open symbols, before supplement intake; solid symbols, after supplement intake. Values are means ± SE of 10 subjects. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 vs. before supplement intake.
Changes in V̇o2, V̇co2, V̇e, and [Lac−]p during the graded cycling test after supplement intake
| CNT | ALA+SFC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change | Change | CNT vs. ALA+SFC | |||
| V̇ | −0.17 ± 0.24 | NS | −1.01 ± 0.17 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
| V̇ | −0.19 ± 0.16 | NS | −0.79 ± 0.17 | 0.001 | 0.036 |
| V̇ | −4.8 ± 6.8 | NS | −26.2 ± 9.5 | 0.022 | NS |
| [Lac−]p, mmol/l | −0.04 ± 0.07 | NS | −0.23 ± 0.04 | <0.001 | 0.028 |
Values are means ± SE; n = 10 subjects. Average values during the graded cycling test are presented.
V̇o2, oxygen consumption rate; V̇co2, carbon dioxide production rate; V̇e, ventilation volume; [Lac−]p, lactate concentration in plasma.
Before vs. after supplement intake.
Fig. 3.Plasma lactate concentration ([Lac−]p) responses during graded cycling exercise under CNT (left) and ALA+SFC (right) conditions. Open symbols, before supplement intake; solid symbols, after supplement intake. Values are means ± SE of 10 subjects. ***P < 0.001 vs. before supplement intake.
Fig. 4.Gross, net, and delta efficiencies during graded cycling exercise under CNT (left) and ALA+SFC (right) conditions. Open symbols, before supplement intake; solid symbols, after supplement intake. Values are means ± SE of 10 subjects. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. before supplement intake.
V̇o2 kinetics parameters at the onset of cycling exercise
| CNT | ALA+SFC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Baseline V̇ | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2 |
| ΔV̇ | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.2 |
| 43 ± 4 | 42 ± 5 | 43 ± 4 | 30 ± 4 | |
| TD, s | 3 ± 2 | 6 ± 3 | 4 ± 2 | 3 ± 2 |
Values are means ± SE; n = 10 subjects.
ΔV̇o2, the steady-state increase in V̇o2 above the baseline; τ, time constant; TD, time delay.
Compared with before supplement intake:
P < 0.05 and
P < 0.01.
Fig. 5.Training days (A), training impulse (B), and training time (C) at total, fast, and slow walking during the supplement intake period. Values are means ± SE of 9 subjects. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 between the CNT and ALA+SFC trials.
Fig. 6.Ratio of subjects performing training to total subjects (A), training impulse (B), and training time (C) at fast walking on each day in the period of supplement intake. Values are means ± SE of 9 subjects. *P <0.05 compared with the CNT trial.