Bruce Simons-Morton1, Kaigang Li2, Johnathon Ehsani1, Federico E Vaca3. 1. a Health Behavior Branch, National Institute of Child Health & Human Development , Bethesda , Maryland. 2. b Colorado State University , Department of Health and Exercise Science , Fort Collins , Colorado. 3. c Department of Emergency Medicine , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This research examined the extent to which teenagers who engaged in one form of risky driving also engaged in other forms and whether risky driving measures were reciprocally associated over time. METHODS: The data were from waves 1, 2, and 3 (W1, W2, and W3) of the NEXT Generation study, with longitudinal assessment of a nationally representative sample starting with 10th graders starting in 2009-2010. Three measures of risky driving were assessed in autoregressive and cross-lagged analyses: driving while alcohol/drug impaired (DWI), Checkpoints Risky Driving Scale (risky and unsafe driving), and secondary task engagement while driving. RESULTS: In adjusted autoregression models, the risk variables demonstrated high levels of stability, with significant associations observed across the 3 waves. However, associations between variables were inconsistent. DWI at W2 was associated with risky and unsafe driving at W3 (β = 0.21, P < .01); risky and unsafe driving at W1 was associated with DWI at W2 (β = 0.20, P < .01); and risky and unsafe driving at W2 is associated with secondary task engagement at W3 (β = 0.19, P < .01). Over time, associations between DWI and secondary task engagement were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide modest evidence for the covariability of risky driving, with prospective associations between the Risky Driving Scale and the other measures and reciprocal associations between all 3 variables at some time points. Secondary task engagement, however, appears largely to be an independent measure of risky driving. The findings suggest the importance of implementing interventions that addresses each of these driving risks.
OBJECTIVE: This research examined the extent to which teenagers who engaged in one form of risky driving also engaged in other forms and whether risky driving measures were reciprocally associated over time. METHODS: The data were from waves 1, 2, and 3 (W1, W2, and W3) of the NEXT Generation study, with longitudinal assessment of a nationally representative sample starting with 10th graders starting in 2009-2010. Three measures of risky driving were assessed in autoregressive and cross-lagged analyses: driving while alcohol/drug impaired (DWI), Checkpoints Risky Driving Scale (risky and unsafe driving), and secondary task engagement while driving. RESULTS: In adjusted autoregression models, the risk variables demonstrated high levels of stability, with significant associations observed across the 3 waves. However, associations between variables were inconsistent. DWI at W2 was associated with risky and unsafe driving at W3 (β = 0.21, P < .01); risky and unsafe driving at W1 was associated with DWI at W2 (β = 0.20, P < .01); and risky and unsafe driving at W2 is associated with secondary task engagement at W3 (β = 0.19, P < .01). Over time, associations between DWI and secondary task engagement were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide modest evidence for the covariability of risky driving, with prospective associations between the Risky Driving Scale and the other measures and reciprocal associations between all 3 variables at some time points. Secondary task engagement, however, appears largely to be an independent measure of risky driving. The findings suggest the importance of implementing interventions that addresses each of these driving risks.
Entities:
Keywords:
alcohol; distraction; driving while alcohol/drug impaired; risk taking; teenagers; young drivers
Authors: Bruce G Simons-Morton; Marie Claude Ouimet; Zhiwei Zhang; Sheila E Klauer; Suzanne E Lee; Jing Wang; Paul S Albert; Thomas A Dingus Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Bruce G Simons-Morton; Feng Guo; Sheila G Klauer; Johnathon P Ehsani; Anuj K Pradhan Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Sheila G Klauer; Feng Guo; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Marie Claude Ouimet; Suzanne E Lee; Thomas A Dingus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Federico E Vaca; Kaigang Li; Denise L Haynie; Bruce Simons-Morton; Eduardo Romano; James C Fell Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-04-03 Impact factor: 3.455