Lino M Sawicki1, Johannes Grueneisen2, Christian Buchbender3, Benedikt M Schaarschmidt3, Benedikt Gomez4, Verena Ruhlmann4, Lale Umutlu2, Gerald Antoch3, Philipp Heusch3. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany linomorris.sawicki@med.uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; and. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The lower detection rate of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI than (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding small lung nodules should be considered in the staging of malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of these small lung nodules missed by (18)F-FDG PET/MRI. METHODS: Fifty-one oncologic patients (mean age ± SD, 56.6 ± 14.0 y; 29 women, 22 men; tumor stages, I [n = 7], II [n = 7], III [n = 9], IV [n = 28]) who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent (18)F-FDG PET/MRI on the same day were retrospectively enrolled. Images were analyzed by 2 interpreters in random order and separate sessions with a minimum of 4 wk apart. A maximum of 10 lung nodules was identified for each patient on baseline imaging. The presence, size, and presence of focal tracer uptake was noted for each lung nodule detected on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MRI using a postcontrast T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient echo volume-interpolated breath-hold examination sequence with fat suppression as morphologic dataset. Follow-up CT or (18)F-FDG PET/CT (mean time to follow-up, 11 mo; range, 3-35 mo) was used as a reference standard to define each missed nodule as benign or malignant based on changes in size and potential new tracer uptake. Nodule-to-nodule comparison between baseline and follow-up was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Out of 134 lung nodules found on (18)F-FDG PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI detected 92 nodules. Accordingly, 42 lung nodules (average size ± SD, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm; range, 2-7 mm) were missed by (18)F-FDG PET/MRI. None of the missed lung nodules presented with focal tracer uptake on baseline imaging or follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Thirty-three out of 42 missed lung nodules (78.6%) in 26 patients were rated benign, whereas 9 nodules (21.4%) in 4 patients were rated malignant. As a result, 1 patient required upstaging from tumor stage I to IV. CONCLUSION: Although most small lung nodules missed on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI were found to be benign, there was a relevant number of undetected metastases. However, in patients with advanced tumor stages the clinical impact remains controversial as upstaging is usually more relevant in lower stages.
UNLABELLED: The lower detection rate of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI than (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding small lung nodules should be considered in the staging of malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of these small lung nodules missed by (18)F-FDG PET/MRI. METHODS: Fifty-one oncologic patients (mean age ± SD, 56.6 ± 14.0 y; 29 women, 22 men; tumor stages, I [n = 7], II [n = 7], III [n = 9], IV [n = 28]) who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent (18)F-FDG PET/MRI on the same day were retrospectively enrolled. Images were analyzed by 2 interpreters in random order and separate sessions with a minimum of 4 wk apart. A maximum of 10 lung nodules was identified for each patient on baseline imaging. The presence, size, and presence of focal tracer uptake was noted for each lung nodule detected on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MRI using a postcontrast T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient echo volume-interpolated breath-hold examination sequence with fat suppression as morphologic dataset. Follow-up CT or (18)F-FDG PET/CT (mean time to follow-up, 11 mo; range, 3-35 mo) was used as a reference standard to define each missed nodule as benign or malignant based on changes in size and potential new tracer uptake. Nodule-to-nodule comparison between baseline and follow-up was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Out of 134 lung nodules found on (18)F-FDG PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI detected 92 nodules. Accordingly, 42 lung nodules (average size ± SD, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm; range, 2-7 mm) were missed by (18)F-FDG PET/MRI. None of the missed lung nodules presented with focal tracer uptake on baseline imaging or follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Thirty-three out of 42 missed lung nodules (78.6%) in 26 patients were rated benign, whereas 9 nodules (21.4%) in 4 patients were rated malignant. As a result, 1 patient required upstaging from tumor stage I to IV. CONCLUSION: Although most small lung nodules missed on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI were found to be benign, there was a relevant number of undetected metastases. However, in patients with advanced tumor stages the clinical impact remains controversial as upstaging is usually more relevant in lower stages.
Authors: Eric C Ehman; Geoffrey B Johnson; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Soonmee Cha; Andrew Palmera Leynes; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Thomas A Hope Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Bruno Madore; Gabriela Belsley; Cheng-Chieh Cheng; Frank Preiswerk; Marie Foley Kijewski; Pei-Hsin Wu; Laurel B Martell; Josien P W Pluim; Marcelo Di Carli; Stephen C Moore Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 4.174
Authors: Julian Kirchner; Lino M Sawicki; Felix Nensa; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Henning Reis; Marc Ingenwerth; Simon Bogner; Clemens Aigner; Christian Buchbender; Lale Umutlu; Gerald Antoch; Ken Herrmann; Philipp Heusch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Johannes Grueneisen; Martin Metzenmacher; Benedikt Gomez; Thomas Gauler; Christian Roesel; Philipp Heusch; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu; Gerald Antoch; Christian Buchbender Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nils Martin Bruckmann; Julian Kirchner; Janna Morawitz; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Oliver Hoffmann; Svjetlana Mohrmann; Marc Ingenwerth; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Yan Li; Andreas Stang; Gerald Antoch; Lino M Sawicki; Christian Buchbender Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nils Martin Bruckmann; Julian Kirchner; Janna Morawitz; Lale Umutlu; Wolfgang P Fendler; Ken Herrmann; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Oliver Hoffmann; Tanja Fehm; Maike E Lindemann; Christian Buchbender; Gerald Antoch; Lino M Sawicki Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2022-02-07
Authors: Nils Martin Bruckmann; Lino M Sawicki; Julian Kirchner; Ole Martin; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Wolfgang Fendler; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Oliver Hoffmann; Svjetlana Mohrmann; Frederic Dietzel; Marc Ingenwerth; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Yan Li; Bernd Kowall; Andreas Stang; Gerald Antoch; Christian Buchbender Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 9.236