Literature DB >> 26514171

Can an ¹⁸F-ALF-NOTA-PRGD2 PET/CT Scan Predict Treatment Sensitivity to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma?

Hui Zhang1, Ning Liu2, Song Gao1, Xudong Hu2, Wei Zhao2, Rongjie Tao3, Zhaoqiu Chen4, Jinsong Zheng4, Xiaorong Sun4, Liang Xu4, Wanhu Li4, Jinming Yu2, Shuanghu Yuan5.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study examined the value of a novel 1-step labeled integrin α(v)β3-targeting (18)F-AlF-NOTA-PRGD2 (denoted as (18)F-RGD) scan in assessing sensitivity to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with newly diagnosed GBM were enrolled in this study 3-5 wk after surgical resection. All participants were investigated with (18)F-RGD PET/CT on baseline (T1) and at the third week (T2) after the start of CCRT. Tumor volume, maximal and mean standardized uptake value of the tumor (SUVmax, SUVmean), and tumor-to-nontumor ratios of the tumor volume were obtained. The MRI treatment response was assessed at the 11th week (T3). The change in the lesion volume from T1 to T3 on MRI was used as an endpoint to evaluate the predictive ability of (18)F-RGD PET/CT.
RESULTS: With (18)F-RGD PET/CT imaging, we successfully visualized the residual lesions of GBM. Twenty-five and 23 (18)F-RGD PET/CT scans at baseline and the third week, respectively, were available for analysis. We found that (18)F-RGD PET/CT parameters, both pretreatment SUVmax on baseline (P< 0.05) and intratreatment SUVmax at the third week (SUV(maxT2)) (P< 0.05) and tumor-to-nontumor ratios at the third week (P< 0.05), were predictive of treatment sensitivity to CCRT. Additionally, the change of volume from T1 to T2 on MRI was also predictive (P< 0.05). According to receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis, the most significant parameter was SUV(maxT2) (area under the curve, 0.846). The threshold of SUV(maxT2) was 1.35, and its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.6%, 90.0% and 87.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-RGD PET/CT allows for the noninvasive visualization of GBM lesions and the prediction of sensitivity to CCRT as early as 3 wk after treatment initiation.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-RGD; chemoradiotherapy; glioblastoma; positron emission tomography (PET); predict

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26514171     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  22 in total

1.  In Vivo Characterization of 4 68Ga-Labeled Multimeric RGD Peptides to Image αvβ3 Integrin Expression in 2 Human Tumor Xenograft Mouse Models.

Authors:  Daphne Lobeek; Gerben M Franssen; Michelle T Ma; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Clemens Decristoforo; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman; Samantha Y A Terry; Mark Rijpkema
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  [68Ga]RGD Versus [18F]FDG PET Imaging in Monitoring Treatment Response of a Mouse Model of Human Glioblastoma Tumor with Bevacizumab and/or Temozolomide.

Authors:  Claire Provost; Laura Rozenblum-Beddok; Valérie Nataf; Fatiha Merabtene; Aurélie Prignon; Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Receptor Occupancy Imaging Studies in Oncology Drug Development.

Authors:  Ingrid J G Burvenich; Sagun Parakh; Adam C Parslow; Sze Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Pet Imaging and its Application in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Anisha A Gupte; Anjun Zhang; Dale J Hamilton
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

5.  RGD PET: From Lesion Detection to Therapy Response Monitoring.

Authors:  Gang Niu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Relationship Between Clinicopathological Characteristics and PET/CT Uptake in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: [18F]Alfatide versus [18F]FDG.

Authors:  Yinjun Dong; Yuchun Wei; Guanxuan Chen; Yong Huang; Pingping Song; Shuguang Liu; Jinsong Zheng; Monica Cheng; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Pretreatment PET/CT imaging of angiogenesis based on 18F-RGD tracer uptake may predict antiangiogenic response.

Authors:  Li Li; Li Ma; Dongping Shang; Zhiguo Liu; Qingxi Yu; Suzhen Wang; Xuepeng Teng; Qiang Zhang; Xudong Hu; Wei Zhao; Wenhong Hou; Jianyue Jin; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Jinming Yu; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Unconventional non-amino acidic PET radiotracers for molecular imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Andrei Iagaru; R Laudicella; N Quartuccio; G Argiroffi; P Alongi; L Baratto; E Califaretti; V Frantellizzi; G De Vincentis; A Del Sole; L Evangelista; S Baldari; S Bisdas
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  18F-alfatide PET/CT may predict short-term outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohui Luan; Yong Huang; Song Gao; Xiaorong Sun; Suzhen Wang; Li Ma; Xuepeng Teng; Hong Lu; Jinming Yu; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  18F-RGD PET/CT and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers Predict Outcomes of Patients With Advanced NSCLC Receiving Combined Antiangiogenic Treatment.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Leilei Wu; Zhiguo Liu; Samuel Seery; Jianing Li; Zhenhua Gao; Jinming Yu; Xue Meng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.