BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly considered important. We developed a web-based application to electronically assess PROs in routine dermatological practice. We assessed (1) the relevance of PRO measurement according to health care providers and patients, (2) the feasibility of our application in routine practice according to health care providers, supporting staff and patients, and (3) barriers/facilitators for implementation according to health care providers and supporting staff. METHODS: Health care providers, supporting staff and patients completed study-specific questionnaires. Also, website statistics were analysed. RESULTS: 3/6 clinics participated, including 9 professionals and 80 patients. Both health care providers and patients rated PRO measurement as relevant. However, implementation was only moderately feasible. Time constraints and logistical problems were mentioned as barriers, and motivated patients and supportive staff as facilitators. CONCLUSION: Electronic PRO assessment in routine practice is not self-evident. Adjustments in logistics are recommended to optimize implementation, using a plan-do-study-act approach.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly considered important. We developed a web-based application to electronically assess PROs in routine dermatological practice. We assessed (1) the relevance of PRO measurement according to health care providers and patients, (2) the feasibility of our application in routine practice according to health care providers, supporting staff and patients, and (3) barriers/facilitators for implementation according to health care providers and supporting staff. METHODS: Health care providers, supporting staff and patients completed study-specific questionnaires. Also, website statistics were analysed. RESULTS: 3/6 clinics participated, including 9 professionals and 80 patients. Both health care providers and patients rated PRO measurement as relevant. However, implementation was only moderately feasible. Time constraints and logistical problems were mentioned as barriers, and motivated patients and supportive staff as facilitators. CONCLUSION: Electronic PRO assessment in routine practice is not self-evident. Adjustments in logistics are recommended to optimize implementation, using a plan-do-study-act approach.
Authors: Meghan Reading Turchioe; Lisa V Grossman; Annie C Myers; Dawon Baik; Parag Goyal; Ruth M Masterson Creber Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Lisa M Wintner; Monika Sztankay; David Riedl; Gerhard Rumpold; Alain Nickels; Thomas Licht; Bernhard Holzner Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Hedy A van Oers; Lorynn Teela; Sasja A Schepers; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Björn Schreiweis; Monika Pobiruchin; Veronika Strotbaum; Julian Suleder; Martin Wiesner; Björn Bergh Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428