Literature DB >> 26513393

Similar Prevalence of Acetabular Labral Tear in Professional Ballet Dancers and Sporting Participants.

Susan Mayes1, April-Rose Ferris, Peter Smith, Andrew Garnham, Jill Cook.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of acetabular labral tear in male and female professional ballet dancers with age-matched and sex-matched sporting participants and to determine the relationship to clinical findings and cartilage defects.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Clinical and radiology practices. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine (98 hips) male and female professional ballet dancers (current and retired) with median age 30 years (range: 19-64 years) and 49 (98 hips) age-matched and sex-matched sporting participants. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Group (ballet or sports), sex, age, hip cartilage defects, history of hip pain, Hip and Groin Outcome Score, passive hip internal rotation (IR), and external rotation range of movement (ROM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Labral tear identified with 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
RESULTS: Labral tears were identified in 51% of all 196 hips. The prevalence did not differ significantly between the ballet and sporting participants (P = 0.41) or between sexes (P = 0.34). Labral tear was not significantly associated with clinical measures, such as pain and function scores or rotation ROM (P > 0.01 for all). Pain provocation test using IR at 90° of hip flexion had excellent specificity [96%, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.77%-0.998%] but poor sensitivity (50%, 95% CI, 0.26%-0.74%) for identifying labral tear in participants reporting hip pain. Older age and cartilage defect presence were independently associated with an increased risk of labral tear (both P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of labral tear in male and female professional ballet dancers was similar to a sporting population. Labral tears were not associated with clinical findings but were related to cartilage defects, independent of aging. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Caution is required when interpreting MRI findings as labral tear may not be the source of the ballet dancer's symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26513393     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  6 in total

1.  Atraumatic tears of the ligamentum teres are more frequent in professional ballet dancers than a sporting population.

Authors:  Susan Mayes; April-Rose Ferris; Peter Smith; Andrew Garnham; Jill Cook
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  What is the Prevalence of Hip Intra-Articular Pathologies and Osteoarthritis in Active Athletes with Hip and Groin Pain Compared with Those Without? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Joshua J Heerey; Joanne L Kemp; Andrea B Mosler; Denise M Jones; Tania Pizzari; Mark J Scholes; Rintje Agricola; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic hip labral repair: a comparison between athletes and non-athletes.

Authors:  Huan Sheu; Tien-Yu Yang; Hao-Che Tang; Chen-Te Wu; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Yi-Sheng Chan
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-03-20

4.  Professional ballet dancers have a similar prevalence of articular cartilage defects compared to age- and sex-matched non-dancing athletes.

Authors:  Susan Mayes; April-Rose Ferris; Peter Smith; Andrew Garnham; Jill Cook
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Bony morphology of the hip in professional ballet dancers compared to athletes.

Authors:  Susan Mayes; April-Rose Ferris; Peter Smith; Andrew Garnham; Jill Cook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Understanding hip pathology in ballet dancers.

Authors:  Yash Singh; Matthew Pettit; Osama El-Hakeem; Rachel Elwood; Alan Norrish; Emmanuel Audenaert; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.114

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.