Holly Etchegary1, Glenn Enright2, Rick Audas3, Daryl Pullman3, Terry-Lynn Young4, Kathy Hodgkinson1,4. 1. Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada. 2. Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada. 4. Discipline of Genetics, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Significant gaps remain in the literature on the economic burden of genetic illness. We explored perceived economic burden associated with one inherited cardiac condition, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). METHODS: Semistructured interviews were held with individuals from families affected by ARVC. Data on the perceived financial and economic impacts of ARVC were used to identify emerging categories and themes using the method of constant comparison. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed four themes that described participants' perceptions of the economic impact ARVC had on them and their families: (i) economic impact during childhood, (ii) impact on current and future employment, (iii) impact on current and future financial well-being, and (iv) no perceived economic impact. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to explore the economic burden of ARVC from the perspective of affected families. It revealed a number of perceived burdens, from employment and career choices to worry about insurance for self and children, decreased household spending, and the need for childhood employment. Findings highlight potential areas of discussion for genetic counseling sessions, as well as areas for future research.Genet Med 18 6, 584-592.
PURPOSE: Significant gaps remain in the literature on the economic burden of genetic illness. We explored perceived economic burden associated with one inherited cardiac condition, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). METHODS: Semistructured interviews were held with individuals from families affected by ARVC. Data on the perceived financial and economic impacts of ARVC were used to identify emerging categories and themes using the method of constant comparison. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed four themes that described participants' perceptions of the economic impact ARVC had on them and their families: (i) economic impact during childhood, (ii) impact on current and future employment, (iii) impact on current and future financial well-being, and (iv) no perceived economic impact. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to explore the economic burden of ARVC from the perspective of affected families. It revealed a number of perceived burdens, from employment and career choices to worry about insurance for self and children, decreased household spending, and the need for childhood employment. Findings highlight potential areas of discussion for genetic counseling sessions, as well as areas for future research.Genet Med 18 6, 584-592.
Authors: Frank I Marcus; William J McKenna; Duane Sherrill; Cristina Basso; Barbara Bauce; David A Bluemke; Hugh Calkins; Domenico Corrado; Moniek G P J Cox; James P Daubert; Guy Fontaine; Kathleen Gear; Richard Hauer; Andrea Nava; Michael H Picard; Nikos Protonotarios; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Danita M Yoerger Sanborn; Jonathan S Steinberg; Harikrishna Tandri; Gaetano Thiene; Jeffrey A Towbin; Adalena Tsatsopoulou; Thomas Wichter; Wojciech Zareba Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Bronson D Riley; Julie O Culver; Cécile Skrzynia; Leigha A Senter; June A Peters; Josephine W Costalas; Faith Callif-Daley; Sherry C Grumet; Katherine S Hunt; Rebecca S Nagy; Wendy C McKinnon; Nancie M Petrucelli; Robin L Bennett; Angela M Trepanier Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Michael H Gollob; Louis Blier; Ramon Brugada; Jean Champagne; Vijay Chauhan; Sean Connors; Martin Gardner; Martin S Green; Robert Gow; Robert Hamilton; Louise Harris; Jeff S Healey; Kathleen Hodgkinson; Christina Honeywell; Michael Kantoch; Joel Kirsh; Andrew Krahn; Michelle Mullen; Ratika Parkash; Damian Redfearn; Julie Rutberg; Shubhayan Sanatani; Anna Woo Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.223