E Sobanski1, S Leppämäki2, C Bushe3, L Berggren4, M Casillas5, W Deberdt6. 1. Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: Esther.Sobanski@zi-mannheim.de. 2. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, PL40, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Psychiatry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PL590, FIN-00250 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Medical Department, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd, Erl Wood Manor, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6PH, United Kingdom. 4. Global Statistical Sciences, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Werner Reimers Str. 2-4, 61350 Bad Homburg, Germany. 5. Medical Department, Lilly S.A., Avenida de la Industria, 30, 28108 Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain. 6. Medical Department, S.A Eli Lilly Benelux N.V., Markiesstraat 1/4B, B - 1000 Brussel, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atomoxetine is a well-established pharmacotherapy for adult ADHD. Long-term studies show incremental reductions in symptoms over time. However, clinical experience suggests that patients differ in their response patterns. METHODS: From 13 Eli Lilly-sponsored studies, we pooled and analyzed data for adults with ADHD who completed atomoxetine treatment at long-term (24 weeks; n=1443) and/or short-term (12 weeks; n=2830) time-points, and had CAARS-Inv:SV total and CGI-S data up to or after these time-points and at Week 0 (i.e. at baseline, when patients first received atomoxetine). The goal was to identify and describe distinct trajectories of response to atomoxetine using hierarchical clustering methods and linear mixed modelling. RESULTS: Based on the homogeneity of changes in CAARS-Inv:SV total scores, 5 response clusters were identified for patients who completed long-term (24 weeks) treatment with atomoxetine, and 4 clusters were identified for patients who completed short-term (12 weeks) treatment. Four of the 5 long-term clusters (comprising 95% of completer patients) showed positive trajectories: 2 faster responding clusters (L1 and L2), and 2 more gradually responding clusters (L3 and L4). Responses (i.e.≥30% reduction in CAARS-Inv:SV total score, and CGI-S score≤3) were observed at 8 and 24 weeks in 80% and 95% of completers in Cluster L1, versus 5% and 48% in Cluster L4. CONCLUSIONS: While many adults with ADHD responded relatively rapidly to atomoxetine, others responded more gradually without a clear plateau at 24 weeks. Longer-term treatment may be associated with greater numbers of responders.
BACKGROUND:Atomoxetine is a well-established pharmacotherapy for adult ADHD. Long-term studies show incremental reductions in symptoms over time. However, clinical experience suggests that patients differ in their response patterns. METHODS: From 13 Eli Lilly-sponsored studies, we pooled and analyzed data for adults with ADHD who completed atomoxetine treatment at long-term (24 weeks; n=1443) and/or short-term (12 weeks; n=2830) time-points, and had CAARS-Inv:SV total and CGI-S data up to or after these time-points and at Week 0 (i.e. at baseline, when patients first received atomoxetine). The goal was to identify and describe distinct trajectories of response to atomoxetine using hierarchical clustering methods and linear mixed modelling. RESULTS: Based on the homogeneity of changes in CAARS-Inv:SV total scores, 5 response clusters were identified for patients who completed long-term (24 weeks) treatment with atomoxetine, and 4 clusters were identified for patients who completed short-term (12 weeks) treatment. Four of the 5 long-term clusters (comprising 95% of completer patients) showed positive trajectories: 2 faster responding clusters (L1 and L2), and 2 more gradually responding clusters (L3 and L4). Responses (i.e.≥30% reduction in CAARS-Inv:SV total score, and CGI-S score≤3) were observed at 8 and 24 weeks in 80% and 95% of completers in Cluster L1, versus 5% and 48% in Cluster L4. CONCLUSIONS: While many adults with ADHD responded relatively rapidly to atomoxetine, others responded more gradually without a clear plateau at 24 weeks. Longer-term treatment may be associated with greater numbers of responders.
Authors: Richard S Schottenfeld; Marek C Chawarski; Mehmet Sofuoglu; Weng-Tink Chooi; Norzarina M Zaharim; M Azhar M Yasin; Imran Ahmad; Sharifah Zubaidiah Syed Jaapar; B Kasinather Vicknasingam Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-03-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Katrien De Bruyckere; Chris Bushe; Christoph Bartel; Lovisa Berggren; Cornelis C Kan; Ralf W Dittmann Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Linda A Wietecha; David B Clemow; Andrew S Buchanan; Joel L Young; Elias H Sarkis; Robert L Findling Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 5.243
Authors: Hideyuki Imagawa; Saurabh P Nagar; William Montgomery; Tomomi Nakamura; Masayo Sato; Keith L Davis Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 2.570