Literature DB >> 2651226

Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia.

A Csendes1, I Braghetto, A Henríquez, C Cortés.   

Abstract

Late results in 81 patients with achalasia treated in a prospective randomised study comparing forceful pneumatic dilatation with the Mosher bag and surgical anterior oesophagomyotomy by abdominal route, are reported. There were no deaths from either of the treatments. Two patients (5.6%) had a perforation of the abdominal oesophagus after pneumatic dilatation and were excluded from late follow up. In patients having surgery at radiological evaluation there was gullet diameter significantly increased at the oesophagogastric junction and decreased at the middle third of the oesophagus. One patient was lost from follow up and one died of an oesophageal carcinoma, leaving 95% of excellent results at the late follow up (median 62 months). Resting gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure decreased significantly to approximately 10 mmHg; this was maintained five years after surgery. By contrast, in patients having pneumatic dilatation, there were good results in only 65% (follow up median 58 months), with 30% failures. One patient was lost from follow up and one developed oesophageal carcinoma. Measurement of resting gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure after dilatation was highly predictive of the outcome. The study shows that surgical treatment offers a better final clinical result than pneumatic dilatation with the Mosher bag.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2651226      PMCID: PMC1378449          DOI: 10.1136/gut.30.3.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  15 in total

1.  An uncontrolled comparison of treatments for achalasia.

Authors:  J Yon; J Christensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Motility studies in fifty patients with achalasia of the esophagus.

Authors:  P Uribe; A Csendes; A Larrain; M Ayala
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Long-term clinical, radiological and manometric follow-up of patients with achalasia treated with pneumatic dilatation.

Authors:  A Csendes; T Strauszer
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Physiology of the distal esophagus in achalasia.

Authors:  P Heitmann; J Espinoza; A Csendes
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Esophagomyotomy for esophageal achalasia: experimental, clinical, and manometric aspects.

Authors:  F H Ellis; J C Kiser; J F Schlegel; R J Earlam; J L McVey; A M Olsen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Effects of total fundoplication on function of the esophagus after myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  A Duranceau; E R LaFontaine; B Vallieres
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Pneumatic dilatation in achalasia.

Authors:  I W Fellows; A L Ogilvie; M Atkinson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Treatment of achalasia with pneumatic dilatations.

Authors:  G Vantrappen; J Hellemans; W Deloof; P Valembois; J Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Operation for esophageal achalasia. Results of esophagomyotomy without an antireflux operation.

Authors:  F H Ellis; R E Crozier; E Watkins
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  A prospective randomized study comparing forceful dilatation and esophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia of the esophagus.

Authors:  A Csendes; N Velasco; I Braghetto; A Henriquez
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  117 in total

1.  Effects of previous treatment on results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  M G Patti; C V Feo; M Arcerito; M De Pinto; A Tamburini; U Diener; W Gantert; L W Way
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Surgery for achalasia: 1998.

Authors:  Y Shiino; C J Filipi; Z T Awad; T Tomonaga; R E Marsh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Oesophageal surgery.

Authors:  E J Simchuk; D Alderson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Redo laparoscopic surgery for achalasia.

Authors:  P J Gorecki; R A Hinder; J S Libbey; T Bammer; N Floch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Pneumatic dilatation and laparoscopic cardiomyotomy in the management of achalasia.

Authors:  M Morino; F Rebecchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Advances in minimally invasive esophageal surgery.

Authors:  T R Eubanks; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-06

7.  Achalasia: outcome of patients treated with intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin.

Authors:  C Cuillière; P Ducrotté; F Zerbib; E H Metman; D de Looze; F Guillemot; H Hudziak; H Lamouliatte; J C Grimaud; A Ropert; M Dapoigny; R Bost; M Lémann; M A Bigard; P Denis; J L Auget; J P Galmiche; S Bruley des Varannes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Does illness severity matter? A comparison of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication and esophageal dilation for achalasia.

Authors:  Jason F Reynoso; Manish M Tiwari; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Long-term results of graded pneumatic dilatation under endoscopic guidance in patients with primary esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Ahmet Dobrucali; Yusuf Erzin; Murat Tuncer; Ahmet Dirican
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Surgical treatment of achalasia: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  A Picciocchi; G Cardillo; D D'Ugo; G Castrucci; L Mascellari; P Granone
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.