BACKGROUND: Severity grading is important for the assessment of psoriasis treatment efficacy. This is most commonly achieved by using the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), a subjective tool with inherent inter-rater and intra-rater variability. PASI-naive dermatologists require training to properly conduct a PASI assessment. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether photographic training improves inter-rater and intra-rater variabilities. We also determined which PASI component has the greatest impact on variability. METHODS: Twenty-one dermatologists received 1 hour of PASI training. They were tested before and after the training to evaluate intra-rater variability. The physicians were further tested after training by using a reference photograph. RESULTS: The mean of each PASI component was underevaluated compared with scoring by a PASI expert. The concordance rate with the expert's grading was highest for thickness followed by erythema, scaling, and area. The scaling score showed the greatest improvement after training. After training, the distribution of deviation from the expert's grading, which signifies inter-rater variability, improved only for the PASI area component. The deviation of scaling grading improved upon retesting by using a reference photograph. CONCLUSION: PASI assessment training improved variabilities to some degree but not for every PASI component. The development of an objective psoriasis severity assessment tool will help overcome the subjective variabilities in PASI assessment, which can never be completely eliminated via training.
BACKGROUND: Severity grading is important for the assessment of psoriasis treatment efficacy. This is most commonly achieved by using the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), a subjective tool with inherent inter-rater and intra-rater variability. PASI-naive dermatologists require training to properly conduct a PASI assessment. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether photographic training improves inter-rater and intra-rater variabilities. We also determined which PASI component has the greatest impact on variability. METHODS: Twenty-one dermatologists received 1 hour of PASI training. They were tested before and after the training to evaluate intra-rater variability. The physicians were further tested after training by using a reference photograph. RESULTS: The mean of each PASI component was underevaluated compared with scoring by a PASI expert. The concordance rate with the expert's grading was highest for thickness followed by erythema, scaling, and area. The scaling score showed the greatest improvement after training. After training, the distribution of deviation from the expert's grading, which signifies inter-rater variability, improved only for the PASI area component. The deviation of scaling grading improved upon retesting by using a reference photograph. CONCLUSION:PASI assessment training improved variabilities to some degree but not for every PASI component. The development of an objective psoriasis severity assessment tool will help overcome the subjective variabilities in PASI assessment, which can never be completely eliminated via training.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body surface area; Education; Psoriasis; Severity of illness index
Authors: Joana Ribeiro Costa de Faria; Aline Rezende Aarão; Luiz Miguel Zabaleta Jimenez; Oscar Hernández Silva; João Carlos Regazzi Avelleira Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Savannah D Neu; Anna Strzepa; Dustin Martin; Mary G Sorci-Thomas; Kirkwood A Pritchard; Bonnie N Dittel Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2021-08-25
Authors: Sang Woong Youn; Tsen-Fang Tsai; Colin Theng; Siew-Eng Choon; Benny E Wiryadi; Antonio Pires; Weihao Tan; Min-Geol Lee Journal: Ann Dermatol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Ludovic Amruthalingam; Oliver Buerzle; Philippe Gottfrois; Alvaro Gonzalez Jimenez; Anastasia Roth; Thomas Koller; Marc Pouly; Alexander A Navarini Journal: Healthc Inform Res Date: 2022-07-31
Authors: Fedor Shmarov; Graham R Smith; Sophie C Weatherhead; Nick J Reynolds; Paolo Zuliani Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 4.779