| Literature DB >> 26512021 |
Cornelia Lundblad1, Kristian A Haanes2, Gustaf Grände1, Lars Edvinsson3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a paroxysmal, disabling primary headache that affects 16 % of the adult population. In spite of decades of intense research, the origin and the pathophysiology mechanisms involved are still not fully known. Although triptans and gepants provide effective relief from acute migraine for many patients, their site of action remains unidentified. It has been suggested that during migraine attacks the leakiness of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is altered, increasing the passage of anti-migraine drugs. This study aimed to investigate the effect of experimental inflammation, following dural application of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) or inflammatory soup (IS) on brain and trigeminal microvascular passage.Entities:
Keywords: Complete Freund’s Adjuvant; Inflammatory soup; Microvascular passage; Transfer constant; Trigeminal ganglion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26512021 PMCID: PMC4627622 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-015-0575-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Headache Pain ISSN: 1129-2369 Impact factor: 7.277
Physiological parameters in animals where Ki for 51Cr-EDTA was determined. Hematocrit in animals treated with CFA was lower than in the vehicle group at 24 h following application to the dura. No other differences regarding measured physiological data were observed between the groups
| Vehicle ( | CFA 2 h ( | CFA 24 h ( | CFA 48 h ( | IS 2 h ( | IS 24 h ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHg) | 98 ± 7 | 88 ± 3 | 87 ± 6 | 105 ± 7 | 85 ± 5 | 104 ± 9 |
| Hct (%) | 50 ± 2 | 46 ± 3 | 38 ± 2* | 42 ± 1 | 46 ± 2 | 42 ± 2 |
| pCO2 (kPa) | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.2 |
| pO2 (kPa) | 11.5 ± 0.1 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 11.0 ± 0.2 | 12.7 ± 0.5 | 11.4 ± 0.3 | 11.4 ± 0.5 |
| Na+ (mmol) | 136.3 ± 0.6 | 138.0 ± 1.6 | 138.6 ± 1.0 | 137.0 ± 0.5 | 137.0 ± 0.5 | 136.5 ± 0.9 |
| K+(mmol) | 4.82 ± 0.39 | 4.65 ± 0.39 | 4.36 ± 0.13 | 4.40 ± 0.13 | 4.57 ± 0.14 | 4.55 ± 0.22 |
| pH | 7.50 ± 0.02 | 7.45 ± 0.02 | 7.46 ± 0.02 | 7.46 ± 0.01 | 7.48 ± 0.01 | 7.48 ± 0.01 |
Differences in plasma volumes in tissue was found following application of both CFA and IS compared to vehicle (*p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Dural effect of IS and CFA. Addition of IS and CFA on the dura mater. The control picture was taken at time 0 for IS (a) and CFA (c). The effect of 15 min. stimulation can been observed after IS (b) and CFA (d). Representative pictures. White arrows meningeal vasculature, black arrows brain vasculature
Plasma volume in tissue in analyzed brain structures. Plasma volume in analyzed structures following application of CFA or IS to the dura was compared to plasma volume in analyzed structure following application of vehicle
| Control | CFA 2 h | CFA 24 h | CFA 48 h | IS 2 h | IS 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex (μL/mg) | 7.3 + 0.6 | 12.2 ± 2.5 | 12.6 ± 0.8* | 14.6 + 3.0* | 11.3 ± 0.7* | 11.0 ± 2.0 |
| PAG (μL/mg) | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 15.3 ± 3.2* | 12.8 ± 1.4* | 8.8 ± 1.5 | 13.8 ± 2.9 | 11.8 ± 2.3 |
| Cerebellum (μL/mg) | 9.5 ± 0.4 | 14.2 ± 0.8* | 12.8 ± 0.5 | 29.4 ± 6.2 * | 13.8 ± 1.7 | 16.3 ± 1.3* |
| L Spinal Trigeminal nucleus (μL/mg) | 10.3 ± 1.7 | 14.3 ± 2.3 | 21.2 ± 2.1* | 44.0 ± 14.4* | 12.5 ± 3.5* | 27.0 ± 8.9 |
| R Spinal Trigeminal nucleus (μL/mg) | 12.8 ± 2.6 | 13.7 ± 1.6 | 19.4 ± 1.8 | 23.6 ± 3.4* | 16.0 ± 1.8 | 28.0 ± 11.0 |
| L Trigeminal Ganglion (μL/mg) | 52.3 ± 4.3 | 53.3 ± 12.5 | 48.0 ± 8.0 | 25.8 ± 3.1 | 40.5 ± 13.4 | 59.3 ± 10.3 |
| R Trigeminal Ganglion (μL/min/g) | 54.5 ± 5.7 | 51.7 ± 10.4 | 68.2 ± 13.9 | 22.0 ± 2.6 | 56.7 ± 15.5 | 83.8 ± 27.4 |
Differences in plasma volumes in tissue was found following application of both CFA and IS compared to vehicle (*p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Comparison of the PS for the different structures analysed. a The PS of the TG is much larger than that of the other structures investigated. b Rat brain and TG after perfusion of Evans blue shows that the TG is permeable whereas the brain is not. c The dura mater is permeable to Evans blue
Fig. 3PS in the cortex cerebellum and PAG after treatment with CFA or IS. The figure shows PS for 51Cr-EDTA in the cortex (a), cerebellum (b) and periaquaductal grey (c). PS for treatment following application of CFA or IS to the dura was compared to PS following application of vehicle to the dura. *p ≤0.05
Fig. 4PS in the TG and spinal trigeminal nucleus after treatment with CFA or IS. The figure shows PS for 51Cr-EDTA in the left TNC (a), right TNC (b), left TG (c), and right TG (d). PS for treatment following application of CFA or IS to the dura was compared to PS following application of vehicle to the dura. *p ≤0.05