Literature DB >> 26511926

A new Xist allele driven by a constitutively active promoter is dominated by Xist locus environment and exhibits the parent-of-origin effects.

Yuko Amakawa1, Yuka Sakata2, Yuko Hoki3, Satoru Arata4, Seiji Shioda4, Tatsuo Fukagawa1, Hiroyuki Sasaki3, Takashi Sado5.   

Abstract

The dosage difference of X-linked genes between the sexes in mammals is compensated for by genetic inactivation of one of the X chromosomes in XX females. A noncoding RNA transcribed from the Xist gene at the onset of X chromosome inactivation coats the X chromosome in cis and induces chromosome-wide heterochromatinization. Here, we report a new Xist allele (Xist(CAG)) driven by a CAG promoter, which is known to be constitutively active in many types of cells. The paternal transmission of Xist(CAG) resulted in the preferential inactivation of the targeted paternal X (Xp) not only in the extra-embryonic but also the embryonic lineage, whereas maternal transmission ended with embryonic lethality at the early postimplantation stage with a phenotype that resembled mutant embryos carrying a maternal deficiency in Tsix, an antisense negative regulator of Xist, in both sexes. Interestingly, we found that the upregulation of Xist(CAG) in preimplantation embryos temporally differed depending on its parental origin: its expression started at the 4- to 8-cell stages when paternally inherited, and Xist(CAG) was upregulated at the blastocyst stage when maternally inherited. This might indicate that the Xist locus on Xp is permissive to transcription, but the Xist locus on the maternal X (Xm) is not. We extrapolated from these findings that the maternal Xist allele might manifest a chromatin structure inaccessible by transcription factors relative to the paternal allele. This might underlie the mechanism for the maternal repression of Xist at the early cleavage stage when Tsix expression has not yet occurred on Xm.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromatin; Epigenetics; Mouse; X chromosome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26511926     DOI: 10.1242/dev.128819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  1 in total

Review 1.  What makes the maternal X chromosome resistant to undergoing imprinted X inactivation?

Authors:  Takashi Sado
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.