Literature DB >> 26511535

No evidence for a J-shaped curve in treated hypertensive patients with increased cardiovascular risk: The VALUE trial.

Sverre E Kjeldsen1,2, Eivind Berge1, Sripal Bangalore3, Franz H Messerli4, Giuseppe Mancia5, Björn Holzhauer6, Tsushung A Hua7, Dion Zappe7, Alberto Zanchetti8, Michael A Weber9, Stevo Julius2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have debated the notion that low blood pressure (BP) during treatment, particularly diastolic (DBP), is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. We evaluated the impact of low BP on cardiovascular outcomes in a high-risk population of 15,244 hypertensive patients, almost half of whom had a history of coronary artery disease (CAD). In the prospective Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial, patients were randomized to valsartan or amlodipine regimens and followed for 4.2 years (mean) with no difference in the primary cardiovascular endpoint. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between average on-treatment BP and clinical outcomes. The relationship between BP and cardiovascular events was adjusted for age, gender and body mass index, and baseline qualifying risk factors and diseases (smoking, high total cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, proteinuria, CAD, previous stroke and left ventricular hypertrophy). DBP ≥ 90 mmHg, compared with < 90 mmHg, was associated with increased incidence of the primary cardiovascular endpoint (all cardiac events); however, DBP < 70 mmHg, compared with ≥ 70 mmHg, was not associated with increased incidence after covariate adjustment (no J-shaped curve). Similar results were observed for death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure and stroke, considered separately. Nadir for MI was at DBP of 76 mmHg and for stroke 60 mmHg. The ratio of MI to stroke increased with lower DBP. In CAD patients the MI to stroke ratio was more pronounced than in patients without CAD but there was no significant J-curve in either group. Systolic BP ≥ 150 but not < 130 mmHg, compared with 130-149 mmHg, similarly was associated with increased risk for primary outcome. In conclusion, patients in BP strata ≥ 150/90 mmHg, but not patients in BP strata < 130/70 mmHg, were at increased risk for adverse outcomes in this hypertensive, high-risk population. Although benefit in preventing MI in relation to preventing stroke levels off for the lowest BPs, these data provide no support for a J-curve in the treatment of high-risk hypertensive patients . The increase in the ratio of MI to stroke with lower DBP indicates target organ heterogeneity in that the optimal on-treatment DBP for cerebroprotection is below that for cardioprotection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure-lowering treatment; cardiovascular morbidity; cardiovascular mortality; clinical trial; hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26511535     DOI: 10.3109/08037051.2015.1106750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press        ISSN: 0803-7051            Impact factor:   2.835


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Elusive Search for Optimal Blood Pressure Targets.

Authors:  Alan H Gradman
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Which Target Blood Pressure in Year 2018? Evidence from Recent Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Sondre Heimark; Julian E Mariampillai; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Sverre E Kjeldsen
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Low Diastolic Blood Pressure and Mortality in Older Women. Results From the Women's Health Initiative Long Life Study.

Authors:  Bernhard Haring; Aileen P McGinn; Victor Kamensky; Matthew Allison; Marcia L Stefanick; Peter F Schnatz; Lewis H Kuller; Jeffrey S Berger; Karen C Johnson; Nazmus Saquib; Lorena Garcia; Phyllis A Richey; JoAnn E Manson; Michael Alderman; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.080

4.  Long-Term Mortality in Hypertensive Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the US Cohort of the International Verapamil (SR)/Trandolapril Study.

Authors:  Islam Y Elgendy; Anthony A Bavry; Yan Gong; Eileen M Handberg; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Proceedings from the 2nd European Clinical Consensus Conference for device-based therapies for hypertension: state of the art and considerations for the future.

Authors:  Felix Mahfoud; Roland E Schmieder; Michel Azizi; Atul Pathak; Horst Sievert; Costas Tsioufis; Thomas Zeller; Stefan Bertog; Peter J Blankestijn; Michael Böhm; Michel Burnier; Gilles Chatellier; Isabelle Durand Zaleski; Sebastian Ewen; Guido Grassi; Michael Joner; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Melvin D Lobo; Chaim Lotan; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Gianfranco Parati; Patrick Rossignol; Luis Ruilope; Faisal Sharif; Evert van Leeuwen; Massimo Volpe; Stephan Windecker; Adam Witkowski; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Low Diastolic Blood Pressure is Not Related to Risk of First Episode of Stroke in a High-Risk Population: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT.

Authors:  Piotr Sobieraj; Jacek Lewandowski; Maciej Siński; Bartosz Symonides; Zbigniew Gaciong
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Not afraid of low diastolic blood pressure anymore?

Authors:  Maciej Siński; Piotr Sobieraj; Jacek Lewandowski
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 8.  Hypertensive Crisis in Acute Cerebrovascular Diseases Presenting at the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mariagiovanna Cantone; Giuseppe Lanza; Valentina Puglisi; Luisa Vinciguerra; Jaime Mandelli; Francesco Fisicaro; Manuela Pennisi; Rita Bella; Rosella Ciurleo; Alessia Bramanti
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 9.  [European guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension 2018-what has changed?]

Authors:  S Jung; R E Schmieder
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  Intensive blood pressure treatment in coronary artery disease: implications from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

Authors:  Jiabin Zang; Jianwen Liang; Xiaodong Zhuang; Shaozhao Zhang; Xinxue Liao; Guifu Wu
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.