Literature DB >> 26511429

False-positive Extra-Mammary Findings in Breast MRI: Another Cause for Concern.

Shilpa A Padia1, Mary Freyvogel1, Jill Dietz1, Stephanie Valente1, Colin O'Rourke2, Stephen R Grobmyer1.   

Abstract

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been repeatedly shown to have a high false-positive rate for additional findings in the breast resulting in additional breast imaging and biopsies. We hypothesize that breast MRI is also associated with a high rate of false-positive findings outside of the breast requiring additional evaluation, interventions, and delays in treatment. We performed a retrospective review of all breast MRIs performed on breast cancer patients in 2010 at a single institution. MRI reports were analyzed for extra-mammary findings. The timing and yield of the additional procedures was also analyzed. Three hundred and twenty-seven breast cancer patients (average age = 53.53 ± 11.08 years) had a breast MRI. Incidental, extra-mammary findings were reported in 35/327 patients (10.7%) with a total of 38 incidental findings. The extra-mammary findings were located in the liver (n = 21, 60.0%), thoracic cavity (n = 12, 34.3%), kidneys (n = 1, 2.9%), musculoskeletal system (n = 3, 8.6%), and neck (n = 1, 2.9%). Eighteen of the 35 patients (51.4%) received additional radiographic imaging, 3 (8.6%) received additional laboratory testing, 2 (5.7%) received additional physician referrals and 2 (5.7%) received a biopsy of the finding. The average time to additional procedures in these patients was 14.5 days. None of the incidental, extra-mammary findings were associated with breast cancer or other malignancy. Breast MRI was associated with a high rate (10.7%) of extra-mammary findings, which led to costly additional imaging studies, referrals, and tests. These findings were not associated with breast cancer or other malignancies. Extra-mammary findings highlight an unrecognized adverse consequence of breast MRI.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; cost; delay; extra-mammary; incidental

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26511429     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

1.  Whole-body MRI in patients with lymphoma: collateral findings.

Authors:  Massimo Galia; Domenico Albano; Donatella Narese; Caterina Patti; Vito Chianca; Francesco Di Pietto; Antonino Mulè; Emanuele Grassedonio; Ludovico La Grutta; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Comparing Breast and Abdominal Subspecialists' Follow-Up Recommendations for Incidental Liver Lesions on Breast MRI.

Authors:  Pamela J DiPiro; David P Alper; Catherine S Giess; Daniel I Glazer; Leslie K Lee; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Ultrasonic Diffused Optical Tomography in Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Feng Xue; Jie Jiang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.822

4.  Downstream Mammary and Extramammary Cascade Services and Spending Following Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Mammography Among Commercially Insured Women.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Nancy L Keating; Nitya Thakore; Joyce Lii; Sughra Raza; Lydia E Pace
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.