Literature DB >> 26510918

Comparing the osteogenic potential of bone marrow and tendon-derived stromal cells to repair a critical-sized defect in the rat femur.

Nadja Kunkel1,2,3, Andrea Wagner1,3, Renate Gehwolf1,3, Patrick Heimel4,3, Herbert Tempfer1,3, Stefanie Korntner1,3, Peter Augat5, Herbert Resch2, Heinz Redl4,3, Oliver Betz6, Hans-Christian Bauer1,3, Andreas Traweger1,3.   

Abstract

Despite significant advancements in bone tissue-engineering applications, the clinical impact of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) for the treatment of large osseous defects remains limited. Therefore, other cell sources are under investigation for their osteogenic potential to repair bone. In this study, tendon-derived stromal cells (TDSCs) were evaluated in comparison to BMSCs to support the functional repair of a 5 mm critical-sized, segmental defect in the rat femur. Analysis of the trilineage differentiation capacity of TDSCs and BMSCs cultured on collagen sponges revealed impaired osteogenic differentiation and mineral deposition of TDSCs in vitro, whereas chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation was evident for both cell types. Radiographic assessment demonstrated that neither cell type significantly improved the healing rate of a challenging 5 mm segmental femoral defect. Transplanted TDSCs and BMSCs both led to the formation of only small amounts of bone in the defect area, and histological evaluation revealed non-mineralized, collagen-rich scar tissue to be present within the defect area. Newly formed lamellar bone was restricted to the defect margins, resulting in closure of the medullary cavity. Interestingly, in comparison to BMSCs, significantly more TDSC-derived cells were present at the osteotomy gap up to 8 weeks after transplantation and were also found to be located within newly formed lamellar bone, suggesting their capacity to directly contribute to de novo bone formation. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the in vivo capacity of TDSCs to regenerate a critical-sized defect in the rat femur.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone marrow stromal cells; bone tissue engineering; collagen scaffold; segmental critical-sized bone defect; tendon-derived stromal cells

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26510918     DOI: 10.1002/term.2097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  7 in total

1.  Tethering peptides onto biomimetic and injectable nanofiber microspheres to direct cellular response.

Authors:  Johnson V John; Meera Choksi; Shixuan Chen; Sunil Kumar Boda; Yajuan Su; Alec McCarthy; Matthew J Teusink; Richard A Reinhardt; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Bone marrow stromal/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles regulate osteoblast activity and differentiation in vitro and promote bone regeneration in vivo.

Authors:  Yunhao Qin; Lian Wang; Zhengliang Gao; Genyin Chen; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Enhanced BMP-2-Mediated Bone Repair Using an Anisotropic Silk Fibroin Scaffold Coated with Bone-like Apatite.

Authors:  Christian Deininger; Andrea Wagner; Patrick Heimel; Elias Salzer; Xavier Monforte Vila; Nadja Weißenbacher; Johannes Grillari; Heinz Redl; Florian Wichlas; Thomas Freude; Herbert Tempfer; Andreas Herbert Teuschl-Woller; Andreas Traweger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method.

Authors:  Kiyofumi Takabatake; Masakazu Matsubara; Eiki Yamachika; Yuki Fujita; Yuki Arimura; Kazuki Nakatsuji; Keisuke Nakano; Histoshi Nagatsuka; Seiji Iida
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Global Responses of Il-1β-Primed 3D Tendon Constructs to Treatment with Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields.

Authors:  Renate Gehwolf; Bettina Schwemberger; Malik Jessen; Stefanie Korntner; Andrea Wagner; Christine Lehner; Nadja Weissenbacher; Herbert Tempfer; Andreas Traweger
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model.

Authors:  Yu-Chieh Lee; Ya-Hui Chan; Sung-Chih Hsieh; Wei-Zhen Lew; Sheng-Wei Feng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Sox11 Modified Tendon-Derived Stem Cells Promote the Repair of Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head.

Authors:  Ming Ni; Weiwei Sun; Yucong Li; Lingli Ding; Weiping Lin; Haiwen Peng; Qingyuan Zheng; Jingyang Sun; Juncheng Li; Hao Liu; Yi Yang; Liangliang Xu; Guoqiang Zhang
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.