Siddik Malkoc1, Ahmet Fidancioglu2. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inönü University, Malatya, Turkey. siddikmalkoc@yahoo.com. 2. Private Practice, Konya, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate whether the parameters of ideal angles, ratios, and divine proportions that have been previously mentioned in the literature influence the aesthetic evaluation of Turkish adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of sixty patients (30 males and 30 females) were enrolled in this study. Ages of the subjects ranged from 9 to 17. Pre-treatment extra-oral photographs were taken to evaluate facial aesthetics. Two distinct panels consisting of 50 orthodontists and 50 laypersons were created for scoring the photographs of the patients. Scoring was performed using the VAS scale. Twenty-seven ratios and 19 divine proportions were measured in frontal photographs, and 26 angles were measured in profile photographs. RESULTS: Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between the photograph analysis measurements and VAS scores, and then regression analyses were performed to disclose to what extent significant values may warrant the term beauty. CONCLUSION: As a result of our investigations, none of the golden proportions was associated with facial aesthetics according to both orthodontists and laypersons. According to other angles and ratios that were measured, it was determined that orthodontists noticed the sagittal position of the lower jaw, the distance between the eyes and length of the face, whereas laypersons noticed only the distance between the eyes and length of the face. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that the authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate whether the parameters of ideal angles, ratios, and divine proportions that have been previously mentioned in the literature influence the aesthetic evaluation of Turkish adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of sixty patients (30 males and 30 females) were enrolled in this study. Ages of the subjects ranged from 9 to 17. Pre-treatment extra-oral photographs were taken to evaluate facial aesthetics. Two distinct panels consisting of 50 orthodontists and 50 laypersons were created for scoring the photographs of the patients. Scoring was performed using the VAS scale. Twenty-seven ratios and 19 divine proportions were measured in frontal photographs, and 26 angles were measured in profile photographs. RESULTS: Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between the photograph analysis measurements and VAS scores, and then regression analyses were performed to disclose to what extent significant values may warrant the term beauty. CONCLUSION: As a result of our investigations, none of the golden proportions was associated with facial aesthetics according to both orthodontists and laypersons. According to other angles and ratios that were measured, it was determined that orthodontists noticed the sagittal position of the lower jaw, the distance between the eyes and length of the face, whereas laypersons noticed only the distance between the eyes and length of the face. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that the authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescents; Aesthetic evaluation; Divine proportions; Facial beauty; Orthognatic surgery
Authors: Benedito V Freitas; Vandilson P Rodrigues; Mariana F Rodrigues; Heloiza V F de Melo; Pedro C F Dos Santos Journal: J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Date: 2018-07-10