E K Plowman1,2, L C Tabor1,2, R Robison1,2, J Gaziano3, C Dion4, S A Watts3, T Vu5, C Gooch5. 1. Neuromotor Speech and Swallowing Restoration Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 2. Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 3. Joy McCann Center for Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 4. Department of Policy and Services Research Data Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is prevalent in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) leading to malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia, and death. These factors necessitate early detection of at-risk patients to prolong maintenance of safe oral intake and pulmonary function. This study aimed to evaluate the discriminant ability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) to identify ALS patients with unsafe airway protection during swallowing. METHODS: Seventy ALS patients completed the EAT-10 survey and underwent a standardized videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing. Two blinded raters determined airway safety using the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS). A between groups anova (safe vs penetrators vs aspirators) was conducted and sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and likelihood ratios calculated. KEY RESULTS: Mean EAT-10 scores for safe swallowers, penetrators, and aspirators (SEM) were: 4.28 (0.79) vs 7.10 (1.79) vs 20.50 (3.19), respectively, with significant differences noted for aspirators vs safe swallowers and aspirators vs penetrators (p < 0.001). The EAT-10 demonstrated good discriminant ability to accurately identify ALS penetrator/aspirators (PAS ≥3) with a cut off score of 3 (AUC: 0.77, sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 57%). The EAT-10 demonstrated excellent accuracy at identifying aspirators (PAS ≥6) utilizing a cut off score of 8 (AUC: 0.88, sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 72%, likelihood ratio: 3.1, negative predictive value: 95.5%). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The EAT-10 differentiated safe vs unsafe swallowing in ALS patients. This patient self-report scale could represent a quick and meaningful aide to dysphagia screening in busy ALS clinics for the identification and referral of dysphagic patients for further instrumental evaluation. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND:Oropharyngeal dysphagia is prevalent in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) leading to malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia, and death. These factors necessitate early detection of at-risk patients to prolong maintenance of safe oral intake and pulmonary function. This study aimed to evaluate the discriminant ability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) to identify ALSpatients with unsafe airway protection during swallowing. METHODS: Seventy ALSpatients completed the EAT-10 survey and underwent a standardized videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing. Two blinded raters determined airway safety using the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS). A between groups anova (safe vs penetrators vs aspirators) was conducted and sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and likelihood ratios calculated. KEY RESULTS: Mean EAT-10 scores for safe swallowers, penetrators, and aspirators (SEM) were: 4.28 (0.79) vs 7.10 (1.79) vs 20.50 (3.19), respectively, with significant differences noted for aspirators vs safe swallowers and aspirators vs penetrators (p < 0.001). The EAT-10 demonstrated good discriminant ability to accurately identify ALS penetrator/aspirators (PAS ≥3) with a cut off score of 3 (AUC: 0.77, sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 57%). The EAT-10 demonstrated excellent accuracy at identifying aspirators (PAS ≥6) utilizing a cut off score of 8 (AUC: 0.88, sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 72%, likelihood ratio: 3.1, negative predictive value: 95.5%). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The EAT-10 differentiated safe vs unsafe swallowing in ALSpatients. This patient self-report scale could represent a quick and meaningful aide to dysphagia screening in busy ALS clinics for the identification and referral of dysphagic patients for further instrumental evaluation. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Antonio Schindler; Francesco Mozzanica; Anna Monzani; Eleonora Ceriani; Murat Atac; Nikolina Jukic-Peladic; Claudia Venturini; Paolo Orlandoni Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 1.547
Authors: Peter M Andersen; Sharon Abrahams; Gian D Borasio; Mamede de Carvalho; Adriano Chio; Philip Van Damme; Orla Hardiman; Katja Kollewe; Karen E Morrison; Susanne Petri; Pierre-Francois Pradat; Vincenzo Silani; Barbara Tomik; Maria Wasner; Markus Weber Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Peter Kühnlein; Hans-Jürgen Gdynia; Anne-Dorte Sperfeld; Beate Lindner-Pfleghar; Albert Christian Ludolph; Mario Prosiegel; Axel Riecker Journal: Nat Clin Pract Neurol Date: 2008-06-17
Authors: R G Miller; C E Jackson; E J Kasarskis; J D England; D Forshew; W Johnston; S Kalra; J S Katz; H Mitsumoto; J Rosenfeld; C Shoesmith; M J Strong; S C Woolley Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: G Ruoppolo; I Schettino; V Frasca; E Giacomelli; L Prosperini; C Cambieri; R Roma; A Greco; P Mancini; M De Vincentiis; V Silani; M Inghilleri Journal: Acta Neurol Scand Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 3.209
Authors: Bridget J Perry; Kaila L Stipancic; Rosemary Martino; Emily K Plowman; Jordan R Green Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 3.438