Literature DB >> 26510752

Radiology Quality Measure Compliance Reporting: an Automated Approach.

Marc Kohli1, Duane Schonlau2.   

Abstract

As part of its ongoing effort to improve healthcare quality, the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has transitioned from monetary rewards to reimbursement penalties for noncompliance or nonparticipation with its quality measurement initiatives. More specifically, eligible providers who bill for CMS patient care, such as radiologists, will face a 2 % negative payment adjustment, if they fail to report adequate participation and compliance with sufficient CMS quality measures in 2015. Although several methods exist to report participation and compliance, each method requires the gathering of relevant studies and assessing the reports for compliance. To aid in this data gathering and to prevent reduced reimbursements, radiology groups should consider implementing automated processes to monitor compliance with these quality measure standards. This article describes one method of creating an automated report scanner, utilizing an open source interface engine called Mirth Connect, that may facilitate the data gathering and monitoring related to reporting compliance with CMS standard #195 Stenosis measurement in Ultrasound Carotid Imaging Reports. The process described in this article is currently utilized by a large multi-institutional radiology group to assess for report compliance and offers the user near real time surveillance of compliance with the quality measure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compliance; HL7; Mirth Connect; PQRS; Pivot table; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26510752      PMCID: PMC4879028          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9835-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  Large-scale automated assessment of radiologist adherence to the Physician Quality Reporting System for stroke.

Authors:  Luciano M Prevedello; Cameron Farkas; Ivan K Ip; Adam B Cohen; Srinivasan Mukundan; Aaron D Sodickson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Developing a radiology data base for quality assurance.

Authors:  P J Haug; M Farrell; J Frear; D Blatter; P R Frederick
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System: early national radiologist experience and near-future performance projections.

Authors:  Richard Duszak; Judy Burleson; David Seidenwurm; Ezequiel Silva
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial : surgical results in 1415 patients.

Authors:  G G Ferguson; M Eliasziw; H W Barr; G P Clagett; R W Barnes; M C Wallace; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; J W Finan; V C Hachinski; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.914

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Quality Management of Pulmonary Nodule Radiology Reports Based on Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Xiaolu Fei; Pengyu Chen; Lan Wei; Yue Huang; Yi Xin; Jia Li
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.