| Literature DB >> 26509880 |
Jintong Tan1, Juan Kan2, Gang Qiu3, Dongying Zhao1, Fang Ren1, Zhongcheng Luo4, Yongjun Zhang5.
Abstract
Neonates are at high risk of meningitis and of resulting neurologic complications. Early recognition of neonates at risk of poor prognosis would be helpful in providing timely management. From January 2008 to June 2014, we enrolled 232 term neonates with bacterial meningitis admitted to 3 neonatology departments in Shanghai, China. The clinical status on the day of discharge from these hospitals or at a postnatal age of 2.5 to 3 months was evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Patients were classified into two outcome groups: good (167 cases, 72.0%, GOS = 5) or poor (65 cases, 28.0%, GOS = 1-4). Neonates with good outcome had less frequent apnea, drowsiness, poor feeding, bulging fontanelle, irritability and more severe jaundice compared to neonates with poor outcome. The good outcome group also had less pneumonia than the poor outcome group. Besides, there were statistically significant differences in hemoglobin, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, C-reaction protein, procalcitonin, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose and CSF protein. Multivariate logistic regression analyses suggested that poor feeding, pneumonia and CSF protein were the predictors of poor outcome. CSF protein content was significantly higher in patients with poor outcome. The best cut-offs for predicting poor outcome were 1,880 mg/L in CSF protein concentration (sensitivity 70.8%, specificity 86.2%). After 2 weeks of treatment, CSF protein remained higher in the poor outcome group. High CSF protein concentration may prognosticate poor outcome in neonates with bacterial meningitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26509880 PMCID: PMC4625018 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics in 232 term neonates with bacterial meningitis by prognosis (poor or good outcome*) and predictor for the poor outcome.
| Good outcome | Poor outcome | P value | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | |||||
| Sex, male(n) | 59(35.3%) | 29(44.6%) | 0.19 | |||
| Birth weight <2500g(n) | 7(4.2%) | 3(4.6%) | 1.00 | |||
| Delivery mode, C-Section(n) | 59(35.3%) | 33(50.8%) | 0.03 | 1.84 (0.67–5.08) | 0.24 | |
| Age at onset(days) | 13.5(7.8) | 11.7(7.3) | 0.10 | |||
| Hospital stay(days) | 28.0(12.4) | 30.3(18.2) | 0.07 | |||
| Clinical symptoms and signs | Fever(n) | 139(83.2%) | 56(86.2%) | 0.59 | ||
| Apnea (n) | 4(2.4%) | 12(18.5%) | <0.001 | 3.12(0.33–29.72) | 0.32 | |
| Drowsiness(n) | 40(24.0%) | 39(60.0%) | <0.001 | 1.35(0.46–4.00) | 0.58 | |
| Poor feeding(n) | 40(24.0%) | 47(72.3%) | <0.001 | 3.83(1.22–12.05) | 0.02 | |
| Vomiting(n) | 7(4.2%) | 7(10.8%) | 0.07 | |||
| Jaundice(n) | 73(43.7%) | 18(27.7%) | 0.03 | 0.40(0.13–1.23) | 0.11 | |
| Seizures (n) | 24(14.4%) | 13(20.0%) | 0.29 | |||
| Bulging fontanelle(n) | 5(3%) | 8(12.3%) | 0.01 | 1.81(0.26–12.65) | 0.55 | |
| Irritability(n) | 10(6%) | 18(27.7%) | <0.001 | 1.22(0.31–4.77) | 0.78 | |
| Hepatosplenomegaly(n) | 8(4.8%) | 4(6.2%) | 0.74 | |||
| Antecedent illness | Sepsis(n) | 74(44.3%) | 21(32.3%) | 0.10 | ||
| Pneumonia(n) | 61(36.5%) | 41(63.1%) | <0.001 | 3.37(1.15–9.84) | 0.03 | |
| Impetigo neonatorum(n) | 2(1.2%) | 3(4.6%) | 0.14 | |||
| Diarrhea(n) | 28(16.8%) | 2(3.1%) | 0.005 | 0.31(0.04–2.45) | 0.27 | |
| Blood parameters | White blood cell(×109/L) | 16.7(6.5) | 15.3(6.5) | 0.15 | ||
| Hemoglobin(g/L) | 142.0(29.5) | 125.3(29.2) | <0.001 | 0.62(0.37–1.04) | 0.07 | |
| Platelet(×109/L) | 298.3(113.2) | 274.9(159.0) | 0.28 | |||
| Thrombocytocrit (%) | 0.47(0.19) | 0.55(0.49) | 0.11 | |||
| Mean platelet volume(fl) | 10.5(1.3) | 11.5(1.5) | <0.001 | 1.62(0.92–2.84) | 0.10 | |
| Platelet distribution width(fl) | 12.5(2.1) | 13.4(2.2) | 0.004 | 1.08(0.63–1.86) | 0.77 | |
| C-reaction protein >8mg/L(n) | 111(66.5) | 56(83.6) | <0.001 | 1.45(0.53–3.95) | 0.47 | |
| Procalcitonin≥0.05ug/L(n) | 117(70.1%) | 62(95.4%) | <0.001 | 2.37(0.64–8.78) | 0.20 | |
| CSF parameters | WBCs (×106/L) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 212.8(351.2) | 886.0(2700.4) | 0.15 | |||
| <100 | 96(57.5%) | 31(47.7%) | 0.39 | |||
| 100∼1000 | 60(35.9%) | 28(43.1%) | ||||
| >1000 | 11(6.6%) | 6(9.2%) | ||||
| CSF polykaryocyte (%) | 55.6(20.5) | 52.2(20.0) | 0.09 | |||
| CSF glucose(mmol/L) | 2.3(1.1) | 1.9(1.5) | <0.001 | 0.90(0.61–1.33) | 0.58 | |
| CSF protein(mg/L) | 1387.0(781.6) | 2549.2(1019.7) | <0.001 | 4.07(2.33–7.11) | <0.001 | |
Data are n (%) or mean (SD)
CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; WBC = white blood cell.
*The prognosis outcome was defined by clinical status on hospital discharge or at a postnatal age about 2.5 to 3 months. Using Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS): 1 death, 2 persistent vegetative state, 3 severe disability, 4 moderate disability, 5 good recovery; GOS = 1–4: poor outcome, GOS = 5: good outcome.
Fig 1Receiver operating characteristic curves for CSF protein in predicting outcomes (poor, good) in neonates with bacterial meningitis.
Sensitivity (true positive rate) is plotted against 1-specificity (false positive rate). The area under the curve was 0.842 for the best cutoff value at 1880 (specificity = 70.8%, sensitivity = 86.2%).
CSF parameters in 225 term neonates with bacterial meningitis after two weeks of antibiotic treatment*.
| Variable | Good outcome (n = 167) | Poor outcome | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBCs (×106/L) | 14.2(19.8) | 20.1(27.0) | 0.90 |
| CSF glucose(mmol/L) | 3.1(0.6) | 2.7(0.6) | <0.001 |
| CSF protein(mg/L) | 922.7(428.3) | 1582.5(686.8) | <0.001 |
CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; WBC = white blood cell.
*The poor outcome had excluded 7 patients with Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) = 1