Literature DB >> 26509380

Aerial and Terrestrial Patterns: A Novel Approach to Analyzing Human Running.

C Gindre1, T Lussiana1, K Hebert-Losier2, L Mourot3.   

Abstract

Biomechanical parameters are often analyzed independently, although running gait is a dynamic system wherein changes in one parameter are likely to affect another. Accordingly, the Volodalen® method provides a model for classifying running patterns into 2 categories, aerial and terrestrial, using a global subjective rating scoring system. We aimed to validate the Volodalen® method by verifying whether the aerial and terrestrial patterns, defined subjectively by a running coach, were associated with distinct objectively-measured biomechanical parameters. The running patterns of 91 individuals were assessed subjectively using the Volodalen® method by an expert running coach during a 10-min running warm-up. Biomechanical parameters were measured objectively using the OptojumpNext® during a 50-m run performed at 3.3, 4.2, and 5 m·s(-1) and were compared between aerial- and terrestrial-classified subjects. Longer contact times and greater leg compression were observed in the terrestrial compared to the aerial runners. The aerial runners exhibited longer flight time, greater center of mass displacement, maximum vertical force and leg stiffness than the terrestrial ones. The subjective categorization of running patterns was associated with distinct objectively-quantified biomechanical parameters. Our results suggest that a subjective holistic assessment of running patterns provides insight into the biomechanics of running gaits of individuals. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26509380     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  8 in total

1.  Predicting Temporal Gait Kinematics: Anthropometric Characteristics and Global Running Pattern Matter.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Thibault Lussiana; Cyrille Gindre; Laurent Mourot
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Relationship between duty factor and external forces in slow recreational runners.

Authors:  Senne Bonnaerens; Pieter Fiers; Samuel Galle; Rud Derie; Peter Aerts; Edward Frederick; Yasunori Kaneko; Wim Derave; Dirk De Clercq; Veerle Segers
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-03-03

3.  Does Characterizing Global Running Pattern Help to Prescribe Individualized Strength Training in Recreational Runners?

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Bastiaan Breine; Adrien Thouvenot; Laurent Mourot; Cyrille Gindre; Thibault Lussiana
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  PIMP Your Stride: Preferred Running Form to Guide Individualized Injury Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Cyrille Gindre; Bastiaan Breine; Aurélien Patoz; Kim Hébert-Losier; Adrien Thouvenot; Laurent Mourot; Thibault Lussiana
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Grizzlies and gazelles: Duty factor is an effective measure for categorizing running style in English Premier League soccer players.

Authors:  Brian Hanley; Catherine B Tucker; Liam Gallagher; Parag Parelkar; Liam Thomas; Rubén Crespo; Rob J Price
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-08-09

6.  Augmented Cooper test: Biomechanical contributions to endurance performance.

Authors:  Salil Apte; Simone Troxler; Cyril Besson; Vincent Gremeaux; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-14

7.  Feel your stride and find your preferred running speed.

Authors:  Thibault Lussiana; Cyrille Gindre
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Duty Factor Is a Viable Measure to Classify Spontaneous Running Forms.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Cyrille Gindre; Adrien Thouvenot; Laurent Mourot; Kim Hébert-Losier; Thibault Lussiana
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.