| Literature DB >> 26509053 |
Johanna Callhoff1, Katinka Albrecht1, Georg Schett2, Angela Zink3, Gisela Westhoff1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the factors that influence patients with early inflammatory arthritis to consider a disability pension.Entities:
Keywords: Early Rheumatoid Arthritis; Epidemiology; Patient perspective
Year: 2015 PMID: 26509053 PMCID: PMC4612683 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RMD Open ISSN: 2056-5933
Baseline characteristics
| Patients employed or on the job market (n=528) | Patients considering or receiving a disability pension (n=69) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 47 (9.5) | 52.3 (6.2) |
| Female (%) | 68 | 59 |
| Symptom duration (weeks), mean (SD) | 12.8 (7.6) | 12.4 (6.6) |
| RF and/or ACPA positive (%) | 57 | 61 |
| ACR/EULAR criteria positive (%) | 58 | 71 |
| DMARDs (%) | 88 | 95 |
| Sick leave during the last 6 months (days), mean (SD) | 14 (25) | 38 (51) |
| BMI, mean (SD) | 26.6 (4.8) | 27.6 (5.1) |
| DAS28 ESR, mean (SD) | 4.4 (1.4) | 5.1 (1.3) |
| ESR (mm/h), mean (SD) | 25 (19.8) | 38.5 (25.3) |
| CRP (mg/L), mean (SD) | 13.6 (27.8) | 27.8 (46.2) |
| Number of comorbidities, mean (SD) | 0.6 (0.9) | 0.9 (1.3) |
| Pain (NRS 0–10), mean (SD) | 5.3 (2.6) | 6.2 (2.5) |
| Fatigue (PROFAD, 0–50), mean (SD) | 14.9 (12.3) | 24 (13) |
| Morning stiffness (NRS 0–10), mean (SD) | 5.1 (3.2) | 6.2 (3) |
| SJC28, mean (SD) | 5.4 (5.1) | 6.6 (6.8) |
| TJC28, mean (SD) | 8.9 (6.1) | 10.3 (6.8) |
| Functional capacity (FFbH, 0–100), mean (SD) | 81.8 (17.4) | 69 (19.1) |
| Unemployed patients (%) | 6 | 18 |
| Patients on sick leave (%) | 17 | 31 |
| Physical job demands (%) | ||
| Low | 30 | 16 |
| Moderate | 31 | 38 |
| Severe | 39 | 46 |
| Education level (%) | ||
| Low | 27 | 40 |
| Moderate | 51 | 37 |
| High | 22 | 23 |
| Depression (PHQ-9) (%) | ||
| No | 60 | 36 |
| Low | 25 | 20 |
| Moderate | 10 | 22 |
| Severe | 5 | 22 |
The 69 patients who have considered a disability pension, applied for one or newly received one are a subgroup of the 528 patients who are employed or on the job market.
ACPA, anticitrullinated protein antibody; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C reactive protein; DAS28, disease activity score; DMARDs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FFbH, Hannover Functional Status Questionnaire; NRS, numerical rating scales; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Score; PROFAD, Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort; RF, rheumatoid factor.
Baseline predictors of early retirement within the first 2 years of rheumatological care: results from univariate logistic regression models
| Reference | OR | 95% CI | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | 0.70 | 0.42 to 1.17 | 0.18 |
| Age | Per year | 1.08 | 1.05 to 1.12 | <0.001 |
| Low educational level | High educational level | 1.5 | 0.75 to 3.02 | 0.24 |
| Heavy physical job demands | Low demands | 2.22 | 0.85 to 5.83 | 0.10 |
| Sick leave 6 months prior to baseline | Per 10 days | 1.19 | 1.11 to 1.27 | <0.001 |
| BMI | Per unit | 1.04 | 0.99 to 1.10 | 0.10 |
| Comorbid conditions | Per condition | 1.33 | 1.05 to 1.69 | 0.02 |
| DAS28 | Per unit | 1.61 | 1.31 to 1.97 | <0.001 |
| Pain (0–10) | Per unit | 1.14 | 1.03 to 1.26 | 0.009 |
| Fatigue (PROFAD, 0–50) | Per 10% increase | 1.31 | 1.19 to 1.45 | <0.001 |
| Morning stiffness (NRS 0–10) | Per unit | 1.13 | 1.04 to 1.23 | 0.004 |
| Functional capacity (FFbH, 0–100) | Per 10% worsening | 1.42 | 1.25 to 1.61 | <0.001 |
| Moderate to severe depression (PHQ-9) | No depression | 4.87 | 2.69 to 8.84 | <0.001 |
| Depression most days (PHQ-9-Item 1) | Not depressive | 8.09 | 3.40 to 19.25 | <0.001 |
| EULAR response at 12 months (no response) | Good response | 1.7 | 0.79 to 3.89 | 0.17 |
BMI, body mass index; DAS28, disease activity score; FFbH, Hannover Functional Status Questionnaire; NRS, numerical rating scales; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Score; PROFAD, Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort.
Figure 1Results from multivariate logistic regression models. The first model includes the full PHQ-9 score as a predictor, the second model includes only question 1 of the PHQ-9 (PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Score; FFbH, Hannover Functional Status Questionnaire).