Literature DB >> 2650896

Epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of two injection techniques.

C T Crochetière1, C A Trépanier, J J Coté.   

Abstract

Two techniques of injection for epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean sections were studied. Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in Group I received 20 ml of lidocaine two per cent with epinephrine via the needle at a rate of 5 ml.30 sec-1 after a 3 ml test dose. Patients in Group II received the same dose of the same solution in increments of 5 ml injected through a catheter after a 3 ml test-dose. Each increment was injected in one minute with a delay of two minutes between injections. Top-up doses were given in both groups to obtain a T4 sensory level. There was no difference between the two groups in the quality of sensory block before delivery. However, the quality was significantly better in Group II after delivery (P = 0.02). The incidence of hypotension was 52.2 per cent in Group I and 13.6 per cent in Group II (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in maternal and umbilical venous lidocaine concentrations. We conclude that injection in fractional doses is a safer and more efficient technique for epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2650896     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  10 in total

1.  THE SYSTEMIC ABSORPTION OF LOCAL ANALGESIC DRUGS.

Authors:  D P BRAID; D B SCOTT
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Incidence of hypotension associated with epidural anesthesia using alkalinized and nonalkalinized lidocaine for cesarean section.

Authors:  S M Parnass; M J Curran; G L Becker
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  The incidence and neonatal effects of maternal hypotension during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  R V Brizgys; P A Dailey; S M Shnider; D M Kotelko; G Levinson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Comparison of pH-adjusted lidocaine solutions for epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  C A DiFazio; H Carron; K R Grosslight; J C Moscicki; W R Bolding; R A Johns
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Local anaesthetic techniques in obstetrics.

Authors:  D D Moir
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Plasma lidocaine concentrations after caudal, lumbar epidural, axillary block, and intravenous regional anesthesia.

Authors:  R I Mazze; R W Dunbar
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1966 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Plasma levels of lidocaine (Xylocaine) in mother and newborn following obstetrical conduction anesthesia: clinical applications.

Authors:  S M Shnider; E L Way
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1968 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Hypotension during epidural analgesia for Caesarean section. Arterial and central venous pressure changes after acute intravenous loading with two litres of Hartmann's solution.

Authors:  M Lewis; P Thomas; R G Wilkes
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  A comparison of T4 and T7 dermatomal levels of analgesia for caesarean section using the lumbar epidural technique.

Authors:  J B Craft; M F Roizen; S D Dao; M Edwards; R Gilman
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1982-05

10.  Choice of local anaesthetic drug for extradural caesarean section. Comparison of 0.5% and 0.75% bupivacaine and 1.5% etidocaine.

Authors:  D A Dutton; D D Moir; H B Howie; J Thorburn; R Watson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.166

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.