Literature DB >> 26508781

Changes in corneal endothelial cell density and the cumulative risk of corneal decompensation after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

Kyoung Nam Kim1, Sung Bok Lee1,2, Yeon Hee Lee1,2, Jong Joo Lee1, Hyung Bin Lim1, Chang-Sik Kim1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate changes in the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and corneal decompensation following Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation.
METHODS: This study was retrospective and observational case series. Patients with refractory glaucoma who underwent AGV implantation and were followed >5 years were consecutively enrolled. We reviewed the medical records, including the results of central corneal specular microscopy. Of the 127 enrolled patients, the annual change in ECD (%) was determined using linear regression for 72 eyes evaluated at least four times using serial specular microscopic examination and compared with 31 control eyes (fellow glaucomatous eyes under medical treatment). The main outcome measures were cumulative risk of corneal decompensation and differences in the ECD loss rates between subjects and controls.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up after AGV implantation was 43.1 months. There were no cases of postoperative tube-corneal touch. The cumulative risk of corneal decompensation was 3.3%, 5 years after AGV implantation. There was a more rapid loss of ECD in the 72 subject eyes compared with the 31 controls (-7.0% and -0.1%/year, respectively; p<0.001). However, the rate of loss decreased over time and statistical significance compared with control eyes disappeared after 2 years postoperatively: -10.7% from baseline to 1 year (p<0.01), -7.0% from 1 year to 2 years (p=0.037), -4.2% from 2 years to 3 years (p=0.230) and -2.7% from 3 years to the final follow-up (p=0.111).
CONCLUSIONS: In case of uncomplicated AGV implantation, the cumulative risk of corneal decompensation was 3.3%, 5 years after the operation. The ECD loss was statistically greater in eyes with AGV than in control eyes without AGV, but the difference was significant only up to 2 years post surgery. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Glaucoma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26508781     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  16 in total

1.  Effectiveness and safety of sulcus fixation of Baerveldt glaucoma implants in glaucomatous eyes in patients who underwent multiple intraocular surgeries.

Authors:  Sotaro Mori; Mari Sakamoto; Takuji Kurimoto; Akiyasu Kanamori; Kaori Ueda; Yukako Inoue; Yuko Yamada; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Glaucoma Drainage Devices and Reasons For Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Catherine G Knier; Feng Wang; Keith Baratz; Cheryl L Khanna
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Surgery and the Utility of Management with Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Neeru A Vallabh; Stephnie Kennedy; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Keri McLean; Hannah Levis; Davide Borroni; Vito Romano; Colin E Willoughby
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.974

4.  Corneal Edema and Keratoplasty: Risk Factors in Eyes With Previous Glaucoma Drainage Devices.

Authors:  Bradley Beatson; Jiangxia Wang; Michael V Boland; Pradeep Ramulu; Oliver Schein; Michael J Fliotsos; Michael E Sulewski; Divya Srikumaran
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.488

5.  The Effect of Tube Location on Corneal Endothelial Cells in Patients with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Yingna Liu; Sukhumal Thanapaisal; Julius Oatts; Yetao Luo; Gui-Shuang Ying; Junming Wang; Stephen D McLeod; Steven J Gedde; Ying Han
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Need for Additional Glaucoma Surgery and Complications Following Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery.

Authors:  Felix F Kung; Catherine G Knier; Armin Garmany; Camilo A Mejia; Jason M Sargent; Sepideh Jamali Dogahe; Nouran Sabbagh; David O Hodge; Cheryl L Khanna
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Rate of Corneal Grafting Post-Glaucoma Drainage Device Use in Pediatric and Adult Patients.

Authors:  Armin Garmany; Catherine Knier; Felix Kung; Camilo Mejia; Jason Sargent; Sepideh Jamali Dogahe; Nouran Sabbagh; David Hodge; Cheryl L Khanna
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Changes in Corneal Endothelial Cell after Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation and Trabeculectomy: 1-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Min Su Kim; Kyoung Nam Kim; Chang-Sik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-06

Review 9.  Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications.

Authors:  Ivano Riva; Gloria Roberti; Francesco Oddone; Anastasios Gp Konstas; Luciano Quaranta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-17

10.  Corneal endothelial cell changes and surgical results after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: ciliary sulcus versus anterior chamber tube placement.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Kim; Jihei Sara Lee; Taekjune Lee; Duri Seo; Wungrak Choi; Hyoung Won Bae; Chan Yun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.