Literature DB >> 26508040

Retrospective analysis evaluating the effect of a keratolytic and physical pretreatment with salicylic acid, urea and curettage on the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses with methylaminolaevulinate.

P Gholam1, C Fink1, I Bosselmann1, A H Enk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective treatment option for actinic keratosis (AK). Hyperkeratosis of the AK impairs penetration of the photosensitizer and light and leads to a reduced efficacy of PDT. Therefore, it is commonly recommended to perform curettage of the AK prior to treatment.
OBJECTIVE: This observational, monocentric, retrospective study sets out to compare the effects of curettage (CUR), chemical keratolytic pretreatment with salicylic acid 10% (SA), and urea cream 40% (UR) on the efficacy and tolerability of PDT.
METHOD: A total of 44 subjects aged 73.2 ± 7.7 years (mean ± SD) with multiple AKs (mean 11.1 per patient) in face and scalp were analysed. In 15 patients, CUR was performed prior to PDT while 15 and 14 patients underwent keratolytic pretreatment with SA and UR, respectively, 1 day prior to PDT. All patients underwent one session of methylaminolaevulinate (MAL) PDT using a 630-nm LED lamp at 37 J/cm(2) , pain was measured using a visual analogue scale. The response rate was calculated using the documented number of AKs prior and 4 weeks after PDT.
RESULTS: Mean lesion response rates were 68.5%, 61.4% and 60.8% for CUR, SA and UR respectively. Differences were not significant. Patients with SA or UR experienced significantly more pain (SA: 6.3 ± 2.7, P = 0.02; UR: 6.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.04) than patients with curettage (4.4 ± 2.1). The cosmetic result and the patients' satisfaction 4 weeks after PDT were good to excellent in all three groups without a significant difference. However, pretreatment with SA or UR led to pronounced local reactions compared to CUR.
CONCLUSION: Keratolytic therapy with SA or UR is an effective pretreatment for PDT. However, it leads to an increase in pain during PDT and pronounced local reactions.
© 2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26508040     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Existing Therapies for Actinic Keratosis: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Laura Del Regno; Silvia Catapano; Alessandro Di Stefani; Simone Cappilli; Ketty Peris
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 6.233

Review 2.  Photodynamic Therapy and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Liezel L Griffin; John T Lear
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Management Pearls on the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses and Field Cancerization.

Authors:  Jaime Piquero-Casals; Daniel Morgado-Carrasco; Yolanda Gilaberte; Rubén Del Rio; Antonio Macaya-Pascual; Corinne Granger; José Luis López-Estebaranz
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2020-07-17

4.  High Patient Satisfaction with Daylight-Activated Methyl Aminolevulinate Cream in the Treatment of Multiple Actinic Keratoses: Results of an Observational Study in Australia.

Authors:  Jo-Ann See; Kurt Gebauer; Jason K Wu; Shobhan Manoharan; Nabil Kerrouche; John Sullivan
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2017-09-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.