| Literature DB >> 26507795 |
Andreas Hoeflich1, Anja Reyer1, Daniela Ohde1, Nancy Schindler1, Julia Brenmoehl1, Marion Spitschak1, Martina Langhammer2, Armin Tuchscherer2, Elisa Wirthgen1,3, Ingrid Renner-Müller4, Rüdiger Wanke5, Friedrich Metzger6, Maximilian Bielohuby7, Eckhard Wolf4,8.
Abstract
Impaired growth is often associated with an extension of lifespan. However, the negative correlation between somatic growth and life expectancy is only true within, but not between, species. This can be observed because smaller species have, as a rule, a shorter lifespan than larger species. In insects and worms, reduced reproductive development and increased fat storage are associated with prolonged lifespan. However, in mammals the relationship between the dynamics of reproductive development, fat metabolism, growth rate, and lifespan are less clear. To address this point, female transgenic mice that were overexpressing similar levels of either intact (D-mice) or mutant insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) lacking the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif (E- mice) were investigated. Both lines of transgenic mice exhibited a similar degree of growth impairment (-9% and -10%) in comparison with wild-type controls (C-mice). While in D-mice, sexual maturation was found to be delayed and life expectancy was significantly increased in comparison with C-mice, these parameters were unaltered in E-mice in spite of their reduced growth rate. These observations indicate that the RGD-domain has a major influence on the pleiotropic effects of IGFBP-2 and suggest that somatic growth and time of sexual maturity or somatic growth and life expectancy are less closely related than thought previously.Entities:
Keywords: AKT; IGFBP-2; aging; cell signaling; growth; reproductive development
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26507795 PMCID: PMC4717279 DOI: 10.1111/acel.12413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Cell ISSN: 1474-9718 Impact factor: 9.304
Figure 1Body weights of female mice expressing wild‐type (D‐mice) or mutated IGFBP‐2 (E‐mice), and of nontransgenic controls (C‐mice) at two different ages (10 and 30 weeks). Both intact and mutated IGFBP‐2 exerted negative effects on somatic growth in 10‐ and 30‐week‐old female mice. Different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Data are presented as LSM ± SE (n > 14).
Figure 2Organ weights of female mice expressing wild‐type (D‐mice) or mutated IGFBP‐2 (E‐mice), and of nontransgenic controls (C‐mice) at two different ages (10 and 30 weeks). Weight changes in transgenic mice are expressed as a percent increase or decrease in comparison with C‐mice, respectively (n > 14). Absolute values are summarized by Tables S1–S4.
Figure 3Life expectancy of female (A) and male (B) transgenic mice overexpressing wild‐type IGFBP‐2 (D‐mice) or IGFBP‐2 lacking the RGD‐sequence (E‐mice) compared to wild‐type controls (C). In three different locations and in the presence of different genetic backgrounds after an age of 490 days, female D‐mice were characterized by increased life expectancy compared with wild‐type littermates (n c: study I: 22, study II: 40, study III: 17; n tg: study I: 20, study II: 35, study III: 9). In study IV, female E‐mice (n = 19) were characterized by a similar long‐term survival in comparison with nontransgenic littermates (n = 16). Males: n c: study II: 17, study III: 20, study IV: 18; n tg: study II: 15, study III: 25, study IV: 16; data are presented as LSM ± SE; *P < 0.05.
Figure 4Progressive survival in female transgenic mice overexpressing wild‐type IGFBP‐2 (D‐mice) and in mice overexpressing IGFBP‐2 lacking the RGD‐sequence (E‐mice). Progressive survival was monitored in male and female D‐ and E‐mice versus controls from all locations included in the present study. Female D‐mice had increased survival (P = 0.002) in comparison with female C‐ mice: n = 71, respectively; male D‐ and C‐ mice: n = 41; female E‐mice and C‐mice: n = 16/19; male E‐ and C‐mice: n = 19/16 (B6: C57BL/6).
Figure 5Reproductive development in female D‐ and E‐mice in comparison with controls. Plugs and vaginal smears were inspected at daily intervals and body weights were recorded. Data are presented as LSM ± SE (C‐mice: n = 45; D‐mice n = 17; E‐mice: n = 17). Different superscripts indicate significant differences with P < 0.05.
Figure 6Specific activation of AKT in brain lysates from female D‐mice in comparison with E‐mice and controls at an age of 10 weeks. Data are presented as % of control ± SE n = 10; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.