Literature DB >> 26507493

A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis.

P Marik1, R Bellomo2.   

Abstract

Aggressive fluid resuscitation to achieve a central venous pressure (CVP) greater than 8 mm Hg has been promoted as the standard of care, in the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. However recent clinical trials have demonstrated that this approach does not improve the outcome of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Pathophysiologically, sepsis is characterized by vasoplegia with loss of arterial tone, venodilation with sequestration of blood in the unstressed blood compartment and changes in ventricular function with reduced compliance and reduced preload responsiveness. These data suggest that sepsis is primarily not a volume-depleted state and recent evidence demonstrates that most septic patients are poorly responsive to fluids. Furthermore, almost all of the administered fluid is sequestered in the tissues, resulting in severe oedema in vital organs and, thereby, increasing the risk of organ dysfunction. These data suggest that a physiologic, haemodynamically guided conservative approach to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis would be prudent and would likely reduce the morbidity and improve the outcome of this disease.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central venous pressure; fluid therapy; pulmonary edema; sepsis; septic shock

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26507493     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  54 in total

1.  The dose makes the poison.

Authors:  Armand R J Girbes; René Robert; Paul E Marik
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Management of the patient presenting for emergency laparotomy.

Authors:  C Ilyas; J Jones; S Fortey
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 3.  New Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock: Implications for Treatment Strategies and Drug Development?

Authors:  Michael Berry; Brijesh V Patel; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Vitamin C in sepsis.

Authors:  Sven-Olaf Kuhn; Konrad Meissner; Lena M Mayes; Karsten Bartels
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.706

5.  Clostridium perfringens sepsis complicated by right ventricular cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Cosmin Balan; Graham Barker; David Garry
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2016-12-19

6.  Lactate guided resuscitation-nothing is more dangerous than conscientious foolishness.

Authors:  Paul E Marik
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Edward A Bittner; Jennifer Sahatjian; Douglas Hansell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Improving the Recognition of, and Response to In-Hospital Sepsis.

Authors:  Peter Chan; Sandra Peake; Rinaldo Bellomo; Daryl Jones
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Metabolic resuscitation in sepsis: a necessary step beyond the hemodynamic?

Authors:  Heitor Pons Leite; Lúcio Flávio Peixoto de Lima
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Severe acute pancreatitis: capillary permeability model linking systemic inflammation to multiorgan failure.

Authors:  Nicole L Komara; Pedram Paragomi; Phil J Greer; Anette S Wilson; Cameron Breze; Georgios I Papachristou; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.