Literature DB >> 26507117

Results of efforts by the Convention on Biological Diversity to describe ecologically or biologically significant marine areas.

Nicholas J Bax1,2, Jesse Cleary3, Ben Donnelly3, Daniel C Dunn3, Piers K Dunstan1, Mike Fuller1, Patrick N Halpin3.   

Abstract

In 2004, Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) addressed a United Nations (UN) call for area-based planning, including for marine-protected areas that resulted in a global effort to describe ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs). We summarized the results, assessed their consistency, and evaluated the process developed by the Secretariat of the CBD to engage countries and experts in 9 regional workshops held from 2011 to 2014. Experts from 92 countries and 79 regional or international bodies participated. They considered 250 million km(2) of the world's ocean area (two-thirds of the total). The 204 areas they examined in detail differed widely in area (from 5.5 km(2) to 11.1 million km(2) ). Despite the initial focus of the CBD process on areas outside national jurisdiction, only 31 of the areas examined were solely outside national jurisdiction. Thirty-five extended into national jurisdictions, 137 were solely within national jurisdictions, and 28 included the jurisdictions of more than 1 country (1 area lacked precise boundaries). Data were sufficient to rank 88-99% of the areas relative to each of the 7 criteria for EBSAs agreed to previously by Parties to the CBD. The naturalness criterion ranked high for a smaller percentage of the EBSAs (31%) than other criteria (51-70%), indicating the difficulty in finding relatively undisturbed areas in the ocean. The highly participatory nature of the workshops, including easy and consistent access to the relevant information facilitated by 2 technical teams, contributed to the workshop participants success in identifying areas that could be ranked relative to most criteria and areas that extend across jurisdictional boundaries. The formal recognition of workshop results by the Conference of Parties to the CBD resulted in these 204 areas being identified as EBSAs by the 196 Parties. They represent the only suite of marine areas recognized by the international community for their greater importance for biodiversity it is their importance for biodiversity itself not conservation as process explicitly excluded management issues than their surroundings. This comes at a critical juncture in negotiations at the UN that will consider developing a new implementation agreement under UN Convention of the Law of the Sea to support the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction. The EBSA description process is a good example of how to bring the international community together to build a shared understanding of which ocean areas are particularly valuable to biodiversity.
© 2015 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convención sobre la Diversidad Biológica; Convention on Biological Diversity; EBSA; area-based management; areas beyond national jurisdiction; biodiversidad; biodiversity; manejo basado en áreas; áreas más allá de la jurisdicción nacional

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26507117     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Ecology and biogeography of megafauna and macrofauna at the first known deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge.

Authors:  J T Copley; L Marsh; A G Glover; V Hühnerbach; V E Nye; W D K Reid; C J Sweeting; B D Wigham; H Wiklund
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The importance of migratory connectivity for global ocean policy.

Authors:  Daniel C Dunn; Autumn-Lynn Harrison; Corrie Curtice; Sarah DeLand; Ben Donnelly; Ei Fujioka; Eleanor Heywood; Connie Y Kot; Sarah Poulin; Meredith Whitten; Susanne Åkesson; Amalia Alberini; Ward Appeltans; José Manuel Arcos; Helen Bailey; Lisa T Ballance; Barbara Block; Hannah Blondin; Andre M Boustany; Jorge Brenner; Paulo Catry; Daniel Cejudo; Jesse Cleary; Peter Corkeron; Daniel P Costa; Michael Coyne; Guillermo Ortuño Crespo; Tammy E Davies; Maria P Dias; Fanny Douvere; Francesco Ferretti; Angela Formia; David Freestone; Ari S Friedlaender; Heidrun Frisch-Nwakanma; Christopher Barrio Froján; Kristina M Gjerde; Lyle Glowka; Brendan J Godley; Jacob Gonzalez-Solis; José Pedro Granadeiro; Vikki Gunn; Yuriko Hashimoto; Lucy M Hawkes; Graeme C Hays; Carolina Hazin; Jorge Jimenez; David E Johnson; Paolo Luschi; Sara M Maxwell; Catherine McClellan; Michelle Modest; Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara; Alejandro Herrero Palacio; Daniel M Palacios; Andrea Pauly; Matt Rayner; Alan F Rees; Erick Ross Salazar; David Secor; Ana M M Sequeira; Mark Spalding; Fernando Spina; Sofie Van Parijs; Bryan Wallace; Nuria Varo-Cruz; Melanie Virtue; Henri Weimerskirch; Laurie Wilson; Bill Woodward; Patrick N Halpin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hydrodynamic controls on connectivity of the high commercial value shrimp Parapenaeus longirostris (Lucas, 1846) in the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Giovanni Quattrocchi; Matteo Sinerchia; Francesco Colloca; Fabio Fiorentino; Germana Garofalo; Andrea Cucco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A fast-moving target: achieving marine conservation goals under shifting climate and policies.

Authors:  Gil Rilov; Simonetta Fraschetti; Elena Gissi; Carlo Pipitone; Fabio Badalamenti; Laura Tamburello; Elisabetta Menini; Paul Goriup; Antonios D Mazaris; Joaquim Garrabou; Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi; Roberto Danovaro; Charles Loiseau; Joachim Claudet; Stelios Katsanevakis
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.657

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.