Literature DB >> 26506982

Light-NBI to identify high-risk phenotypes for gastric adenocarcinoma: do we still need biopsies?

Jorge Lage1, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes1,2, Pedro C Figueiredo3, Diogo Libanio1, Iolanda Ribeiro4, Manuel Jacome5, Luis Afonso5, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis of gastric cancer may be achieved through surveillance of patients with extensive gastric intestinal metaplasia (eGIM). However, diagnosis of eGIM generally implies histology. We aimed at determining the accuracy of high-resolution endoscopy with light-narrow band imaging (NBI) to assess the presence of eGIM on a per-patient basis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort of 60 patients divided into two groups: derivation cohort (n = 25) to evaluate the reliability and validity, and a real-time validation group (n = 35). In the derivation group, six endoscopists with two levels of expertise were asked to estimate the grade of GIM based in endoscopic images (white light endoscopy, light-NBI and amplification/near focus). In the real-time validation set, experienced endoscopists were asked to similarly record their real-time optical diagnosis. Histology was then considered as the gold standard.
RESULTS: In the derivation group diagnosis accuracy was 60% with WLE (non-expert 59% vs. 61% experts), increasing to 73% after NBI magnification (non-expert 63% vs. 83% expert, p < 0.05). Moreover, proportion of agreement with histology was 83%, with a correct diagnosis of eGIM in 87% for experienced observers. In the real-time group experts obtained 89% global diagnostic accuracy correctly identifying 91% of the eGIM. The sensitivity, specificity, LR + and LR- of real-time endoscopic diagnosis of eGIM was 0.92 (CI95%:0.67-0.99), 0.96 (0.79-0.99), 21.1 (3.08-144) and 0.09 (0.013-0.57).
CONCLUSION: For the first time the reliability of high-resolution endoscopy with light-NBI for extension of GIM is described. Our results suggest that more than 90% of individuals at risk could be identified without the need for biopsies, simplifying the current recommendations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic chromoendoscopy; gastric cancer; gastric intestinal metaplasia; narrow-band imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26506982     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1101779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  6 in total

Review 1.  Electronic chromo-endoscopy: technical details and a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Partha Pal; Aniruddha Pratap Singh; Navya D Kanuri; Rupa Banerjee
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

2.  Early diagnosis of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: (not only) an endoscopic challenge!

Authors:  Catarina Brandão; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Evaluation and Management of Gastric Superficial Neoplastic Lesions.

Authors:  Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Diogo Libânio; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 4.  Pernicious Anemia: The Hematological Presentation of a Multifaceted Disorder Caused by Cobalamin Deficiency.

Authors:  Gianluca Esposito; Ludovica Dottori; Giulia Pivetta; Irene Ligato; Emanuele Dilaghi; Edith Lahner
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 5.  Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer in the West.

Authors:  Diogo Libânio; Raquel Ortigão; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-07

6.  Can Chromoendoscopy Improve the Early Diagnosis of Gastric Carcinoma in Dogs?

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius Candido; Pernilla Syrjä; Susanne Kilpinen; Søren Meisner; Mohsen Hanifeh; Thomas Spillmann
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.231

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.