Literature DB >> 26506825

Generalized Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (GMDR) Analysis of Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme-Encoding Gene Polymorphisms may Predict Treatment Outcomes in Indian Breast Cancer Patients.

Gaurav Agarwal1, Sonam Tulsyan2, Punita Lal3, Balraj Mittal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prediction of response and toxicity of chemotherapy can help personalize the treatment and choose effective yet non-toxic treatment regimen for a breast cancer patient. Interplay of variations in various drug-metabolizing enzyme (DME)-encoding genes results in variable response and toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Generalized multi-analytical (GMDR) approach was used to determine the influence of the combination of variants of genes encoding phase 0 (SLC22A16); phase I (CYP450, NQO1); phase II (GSTs, MTHFR, UGT2B15); and phase III (ABCB1) DMEs along with confounding factors on the response and toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs in breast cancer patients.
METHODS: In an Indian breast cancer patient cohort (n = 234), response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 111) and grade 2-4 toxicity to chemotherapy were recorded. Patients were genotyped for 19 polymorphisms selected in four phases of DMEs by PCR or PCR-RFLP or Taqman allelic discrimination assay. Binary logistic regression and GMDR analysis was performed. Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons was applied, and p value was considered to be significant at <0.025.
RESULTS: For ABCB1 1236C>T polymorphism, CT genotype was found to be significantly associated with response to NACT in uni-variate and multi-variate analysis (p = 0.018; p = 0.013). The TT genotype of NQO1 609C>T had a significant association with (absence of) grade 2-4 toxicity in uni-variate analysis (p = 0.021), but a non-significant correlation in multi-variate analysis. In GMDR analysis, interaction of CYP3A5*3, NQO1 609C>T, and ABCB1 1236C>T polymorphisms yielded the highest testing accuracy for response to NACT (CVT = 0.62). However, for grade 2-4 toxicity, CYP2C19*2 and ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphisms yielded the best interaction model (CVT = 0.57).
CONCLUSION: This pharmacogenetic study suggests a role of higher order gene-gene interaction of DME-encoding genes, along with confounding factors, in determination of treatment outcomes and toxicity in breast cancer patients. This can be used as a potential objective tool for individualizing breast cancer chemotherapy with high efficacy and low toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26506825     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3263-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  45 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  In response to "Drug metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms predict clinical outcome in a node-positive breast cancer cohort".

Authors:  Angela DeMichele; Phyllis Gimotty; Jeffrey Botbyl; Richard Aplenc; Theresa Colligon; Andrea S Foulkes; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Further characterization of the expression in liver and catalytic activity of CYP2B6.

Authors:  S Ekins; M Vandenbranden; B J Ring; J S Gillespie; T J Yang; H V Gelboin; S A Wrighton
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Polymorphisms of methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  H Shen; M R Spitz; L E Wang; W K Hong; Q Wei
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Polymorphisms of GSTP1 is associated with differences of chemotherapy response and toxicity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Bai-Lin Zhang; Tong Sun; Bao-Ning Zhang; Shan Zheng; Ning Lü; Bing-He Xu; Xiang Wang; Guo-Ji Chen; Dian-Ke Yu; Dong-Xin Lin
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 6.  Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine.

Authors:  M Whirl-Carrillo; E M McDonagh; J M Hebert; L Gong; K Sangkuhl; C F Thorn; R B Altman; T E Klein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Development of a substrate-activity based approach to identify the major human liver P-450 catalysts of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide activation based on cDNA-expressed activities and liver microsomal P-450 profiles.

Authors:  P Roy; L J Yu; C L Crespi; D J Waxman
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Pharmacogenetics of SLCO1B1 gene and the impact of *1b and *15 haplotypes on irinotecan disposition in Asian cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Xiang; Srinivasa Rao Jada; Hui Hua Li; Lu Fan; Lai San Tham; Chiung Ing Wong; Soo Chin Lee; Robert Lim; Qing Yu Zhou; Boon Cher Goh; Eng Huat Tan; Balram Chowbay
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1 and GSTT1) and survival after treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  C B Ambrosone; C Sweeney; B F Coles; P A Thompson; G Y McClure; S Korourian; M Y Fares; A Stone; F F Kadlubar; L F Hutchins
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Effect of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism on chemosensitivity of colon and breast cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate.

Authors:  Kyoung-Jin Sohn; Ruth Croxford; Zoe Yates; Mark Lucock; Young-In Kim
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Endocannabinoid Gene × Gene Interaction Association to Alcohol Use Disorder in Two Adolescent Cohorts.

Authors:  Laurent Elkrief; Sean Spinney; Daniel E Vosberg; Tobias Banaschewski; Arun L W Bokde; Erin Burke Quinlan; Sylvane Desrivières; Herta Flor; Hugh Garavan; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Rüdiger Brühl; Jean-Luc Martinot; Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Luise Poustka; Sarah Hohmann; Sabina Millenet; Juliane H Fröhner; Michael N Smolka; Henrik Walter; Robert Whelan; Gunter Schumann; Zdenka Pausova; Tomáš Paus; Guillaume Huguet; Patricia Conrod
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Genes Predisposing to Leprosy in Leprosy Household Contacts in Zhejiang Province, China.

Authors:  Yun-Liang Shen; Si-Yu Long; Wen-Ming Kong; Li-Mei Wu; Li-Juan Fei; Qiang Yao; Hong-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2020-12-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.