Literature DB >> 26506176

Effects of Military Load Carriage on Susceptibility to Enemy Fire During Tactical Combat Movements.

Daniel C Billing1, Aaron J Silk, Paul J Tofari, Andrew P Hunt.   

Abstract

Current military operations require soldiers to carry heavy external loads that are widely acknowledged to impair the ability to move tactically on the battlefield. However, to date, the effect of load on susceptibility to enemy fire (the probability of being hit) has not been examined. Nineteen soldiers completed a break contact simulation (five 30-m sprints commencing every 44 seconds) and a fire and movement simulation (sixteen 6-m bounds commencing every 20 seconds) in each of the 5 load conditions (ranging from 9.8 to 30.1 kg). For each simulation, the impact of load on exposure time and peak movement velocity was examined. In addition, the 6 fastest and 6 slowest soldiers (determined by exposure time in the heaviest condition) were parsed into subgroups to examine interindividual differences in response to load. Susceptibility for the 2 subgroups was modeled using exposure time for the 2 simulations and the assumed reaction time, shooting cadence, and shooting accuracy of the enemy. Susceptibility increased as a function of load for both the break contact and fire and movement simulations and became more pronounced when the participant population was parsed into fast and slow groups. When the impact of personal protection systems was isolated and analyzed, it was found that not only were the slower participants more vulnerable (as a result of not wearing the personal protection system) but also more susceptible than the faster participants who carried 11.2 kg more load. Large interindividual differences in response to external load have meaningful consequences for battlefield susceptibility, and it is therefore critical that personnel are afforded tailored training such that they maximize their proficiency in the execution of tactical combat movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26506176     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  The perceived effects and comfort of various body armour systems on police officers while performing occupational tasks.

Authors:  B Schram; B Hinton; R Orr; R Pope; G Norris
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 2.  The Impact of Load Carriage on Measures of Power and Agility in Tactical Occupations: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Aaron Joseph; Amy Wiley; Robin Orr; Benjamin Schram; J Jay Dawes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Soldier Load Carriage, Injuries, Rehabilitation and Physical Conditioning: An International Approach.

Authors:  Robin Orr; Rodney Pope; Thiago Jambo Alves Lopes; Dieter Leyk; Sam Blacker; Beatriz Sanz Bustillo-Aguirre; Joseph J Knapik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparing the Effects of Different Body Armor Systems on the Occupational Performance of Police Officers.

Authors:  Ben Schram; Robin Orr; Rodney Pope; Ben Hinton; Geoff Norris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effects of Combined Strength and Endurance Training on Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Serum Hormones During a 6-Month Crisis Management Operation.

Authors:  Kai Pihlainen; Heikki Kyröläinen; Matti Santtila; Tommi Ojanen; Jani Raitanen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.415

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.