Literature DB >> 26505702

Dermal Fibroblasts from the Red Duroc Pig Have an Inherently Fibrogenic Phenotype: An In Vitro Model of Fibroproliferative Scarring.

Ravi F Sood1, Lara A Muffley, Max E Seaton, Maricar Ga, Pornthep Sirimahachaiyakul, Anne M Hocking, Nicole S Gibran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of hypertrophic scarring is unknown in part because of the lack of a robust animal model. Although the red Duroc pig has emerged as a promising in vivo model, the cellular mechanisms underlying Duroc scarring are unknown, and the size and cost of Duroc pigs are obstacles to their use. Given the central role of the dermal fibroblast in scarring, the authors hypothesized that dermal fibroblasts from the Duroc pig exhibit intrinsic differences in key aspects of the fibroblast response to injury compared with those from the Yorkshire pig, a same-species control that heals normally.
METHODS: Duroc and Yorkshire dermal fibroblasts were isolated from uninjured dorsal skin. Actin stress fibers and focal adhesions were visualized by immunocytochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. Cell migration was measured using a scratch wound-closure assay. Contractile function was assessed by collagen gel contraction. Expression of scarring-related genes was determined by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 protein expression was determined by Western blotting.
RESULTS: Duroc dermal fibroblasts display increased adhesion-complex formation, impaired migration, enhanced collagen contraction, and profibrotic gene and protein expression profiles compared with Yorkshire fibroblasts at baseline. In addition, Duroc fibroblasts overexpressed TGF-β1 and were less responsive to exogenous TGF-β1.
CONCLUSIONS: Duroc dermal fibroblasts have inherent myofibroblastic differentiation that may account for the pathologic scarring in these animals. The authors' data further validate the Duroc model and support Duroc fibroblast cell culture as a simple, inexpensive, reproducible, and biologically tractable in vitro model for the study of fibroproliferative scarring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26505702      PMCID: PMC4624253          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  40 in total

Review 1.  The myofibroblast: an assessment of controversial issues and a definition useful in diagnosis and research.

Authors:  B Eyden
Journal:  Ultrastruct Pathol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.094

Review 2.  Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling.

Authors:  James J Tomasek; Giulio Gabbiani; Boris Hinz; Christine Chaponnier; Robert A Brown
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Deep dermal fibroblasts contribute to hypertrophic scarring.

Authors:  JianFei Wang; Carole Dodd; Heather A Shankowsky; Paul G Scott; Edward E Tredget
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Recombinant human decorin inhibits cell proliferation and downregulates TGF-beta1 production in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts.

Authors:  Zhi Zhang; Xiao-Jian Li; Yan Liu; Xiong Zhang; Ye-Yang Li; Wei-Shi Xu
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Abrogation of transforming growth factor-beta signaling by SMAD7 inhibits collagen gel contraction of human dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  Jürgen Kopp; Ellen Preis; Harun Said; Bernd Hafemann; Lucia Wickert; Axel M Gressner; Norbert Pallua; Steven Dooley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Morphological and immunochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar.

Authors:  H P Ehrlich; A Desmoulière; R F Diegelmann; I K Cohen; C C Compton; W L Garner; Y Kapanci; G Gabbiani
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 7.  Review of the female Duroc/Yorkshire pig model of human fibroproliferative scarring.

Authors:  Kathy Q Zhu; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran; F Frank Isik; Loren H Engrav
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Hic-5 promotes the hypertrophic scar myofibroblast phenotype by regulating the TGF-beta1 autocrine loop.

Authors:  Ganary Dabiri; David A Tumbarello; Christopher E Turner; Livingston Van de Water
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  The molecular mechanism of hypertrophic scar.

Authors:  Zhensen Zhu; Jie Ding; Heather A Shankowsky; Edward E Tredget
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.782

10.  Models of abnormal scarring.

Authors:  Bommie F Seo; Jun Yong Lee; Sung-No Jung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury.

Authors:  Celeste C Finnerty; Marc G Jeschke; Ludwik K Branski; Juan P Barret; Peter Dziewulski; David N Herndon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  In-depth examination of hyperproliferative healing in two breeds of Sus scrofa domesticus commonly used for research.

Authors:  Colton H Funkhouser; Liam D Kirkpatrick; Robert D Smith; Lauren T Moffatt; Jeffrey W Shupp; Bonnie C Carney
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2021-11-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.