Literature DB >> 26505120

Complete removal of the tumor-bearing portal territory decreases local tumor recurrence and improves disease-specific survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Junichi Shindoh1, Masatoshi Makuuchi2, Yutaka Matsuyama3, Yoshihiro Mise4, Junichi Arita4, Yoshihiro Sakamoto4, Kiyoshi Hasegawa4, Norihiro Kokudo5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anatomic resection (AR) of the tumor-bearing portal territory has been reported to be associated with a decreased recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, because of the heterogeneity of the study populations, its oncologic advantage remains controversial. The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical advantage of AR for primary HCC, based on the data from a large prospective cohort treated under a constant surgical policy.
METHODS: In 209 Child-Pugh class A patients with primary, solitary HCC measuring ⩽5.0cm in diameter, which was resectable either by AR or limited resection (non-AR), the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared with patients in whom complete AR was achieved and those who eventually ended up with non-AR after adjustment for the propensity scores to select AR. Advantages of AR in disease-specific survival and local recurrence were also evaluated by competing-risks regression to clarify the true oncologic impact of AR.
RESULTS: The AR group showed better DFS than the non-AR group (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99; p=0.046), while no significant difference was observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.46-1.48; p=0.511). Competing-risks regression revealed that AR significantly decreases local recurrence (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05-0.30; p<0.001) and improves disease-specific survival (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.90; p=0.020), while the other cause of death was highly influenced by patient age (>65years) (HR, 7.51; 95% CI, 2.16-26.04; p=0.002) and not associated with AR.
CONCLUSION: Complete removal of tumor-bearing portal territory decreases the risk of local recurrence and death from HCC.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomic resection; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Propensity score; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26505120     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  47 in total

1.  Successful Anatomic Resection of Tumor-Bearing Portal Territory Delays Long-Term Stage Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Junichi Shindoh; Yuta Kobayashi; Ryosuke Umino; Kazutaka Kojima; Satoshi Okubo; Masaji Hashimoto
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Innovative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Authors:  Junichi Kaneko; Takashi Kokudo; Yoshinori Inagaki; Kiyoshi Hasegawa
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-22

3.  Reply to the Letter "Microvascular Invasion as a Prognostic Predictor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Accurate Is It?"

Authors:  Junichi Shindoh
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 4.  Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update.

Authors:  Masao Omata; Ann-Lii Cheng; Norihiro Kokudo; Masatoshi Kudo; Jeong Min Lee; Jidong Jia; Ryosuke Tateishi; Kwang-Hyub Han; Yoghesh K Chawla; Shuichiro Shiina; Wasim Jafri; Diana Alcantara Payawal; Takamasa Ohki; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Pei-Jer Chen; Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Laurentius A Lesmana; Rino A Gani; Shuntaro Obi; A Kadir Dokmeci; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.047

5.  Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a potential game changer toward global standardization of care.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Association between spleen volume and the post-hepatectomy liver failure and overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Dong Ho Lee; Jeongin Yoo; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh; Haeryoung Kim; Kyung Bun Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Surgery: KRAS mutations and hepatic recurrence after treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Laparoscopic versus open mesohepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Wei Li; Jun Han; Guowei Xie; Yang Xiao; Ke Sun; Kefei Yuan; Hong Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary management of recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an international expert consensus.

Authors:  Tianfu Wen; Chen Jin; Antonio Facciorusso; Matteo Donadon; Ho-Seong Han; Yilei Mao; Chaoliu Dai; Shuqun Cheng; Bixiang Zhang; Baogang Peng; Shunda Du; Changjun Jia; Feng Xu; Jie Shi; Juxian Sun; Peng Zhu; Satoshi Nara; J Michael Millis
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.293

10.  Nomogram to Assist in Surgical Plan for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Prediction Model for Microvascular Invasion.

Authors:  Shengtao Lin; Feng Ye; Weiqi Rong; Ying Song; Fan Wu; Yunhe Liu; Yiling Zheng; Tana Siqin; Kai Zhang; Liming Wang; Jianxiong Wu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.