Literature DB >> 26504743

ATM rs189037 (G > A) polymorphism and risk of lung cancer and head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis.

Aditi Bhowmik1, Sayantan Nath1, Sambuddha Das1, Sankar Kumar Ghosh1, Yashmin Choudhury1.   

Abstract

A number of different epidemiological studies have measured the association between the risk of different cancers and polymorphism at promoter region of 5' untranslated region (5'-UTR) of the Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene. However the results were contentious rather than conclusive. The current study was aimed at evaluating the association between the SNP (rs189037 G>A) and the risk of head and neck cancer and lung cancer by conducting a meta-analysis. A total of 9 case-control studies were considered for this quantitative analysis. Stats Direct Statistical software (version 2.7.2) was used to evaluate the crude odds ratio (OR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI). The dominant model (GG vs. GA + AA) showed no heterogeneity and the fixed effects pooled OR was found to be significant (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.05-1.25) at p = 0.003. The pooled OR for fixed effects of heterozygote and homozygote mutant allele (GA vs. AA) model was significant (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.04-1.30, p = 0.006) and no heterogeneity was observed for this model. The current meta-analysis manifested that ATM rs189037 G>A genetic polymorphism may contribute increased risk of head and neck and lung cancer. Moreover, the AA mutant allele was found to be related significantly with the prognosis of lung cancer and head and neck cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM (rs189037 G>A); Head and neck cancer; Lung cancer; Meta-analysis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504743      PMCID: PMC4564396          DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meta Gene        ISSN: 2214-5400


Introduction

Cancer is an aberrant, uncontrolled growth of cells caused by myriad damage or mutations in the genetic material of the cells due to hereditary or environmental factors, which become immune to many signals controlling cellular growth and death often having the potentiality of invading or spreading to varied body parts (Perez-Herrero & Fernandez-Medarde, 2015). DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most injurious among different types of DNA lesions caused by exogenous toxins such as environmental mutagens and chemical carcinogens in conjunction with endogenous sources resulting from reactive oxygen species (ROS) assembly during cellular respiration etc. (Di Domenico et al., 2014; Khalil et al., 2012). It has been proposed that a single unrepaired DSB might be enough to evoke cell death (Bennett et al., 1993) whereas misrepaired DSBs can result in loss of genetic information, harmful mutation and chromosomal rearrangements which can lead to cancer development (Weber & Ryan, 2015). One of the frequently mutated genes in cancer that functions upstream of TP53 in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway and conceivably linked to the escape from apoptosis/senescence hallmark is the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) located on the long arm of chromosome 11 (11q22–23) and covers around 160 Kb of genomic DNA (Khalil et al., 2012; Macheret & Halazonetis, 2015). The ATM protein is a large 370 kDa serine/threonine kinase that activates over a hundred proteins involved in DDR and other cellular responses like DSB repair, cell cycle regulation, chromatin remodeling, apoptosis etc. and its loss of function contributes to the major features of rare neurodegenerative autosomal recessive disorder ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) including increased cancer risk (Di Domenico et al., 2014; Weber & Ryan, 2015; Chaudhary & Al-Baradie, 2014). The ATM gene has 66 exons and the first four exons lie in the 5′-UTR which undergo extensive alternative splicing thereby giving rise to different mRNA transcripts with varying sequences and lengths having different regulatory roles via the formation of different secondary structures and varying number of start codons (Khalil et al., 2012; Rotman & Shiloh, 1998). Of the majority of the ATM single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the rs189037 (G > A), located at the 5'UTR of the promoter region of ATM gene is one of the vital SNPs associated with the risk of several cancers. Epidemiological studies around the globe confirmed the association between various ATM polymorphisms in different cancer risks (Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2012a; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2012b; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2014; Bea et al., 2013; Landau & Wu, 2013).Various articles related to rs189037 SNP in promoter region of the ATM gene and the risk of different cancers have also been published (Liu et al., 2014; Gu et al., 2014a; Shen et al., 2014; Bau et al., 2010; Damiola et al., 2014; Song et al., 2015; Lo et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2006; Hsia et al., 2013). However, the results were not conclusive. In order to evaluate the association between rs 189037 SNP and cancer risk, we have performed a meta-analysis from relevant scientific literatures.

Materials and methods

Identification and eligibility of relevant literatures

A range of electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, SNPedia, OMIM, Cochrane library) were searched (last search update was 2015 March) using the search terms ‘ATM’, ‘polymorphism’, ‘cancer’, and ‘rs189037 in ATM’. Manual search of references identified in relevant publication was also performed to find other relevant literatures. Studies included in our meta-analysis followed the inclusion criteria mentioned below: (1) All were case–control studies related to rs189037 (G > A) polymorphism, (2) Control group were in accordance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, (3) Details of genotype frequencies of ATM rs189037G > A genetic polymorphisms, and (4) Only studies in English literature were considered for this meta-analysis. The major exclusion criteria: (1) No control group, and (2) No details of genotype frequencies of desired polymorphism.

Data extraction & quality assessment

Data were carefully extracted from all eligible publications independently by two of the authors, according to the inclusion criteria mentioned above. The data were collected from each relevant study according to the following details: the first author's full name, publication year, ethnicity of studied population, design of study, genotyping methods, genotype frequencies etc. The critical appraisal skills program (CASP) for case–control studies (http://www.casp-uk.net/) was performed for quality assurance of the selected eligible studies considered for the quantitative analysis. The scoring pattern for the CASP criteria is as follows: the study addresses a clearly focused issue (CASP1); an appropriate research design answers the research problem (CASP2); the selected cases were inscribed acceptably (CASP3); the controls were selected acceptably (CASP4); the measurement for exposure factors is precise to minimize classification bias (CASP5); the potential confounding factors are considered in the study design/analysis (CASP6); the research results are accomplished (CASP7); the research results are accurate (CASP8); the research results are authentic (CASP9); the research results are applicable to the local population (CASP10); and the research results fit with other available evidence like systematic reviews, case–control studies, cohort studies etc. (CASP11).

Statistical analysis

Meta-analysis was performed using the StatsDirect Statistical software (version 2.7.2). The intensity of the association between SNP and cancers was calculated from odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Z test was performed to estimate the statistical significance of pooled OR. Genotype frequencies of control group were tested for HWE using χ2 test. Cochran's Q statistic and I2 tests were used to test the heterogeneity between studies (Zintzaras & Ioannidis, 2005). If Q test shows a p < 0.05 or I2 demonstrates > 50% which indicates significant heterogeneity, the random effect model was chosen otherwise the fixed effects model was used. Sensitivity analysis was performed to check the potential outliers each time omitting a single study. Funnel plots and Egger's linear regression test were conducted to investigate the significant publication bias (Peters et al., 2006). In funnel plot standard error of log (OR) of each study was plotted against its log (OR) and an asymmetric plot suggested possible publication bias. On other hand the degree of asymmetry was tested using Egger's test where p < 0.05 indicates significant publication bias. The pooled OR was considered to be significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of studies

Initially we identified total 42 studies from different database and manual searches. After reviewing the titles and abstracts, we excluded 4 studies. Out of 38 remaining studies, 29 were excluded further. Finally, 9 case–control studies containing of 4507 cancer patients and 4778 control subjects, met our inclusion criteria for quantitative data analysis (Fig. 1). Overall, the studies were carried out among 8 Asians and 1 Caucasian population according to the inclusion criteria. CASP scores and the characteristics of all the studies are summarized in Fig. 2 and Table 1, respectively (Liu et al., 2014; Gu et al., 2014a; Shen et al., 2014; Bau et al., 2010; Damiola et al., 2014; Song et al., 2015; Lo et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2006; Hsia et al., 2013).
Fig. 1

Flow chart of literature search and relevant study selection. Total 9 case–control studies were included in this meta-analysis.

Fig. 2

CASP scores for 9 eligible studies for the relationship between ATM rs189037 polymorphism and susceptibility to lung, head and neck cancer.

Table 1

Characteristics of relevant studies included in meta-analysis and genotypic frequencies of rs189037 G > A.

StudyEthnicityType of cancerSource of controlGenotyping methodRs189037 G > A (case/control)pa valueCase
Control
GGGAAAGGGAAA
Liu et al. (2014)AsiansLungHBTaqMan real-time PCR852/8520.29217435200264434154
Gu et al. (2013)AsiansPapillary thyroid carcinomaHBMALDI-TOF-MS355/3600.26901966910218969
Shen et al. (2014)AsiansLungHBTaqMan real-time PCR487/5160.121482409915227292
Bau et al. (2010)AsiansOralHBPCR-RFLP620/6200.4718127716223928596
Damiola et al. (2013)CaucasiansPapillary thyroid carcinomaPBIllumina GoldenGate Genotyping Assay68/2010.311332233510660
Song et al. (2014)AsiansPapillary thyroid carcinomaHBTaqMan assay428/1820.3413421183568442
Lo et al. (2010)AsiansLungHBMassARRAY assay728/7170.72238345145239354124
Kim et al. (2006)AsiansLungHBSNP-IT assays611/6140.71190316105195306113
Hsia et al. (2013)AsiansLungHBPCR-RFLP358/7160.6111817664255339122

pa value > 0.05 indicates control group is in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium equation.

Meta-analysis result

The pooled ORs for ATM rs189037G > A and cancer risk is listed in Table 2. The homozygote model (GG vs. AA) showed significant heterogeneity (p = 0.01, I2 = 63.6%) and the random effects pooled OR was 1.23 (95% CI = 1.00–1.51) at p = 0.053. The dominant model (GG vs. GA + AA) showed no heterogeneity and the fixed effects pooled OR was found to be significant (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.05–1.25) at p = 0.003. On other hand recessive model (GG + GA vs. AA) showed significant heterogeneity (p = 0.01, I2 = 60.7%) and the random effects pooled OR did not show any significant result (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.00–1.40) (p = 0.068). The association between A allele and the risk of developing cancer relative to the allele G revealed significant heterogeneity (p = 0.01, I2 = 63.7%) but the random effects pooled OR did not show significant result (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.00–1.23, p = 0.046). Homozygote wild and heterozygote alleles (GG vs. GA) showed no heterogeneity and the pooled OR for fixed effects was not significant (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.20, p = 0.066). However, the pooled OR for fixed effects of heterozygote and homozygote mutant allele (GA vs. AA) model was significant (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.04–1.30, p = 0.006) and no heterogeneity was observed for this model (Fig. 3).
Table 2

Main result of pooled ORs of ATM rs189037 G > A polymorphism.

Genotype rs189037 G > AOR95% CIpb valuep value for Cochran Q testI2Combination method
GG vs. AA1.231.00–1.510.0530.0163.6%Random effect
GG vs. (GA + AA)1.141.05–1.250.0030.1731.6%Fixed effect
(GG + GA) vs. AA1.171.00–1.400.0680.0160.7%Random effect
G vs. A1.111.00–1.230.0460.0163.7%Random effect
GG vs. GA1.091.00–1.200.0660.660%Fixed effect
GA vs. AA1.171.04–1.300.0060.6345.8%Fixed effect

b — p heterogeneity.

Fig. 3

Figure showing forest plots of ATM rs189037 (G > A) polymorphism in association with head and neck and lung cancer: a) GG vs. AA b) GG vs. GA + AA, c) GG + GA vs. AA d) G vs. A e) GG vs. GA f) GA vs. AA.

Sensitivity test was assigned to check the influence of each studies on overall pooled OR. Begg–Mazumdar's funnel plot (Fig. 4) did not show any publication asymmetry which was confirmed by Egger's test. There was no publication bias for ATM rs189037G > A (Homozygote model: tau = − 0.11, p = 0.24; Dominant model: tau = − 0.11, p = 0.33; Recessive model: tau = − 0.39, p = 0.26; Allele model: tau = − 0.06, p = 0.34; Homozygote wild type vs. Heterozygote model: tau = − 0.22, p = 0.39; Heterozygote vs. Homozygote mutant model: tau = − 0.39, p = 0.33).
Fig. 4

Funnel plot results of different models used in meta-analysis: a) GG vs. AA b) GG vs. GA + AA, c) GG + GA vs. AA d) G vs. A e) GG vs. GA f) GA vs. AA.

Discussion

ATM is one of the central kinases in cellular responses to DNA DSBs. ATM is recruited by the MRN complex (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) to the site of DNA DSBs. The C-terminus of NBS1 acts as the binding site for ATM, thereby enhancing its kinase activity. Immediately after recruitment, ATM phosphorylates the histone variant H2AX on serine 139, which further recruits additional proteins in DNA damage response pathway and helps ATM to amplify its signal and form discrete ATM foci at DNA DSBs (Khalil et al., 2012). In response to DNA damage, ATM also interacts with different downstream effectors and induces different signaling functions like cell cycle check point arrest with p53, Mdm2 and Chk2 at G1, damage induced S-phase arrest with NBS1, BRCA1, FancD2 and SMC1, G2/M arrest with BRCA1 and hRad17 and apoptosis with E2F1, Chk2, P53, P73 and Bax (Khalil et al., 2012). The polymorphism rs189037 is located at the 5′UTR of the promoter region of ATM gene (Gu et al., 2014b). It was evident from different studies that polymorphisms in the promoter region of a gene may change the binding sites of transcription factors, which affects gene expression. The heterozygote of rs189037 has been observed to be significantly related to longevity through an effect on ATM transcript like AP-2α, a transcription factor that participates in many important life processes (Rotman & Shiloh, 1998; Chen et al., 2010; Piaceri et al., 2013). There are other possibilities of one or more transcription factors which are regulated by rs189037, and thus different genotypes may up-regulate or down-regulate the expression of ATM gene, which may lead to cancer formation. Different case–control studies have reported the association of rs189037 polymorphism and risk of different cancers (Liu et al., 2014; Gu et al., 2014a; Shen et al., 2014; Bau et al., 2010; Damiola et al., 2014; Song et al., 2015; Lo et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2006). (Liu et al., 2014), (Shen et al., 2014) and (Bau et al., 2010) reported significantly increased risk between the association of lung cancer and oral cancer with the A allele of ATM (Liu et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2014; Bau et al., 2010) but the rest of the studies (Gu et al., 2014a; Damiola et al., 2014; Song et al., 2015; Lo et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2006; Hsia et al., 2013) could not find any association between the A allele and cancer risk. In our meta-analysis, it was clear that the variant A allele resulted in cancer risk compared to the G allele. Homozygote, recessive and allele models could not show significant cancer risk with the A allele compared to the G allele. Homozygote dominant vs. Heterozygote (GG vs. GA) model also did not show any risk of cancer having A allele. However, Dominant model (GG vs. GA + AA), heterozygote vs. homozygote mutant (GA vs. AA) model showed significant cancer risk associated with A allele in comparison to the G allele. It would be interesting to determine the effect of interaction between the ATM rs189037 (G > A) polymorphism and various etiological habits such as smoking, alcohol consumption, betel-quid use etc. on lung cancer and head and neck cancer risk. However, the unavailability of required data in all the studies included in this meat-analysis restricted the evaluation.

Conclusion

This study provides for the first time conclusive evidence that ATM rs189037 (G > A) polymorphism is associated with risk of lung cancer and head and neck cancer, which may encourage further large scale population/hospital based case–control/cohort studies.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  27 in total

1.  Effects of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) genotypes and smoking habits on lung cancer risk in Taiwan.

Authors:  Te-Chun Hsia; Chia-Wen Tsai; Shinn-Jye Liang; Wen-Shin Chang; Liang-Yi Lin; Wei-Chun Chen; Chih-Yen Tu; Chang-Hai Tsai; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 2.  Advanced targeted therapies in cancer: Drug nanocarriers, the future of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Edgar Pérez-Herrero; Alberto Fernández-Medarde
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.571

Review 3.  DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer.

Authors:  Morgane Macheret; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 23.472

4.  Association between DNA repair gene ATM polymorphisms and oral cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Da-Tian Bau; Chao-Hsiang Chang; Ming-Hsui Tsai; Chang-Fang Chiu; Yung-An Tsou; Rou-Fen Wang; Chia-Wen Tsai; Ru-Yin Tsai
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  ATM polymorphisms and risk of lung cancer among never smokers.

Authors:  Yen-Li Lo; Chin-Fu Hsiao; Yuh-Shan Jou; Gee-Chen Chang; Ying-Huang Tsai; Wu-Chou Su; Yuh-Min Chen; Ming-Shyan Huang; Hui-Ling Chen; Pan-Chyr Yang; Chien-Jen Chen; Chao A Hsiung
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Genetic polymorphisms of ataxia telangiectasia mutated affect lung cancer risk.

Authors:  Jin Hee Kim; Heon Kim; Kye Young Lee; Kang-Hyeon Choe; Jeong-Seon Ryu; Ho Il Yoon; Sook Whan Sung; Keun-Young Yoo; Yun-Chul Hong
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid.

Authors:  C B Bennett; A L Lewis; K K Baldwin; M A Resnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Effect of single nucleotide polymorphism Rs189037 in ATM gene on risk of lung cancer in Chinese: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Xiaobo Wang; Yangwu Ren; Xuelian Li; Xichen Zhang; Baosen Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Multifunctional role of ATM/Tel1 kinase in genome stability: from the DNA damage response to telomere maintenance.

Authors:  Enea Gino Di Domenico; Elena Romano; Paola Del Porto; Fiorentina Ascenzioni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  9 in total

1.  GLTSCR1, ATM, PPP1R13L and CD3EAP Genetic Variants and Lung Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Jiao-Yang Yin; Ye-Gang Ma; Ulla Vogel; Dong-Hui Liu; Zhen-Xiang Sun
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

2.  Novel genetic variants in the P38MAPK pathway gene ZAK and susceptibility to lung cancer.

Authors:  Yun Feng; Yanru Wang; Hongliang Liu; Zhensheng Liu; Coleman Mills; Kouros Owzar; Jichun Xie; Younghun Han; David C Qian; Rayjean J Hung Rj; Yonathan Brhane; John McLaughlin; Paul Brennan; Heike Bickeböller; Albert Rosenberger; Richard S Houlston; Neil Caporaso; Maria Teresa Landi; Irene Brüske; Angela Risch; Yuanqing Ye; Xifeng Wu; David C Christiani; Christopher I Amos; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.784

3.  The role of histone modification and a regulatory single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs2071166) in the Cx43 promoter in patients with TOF.

Authors:  Ruoyi Gu; Jun Xu; Yixiang Lin; Wei Sheng; Duan Ma; Xiaojing Ma; Guoying Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The role of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated gene in lung cancer: recent advances in research.

Authors:  Yanling Xu; Peng Gao; Xuejiao Lv; Lin Zhang; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.031

5.  ATM rs189037 significantly increases the risk of cancer in non-smokers rather than smokers: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoxia He; Peng Wang; Ying Li; Na Shen
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  ATM gene polymorphisms are associated with poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer receiving radiation therapy.

Authors:  Junjun Mou; Tao Hu; Zhiwu Wang; Wei Chen; Yang Wang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  The most frequent Polish ATM mutations are not susceptibility factors for tobacco-related cancers.

Authors:  Marta Podralska; Agnieszka Dzikiewicz-Krawczyk; Maria Mosor; Magdalena Żurawek; Katarzyna Iżykowska; Ryszard Słomski; Małgorzata Rydzanicz; Piotr Gabryel; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz; Iwona Ziółkowska-Suchanek
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Association of ATM and BMI-1 genetic variation with breast cancer risk in Han Chinese.

Authors:  Li-Ling Yue; Fu-Chao Wang; Ming-Long Zhang; Dan Liu; Ping Chen; Qing-Bu Mei; Peng-Hui Li; Hong-Ming Pan; Li-Hong Zheng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  ATM rs189037 (G > A) polymorphism increased the risk of cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Liang Zhao; Lu Xia; Cong Zhao; Jun Yao
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.103

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.