| Literature DB >> 26504557 |
Tongkun Liu1, Yu Qian1, Weike Duan1, Jun Ren1, Xilin Hou1, Ying Li1.
Abstract
Mitochondria are the energy sources of plant cells and are involved in regulating cell development. Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase iron-sulfur protein, which is necessary for mitochondrial respiration, is a subunit of mitochondrial electron transport chain multimeric enzyme complexes. To better understand the biological function of the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase iron-sulfur protein, the full-length cDNA of BcRISP1 was cloned; it was found to contain 810 base pairs and encode 269 amino acids. Unusually, high expression of the BcRISP1 gene in the archesporial cell stages was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis of cytoplasmic male sterile lines and maintainer lines. The seed set was affected by the overexpression of BcRISP1, and shorter siliques with lower seed sets were observed in 35S::BcRISP1 Arabidopsis plants. These characteristics may have resulted from the reduced formation of pollen and impaired pollen tube growth. qRT-PCR results revealed that in 35S::BcRISP1 plants, the expression levels of the mitochondrial respiratory chain-related genes, COX10 and RIP1, were enhanced, whereas the expression levels of QCR7 and SDH2-1 were reduced. This result implies that overexpression of BcRISP1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants may disrupt the mitochondrial electron transport chain by affecting the expression of mitochondrial respiratory chain-related genes and therefore, reducing the seed set.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 26504557 PMCID: PMC4596333 DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2014.62
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hortic Res ISSN: 2052-7276 Impact factor: 6.793
Primers used in this study
| Gene name | Direction | Sequence (5′–3′) | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | ATG CTG CGA ATT GCA GGG A | ORF cloning | |
| R1 | ACC AAT GAG TAA CTT GTT CT | ORF cloning | |
| F2 | GCT ATC AAA ACA CCT AAC TC | For qRT-PCR in non-heading Chinese cabbage | |
| R2 | ATT AGG CAA GGG GAT ACA CC | For qRT-PCR in non-heading Chinese cabbage | |
| F | AGA TTA TCC CAT CTC CAA T | For qRT-PCR in | |
| R | AGG CAA AAC CTA ACT CAT | For qRT-PCR in | |
| F | CCA CTA ACT GCC TTG CTC CAC | For qRT-PCR in non-heading Chinese cabbage | |
| R | GCT TGC CCT CAG ATT CCT CCT | For qRT-PCR in non-heading Chinese cabbage | |
| F | GCC TTC AGG ACG TAT TAG TG | For qRT-PCR in | |
| R | TTG ATA GGG TGA AGT TGC TT | For qRT-PCR in | |
| F | TTA AAG GAA TAT CCG CAA AG | For qRT-PCR in | |
| R | ATC TCT GCT CAA ATG GGT TA | For qRT-PCR in | |
| F | CTA AGT GGA TAT GTT GCT A | For qRT-PCR in | |
| R | CTT AAA CGA TTC TGA GAG A | For qRT-PCR in | |
| F | GCT TGA TGG GAT GTA TGA AT | For qRT-PCR in | |
| R | GTC GTC AAT AGC CTC AAG TC | For qRT-PCR in | |
| F | TCG TCC TAC TTT GTG GAG TGG | For qRT-PCR in | |
| R | CTC GCC TGA ACA TCT CTT GG | For qRT-PCR in |
Abbreviations: F, forward, R, reverse.
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank data library under the Arabidopsis accession numbers: BcRISP1 (not logged), GAPDH (AB367451.1), SDH2-1 (At3g27380), QCR7 (At4g32470), COX10 (At2g44520), RIP1 (At5g13440) and TUB2 (At5g62690).
Figure 1Homology analysis of BcRISP1. (a) Amino-acid sequence alignment of BcRISP1 and related proteins from diverse plants. The location of the UCR_TM and Rieske domains in BcRISP1 was from Ala77 to Asp141 and Val170 to Lys266, respectively. Sequences were aligned using Clustal X2. (b) Phylogenetic analysis of the BcRISP1 gene. Alignments were based on protein sequences deduced from cDNA or genomic clones. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA 5.0 software using the neighbor-joining method. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 replications. Sequences were obtained from: Bc, Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis (not logged); Br, Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis (Bra006199); Al, Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. Lyrata (XP_002873613.1); At, Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_568288.1); Pt, Populus trichocarpa (XP_002304638.1); Rc, Ricinus communis (XP_002512673.1); Vv, Vitis vinifera (XP_002271311.1); St, Solanum tuberosum (ABA81878.1); Os, Oryza sativa Japonica Group (NP_001046975.1); Zm, Zea mays (NP_001131229.1); Mt, Medicago truncatula (XP_003624512.1).
Figure 2Expression levels of the BcRISP1 gene during bud development in non-heading Chinese cabbage. M1, M2, M3 and M4 maintainer buds at different sizes (<0.5, 1.5, 2.5 and >3.5 mm), M5 maintainer leaves; S1, S2, S3 and S4 Pol CMS buds at different sizes (<0.6, 1.8, 3.0 and >4.5 mm), S5 maintainer leaves. Poly(A)+-mRNA was isolated from buds at different development stages, converted to cDNA and quantified by qRT-PCR. Each data point represents mean±s.e. (n=3).
Figure 3Effects of BcRISP1 on mitochondrial respiratory chain-related gene expression. (a) BcRISP1 expression levels in wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 Arabidopsis. (b) ROS content of mitochondria in 35S::BcRISP1 Arabidopsis buds. All tests used equivalent mitochondrial quantities and were repeated three times. Significantly different from wild type at *P<0.05. The results are expressed as averages±s.d. (c) Expression levels of COX10 (At2g44520), RIP1 (At5g13440), QCR7 (At4g32470) and SDH2-1 (At3g27380) in wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 Arabidopsis as determined by qRT-PCR. W1, W2 and W3, wild-type plants at vegetative, bolting and flowering stages, respectively; T1, T2 and T3, transgenic plants at vegetative, bolting and flowering stages, respectively. Error bars represent s.d. in three transgenic plants.
Figure 4Flower and fruit phenotypes in wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 Arabidopsis plants. (a) Detailed view of wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 flowers at a similar developmental stage with sepals and petals removed. (b) Wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 siliques. (c) Opened mature wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 siliques. (d) Whole plant wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 phenotypes. (e) Apical part of the main inflorescence stem from wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 plants. (f) Comparison of silique size between wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1. (g) Comparison of seed number between wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1. Significantly different from wild-type at *P<0.05. The results are expressed as averages±s.d. in three transgenic plants. Values represent means±s.e. (n=10) in three transgenic plants.
Figure 5Phenotypic characterization of pollen produced from transgenic and wild-type Arabidopsis plants. (a) Pollen grains from wild-type plants stained with TTC solution. (b) Pollen grains from 35S::BcRISP1 plants stained with TTC solution. (c) Total numbers of pollen grains in an anther from wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 plants. (d) In vitro germination of pollen from wild-type plants. (e) In vitro germination of pollen from 35S::BcRISP1 plants. (f) Germination rates of pollen grains from wild-type and 35S::BcRISP1 plants. Results are given as averages±s.d.