| Literature DB >> 26504475 |
Zoe L Hewett1, Birinder S Cheema2, Kate L Pumpa3, Caroline A Smith4.
Abstract
Bikram yoga is a style of hatha yoga involving a standarized series of asanas performed to an instructional dialogue in a heated environment (40.6°C, 40% humidity). Several studies evaluating the effect of Bikram yoga on health-related outcomes have been published over the past decade. However, to date, there are no comprehensive reviews of this research and there remains a lack of large-scale, robustly-designed randomised controlled trials (RCT) of Bikram yoga training. The purpose of this review is to contextualise and summarise trials that have evaluated the effects of Bikram yoga on health and to provide recommendations for future research. According to published literature, Bikram yoga has been shown to improve lower body strength, lower and upper body range of motion, and balance in healthy adults. Non-RCTs report that Bikram yoga may, in some populations, improve glucose tolerance, bone mineral density, blood lipid profile, arterial stiffness, mindfulness, and perceived stress. There is vast potential for further, improved research into the effects of Bikram yoga, particularly in unhealthy populations, to better understand intervention-related adaptations and their influence on the progression of chronic disease. Future research should adhere to CONSORT guidelines for better design and reporting to improve research quality in this field.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26504475 PMCID: PMC4609431 DOI: 10.1155/2015/428427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Bikram yoga series.
Characteristics of Bikram trials reviewed.
| Study identification | Country | Sample size | Population | Sex (M/F) | Mean age (years) | Treatments | Control conditions | Trial duration (weeks) | Outcome measures | Main findings | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major inclusion criteria | Major exclusion criteria | ||||||||||
| Randomized controlled trial | |||||||||||
| Tracy and Hart, 2013 [ | USA | 21 | Apparently healthy, relatively sedentary (<2 hours/week purposeful exercise <moderate intensity, one active subject in the yoga group and one in the control group) | Medical condition or medication that could influence participation or dependent measures and yoga practice within 4 months prior to study | M/F | 27 | Bikram's beginner's yoga class (room heated to 40°C, 40% humidity, same 26 | No treatment | 8 | Physical strength (isometric deadlift, hand grip strength, MVC of knee extensors/elbow flexors, concentric/eccentric steadiness), functional fitness (sit-and-reach and shoulder flexibility, single-leg balance), cardiovascular fitness (VO2max, resting BP), body composition (fat mass and lean body mass using DEXA) | Increased isometric deadlift strength ( |
|
| |||||||||||
| Controlled trials | |||||||||||
|
Hunter et al., 2013 [ | USA | Young = 14 | Sedentary (<2 days/week physical activity for past 6 months), lean participants BMI 18.5–24.9 and obese participants BMI >30 | Smoking within last 6 months, uncontrolled diabetes, personal history of stroke, prior myocardial infarction, and known coronary heart disease | M/F | Young = 32 | Bikram's beginner's yoga class (room heated to 40°C, 40% humidity, same 26 | No nonyoga control | 8 | Glucose tolerance (75 g GTT, FPG) body composition (fat mass and lean body mass using DEXA, BMI, body mass) | Increased glucose tolerance in obese subjects ( |
|
Hunter et al., 2013 [ | USA | Young = 24 | Sedentary (no habitual activity over last 6 months), young participants aged 18–39 and older participants aged 40–70 | Pregnancy, uncontrolled hypertension, infection within last 4 weeks, renal disease, adrenal or endocrine tumours, prior myocardial infarction, known coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure, personal history of stroke or cardiac arrhythmias, diabetes, heat intolerance, and cardiovascular or hormone replacement therapy medications | M/F | Young = 30 | Bikram's beginner's yoga class (room heated to 40°C, 40% humidity, same 26 | No nonyoga control | 8 | Arterial stiffness (carotid artery compliance, carotid pulse pressure), body composition (body mass, fat mass using DEXA), blood glucose measures (HbA1c, FBG, plasma insulin, HOMA-IR), cardiovascular health (total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, BP), flexibility (sit-and-reach) | Increased carotid artery compliance in young adults ( |
|
| |||||||||||
| Uncontrolled trials | |||||||||||
| Hewett et al., 2011 [ | USA | 51 | NR | Bikram yoga practice at all in past 3 months and long term within last 2 years and medical conditions that did not pass medical clearance for participation | M/F | 32 | Bikram's beginner's yoga class (room heated to 40°C, 40% humidity, same 26 | No control | 8 | Psychological health (perceived stress, mindfulness), cardiovascular fitness (predicted VO2max, RHR), physical fitness (sit-and-reach and shoulder flexibility, single-leg balance) | Increased mindfulness ( |
| Kudesia and Bianchi, 2012 [ | USA | 13 | Apparently healthy, were planning to start or already practicing Bikram yoga | Medical problems or medications that might interfere with sleep monitor's algorithm (e.g., epilepsy) | M/F | 35 | Bikram's beginner's yoga class (room heated to 40°C, 40% humidity, same 26 | N/A | 2 | Sleep architecture (time spent in each sleep-wake stage, duration of awakenings) | Decreased duration of awakenings on days of Bikram yoga practice (more rapid return to sleep after nocturnal awakenings) |
|
| |||||||||||
| Longitudinal study | |||||||||||
| Sangiorgio et al., 2014 [ | USA | 9 | Female (30–59 y), certified Bikram yoga instructors, practicing minimum 3 years, good physical health | NR | F | 51 (at 5-year follow-up) | Continued practice of Bikram's beginner's yoga class (room heated to 40°C, 40% humidity, same 26 | N/A | 5 years | Bone mineral density (using DEXA to measure at the spine and hip, and total body) | Premenopausal women at follow-up showed mean increased BMD at the femoral neck (6.6% ± 5.5%), total hip (2.0% ± 3.8%), and lumbar spine (1% ± 4.7%). Postmenopausal women at follow-up showed mean decrease in BMD at the femoral neck (−6.0% ± 6.6%), total hip (−8.1% ± 6.1%), and lumbar spine (−5.6% ± 9.1%). |
|
| |||||||||||
| Cross-sectional and acute studies | |||||||||||
| Pate and Buono, 2014 [ | USA | 26 | Healthy adults (18–57 y), current Bikram practitioners with varying levels of experience (<20 classes and >20 classes) | Positive responses on PAR-Q and pregnancy | M/F | 33 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acute response to Bikram yoga session in temperature controlled chamber (40°C, 40% humidity) including metabolic (VO2), cardiovascular (HR), and sweat rate response | Average overall VO2 9.5 mL/kg/min, average overall intensity 2.9 METS, average overall EE/session 286 kcal (179–478), and higher relative EE for more experienced practitioners |
| Abel et al., 2012 [ | USA | LE = 17 | Apparently healthy adults | Signs or symptoms of heart, pulmonary, or metabolic disease | M/F | LE = 44 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Pulmonary function (FVC, FEV1, FVC/FEV1, PEFR, MVV), cardiovascular fitness (VO2max, RHR, BP) | Weak correlation of Bikram experience with FEV1 ( |
|
Fritz et al. 2013 [ | USA | 19 | Current Bikram yoga practitioners attending ≥2 classes/week for at least 1 year | NR | M/F | 30 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acute response to Bikram yoga session in temperature controlled chamber (40°C, 40% humidity) including metabolic (VO2), cardiovascular (HR), and thermal (internal temperature) response and RPE | Average VO2 13 mL/kg/min, average RPE 4.5, average HR 134 BPM, average overall intensity 3.7 METs, overall EE 333–459 kcal, and elevated core temperature within safe range (max 101.6°F) |
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; BPM, beats per minute; CV, coefficient of variation; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EE, energy expenditure; EEG, electroencephalogram; F, female; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FVC, forced vital capacity; GTT, glucose tolerance test; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; HE, high experience; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance; HR, heart rate; LE, low experience; M, male; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MVC, maximal voluntary contraction; MVV, maximum voluntary ventilation; NR, not reported; PAR-Q, physical activity readiness questionnaire; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; RHR, resting heart rate; RPE, rate of perceived exertion; VO2, volume of oxygen uptake.