Literature DB >> 26504419

Diagnostic value of terminal ileum biopsies in patients with abnormal terminal ileum mucosal appearance.

Mehmet Velidedeoğlu1, A Enes Arıkan1, A Kağan Zengin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the necessity of obtaining routine ileal biopsy during colonoscopy in the patients with abnormal terminal ileum mucosal appearance if the inflammatory bowel disease is not considered.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for 57 patients who were referred to a private hospital for colonoscopy between January 2008 and February 2009, in whom terminal ileum intubation was achieved and an abnormal appearance was observed.
RESULTS: There were 33 men and 24 women; the mean age was 44.12±11.42 years. In 22 patients, the abnormality was ulcers and/or erosions. In 10 patients, there were mucosal nodularity and in 24, the finding was erythema. The time to reach to ileum from cecum was 28.78±24.30 s. The mean length of the examined ileum was 12.93±6.05 cm. There was no difference between groups according to distance covered in the ileum for diagnostic yield, but going further than 2 cm was important.
CONCLUSION: There should be no need to obtain routine biopsy in patients with abnormal terminal ileum mucosa appearance, when inflammatory bowel disease is not considered. In these patients, histopathology also reveals non-specific ileitis. Furthermore, in these patients, the macroscopic pathological diagnosis overlaps the histopathology, and it has a low diagnostic yield and lower clinical significance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; biopsy; terminal ileum

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504419      PMCID: PMC4605111          DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2015.2756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg        ISSN: 1300-0705


  31 in total

1.  Small bowel obstruction caused by colonoscopy.

Authors:  S A Malki; M L Bassett; P Pavli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Is routine ileoscopy useful? An observational study of procedure times, diagnostic yield, and learning curve.

Authors:  Srilekha Cherian; Pradip Singh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  It is not worthwhile to perform ileoscopy on all patients.

Authors:  K K Y Yoong; T Heymann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree?

Authors:  J B Marshall; D N Brown
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Is ileoscopy with biopsy worthwhile in patients presenting with symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease?

Authors:  K Geboes; N Ectors; G D'Haens; P Rutgeerts
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Endoscopy of the terminal ileum. Diagnostic yield in 400 consecutive examinations.

Authors:  G Börsch; G Schmidt
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Isolated cytomegalovirus ileitis detected by colonoscopy.

Authors:  S M Lepinski; J W Hamilton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Seong Hyun Jeong; Kwang Jae Lee; Yeong Bae Kim; Heok Chun Kwon; Sung Jae Sin; Jae Yeon Chung
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.029

10.  Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Bergein F Overholt; Terry Box; Cynthia Kelsey Winker
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  The efficacy of mesalazine on nonspecific terminal ileal ulcers: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Junrong Li; Fangmei Ling; Di Guo; Jinfang Zhao; Ling Cheng; Yidong Chen; Mingyang Xu; Liangru Zhu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.988

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.