| Literature DB >> 26504349 |
Tamotsu Yabumoto1, Sohee Shin2, Tsuneo Watanabe1, Yusuke Watanabe3, Toru Naka4, Kazuo Oguri5, Toshio Matsuoka1.
Abstract
[Purpose] Strength training is recommended for children with cerebral palsy. However, it is difficult for moderately impaired children with cerebral palsy, who require crutches for ambulation, to participate in this type of training. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether whole-body vibration training is an effective method of strengthening in a moderately impaired child with cerebral palsy. [Subject and Methods] This report describes an 8-year-old Japanese boy with cerebral palsy, who was ambulatory with crutches. The subject participated in physical therapy twice a week for 5 weeks. Whole-body vibration training was selected to complement the standing practice. The patient's crutch-walking ability, gross motor function, and spasticity were evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Walking ability; Whole-body vibration
Year: 2015 PMID: 26504349 PMCID: PMC4616150 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.3023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Walking ability of the subject (5-m walk test with crutches)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | r | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (sec) | 91.0 | 54.2 | 51.5 | 37.5 | 45.7 | 43.7 | 37.4 | 36.2 | 37.4 | 32.8 | 0.93 |
| Number of steps | 43.5 | 37.5 | 35.5 | 33.5 | 36.0 | 35.5 | 32.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 29.5 |
The values represent the average of 2 measurements. r: regression coefficient of the duration and number of steps
Modified Tardieu scale (ROM°: deg)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1 | 20.0 | 35.0 | 32.5 | 32.5 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 17.5 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| V3 | −15.0 | −5.0 | −7.5 | −2.5 | −7.5 | −2.5 | 2.5 | −2.5 | −2.5 | 0.0 |
| R2–R1 | 35.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 35.0 | 27.5 | 32.5 | 20.0 | 12.5 | 22.5 | 20.0 |
Joint angle of ankle (Average of the left and right sides). V1: As slow as possible (slower than the natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). V3: As fast as possible (faster than the rate of natural drop of the limb segment under gravity). R2–R1: The difference between slow (V1) and fast (V3) ankle dorsiflexion
Changes in the gross motor function measure (GMFM) before and after intervention
| Domain | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| C: Crawling and kneeling | 33/42 (78.6%) | 36/42 (85.7%) |
| D: Standing | 14/39 (35.9%) | 17/39 (43.6%) |