Literature DB >> 26504341

Effect of a suspension seat support chair on the trunk flexion angle and gluteal pressure during computer work.

Won-Gyu Yoo1.   

Abstract

[Purpose] We assessed the effects of a suspension seat support chair on the trunk flexion angle and gluteal pressure during computer work. [Subjects] Ten males were recruited. [Methods] The suspension seat support was developed to prevent abnormal gluteal pressure and a slumped sitting posture during computer work. The gluteal pressure was measured with a TekScan system and the trunk flexion angle was measured with a video camera, to compare the differences between a general chair and the suspension seat support.
[Results] The gluteal peak pressures were decreased significantly in the suspension seat support versus the general chair. The trunk flexion angle was also decreased significantly in the suspension seat support compared with the general chair. [Conclusions] This study suggests that the suspension seat support chair contributes to preventing abnormal gluteal pressure and a slumped sitting posture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gluteal pressure; Seat support; Slump sitting

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504341      PMCID: PMC4616142          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.2989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

Prolonged sitting postures in combination with poor workstation ergonomics have been implicated in the development of musculoskeletal problems during visual display terminal work1). Theoretically, a flexed-relaxed posture results in a higher load at the spine and lower muscle activation of the trunk compared with sitting upright, which may lead to excessive stress on passive structures, such as ligaments and discs, and act as a risk factor for low back pain2). Recent findings have indicated that a prolonged flexed-relaxed posture may provoke symptoms of low back pain and may also be associated with neck and shoulder pain3). Thus, various ergonomic interventions have been suggested that help to maintain a neutral spinal alignment and prevent a slumped posture4). Localized pressure on the skin surface is believed to cause blockage of capillary blood flow and subsequent ischemic damage5). Localized stresses are generated even during contact with a deformable surface, such as an air cushion, and they cause deformation of soft tissues and exacerbation of pressure sores6). Thus, in this study, we developed a suspension seat support for preventing abnormal gluteal pressure and a slumped sitting posture in computer work. The purpose of the study was to show the effects of a suspension seat support chair on the trunk flexion angle and gluteal pressure during computer work.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study subjects were 10 males aged 28.2±3.9 years (mean±SD) whose average height and weight were 175.7±4.7 cm and 68.1±6.3 kg, respectively. Subjects with conditions that might have affected trunk mobility, such as injuries or neurologic deficits of the hip and lower extremities during the previous year, were excluded from the study. Subjects received an explanation of the purpose and methods of the study prior to their participation and provided informed consent according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The TekScan system was used to measure the location and magnitude of the peak pressures. The software supplied with the TekScan system was used to locate areas of interest, and display temporal forces and pressures on a monitor. We compared the mean peak pressures of left and right gluteal portions between a general chair and the suspension seat support chair during 30 min of computer work. The trunk flexion angle of each subject during the VDT work was measured using a single video camera. Three reflective markers 14 mm in diameter were placed by the same investigator. The trunk flexion angle was measured as the angle between the line of the left acromion to the L1 spinous process and the line from the L1 spinous process to the left greater trochanter. The values of the trunk flexion angles were measured and recorded by a digital camera, and the video motion analysis Pro-Trainer 10.1 software (Sports Motion, Cardiff, CA, USA) was used to analyze the kinematic data. Images were obtained at a sampling rate of 30 Hz for digitalization. All subjects performed randomly two computer typing work periods, each of 30 min, using a general chair and the suspension seat support chair. To ensure that the hips and knees were flexed at 90°, an adjustable-height table and chair without a backrest were used to set the initial sitting posture. The general chair consisted of a 40 × 40 cm foam-cushion seat support, height-adjustable chair (D model of H company). We adjusted the distance from the seat surface to the floor using the height-adjustable seat support. The suspension seat support chair consisted of fabric textile materials. The suspension seat support chair is similar to side-X stools, but has a backrest. The suspension seat support was collapsed to align between the sidebars, either down between the front legs, or up to align between back-sidebars. The paired t-test with the SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the significance of differences between the general chair and the suspension seat support chair. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean peak contact pressure of the gluteal portion in the suspension seat support chair (32.1±10.0 mmHg) was decreased significantly compared with the general chair (48.4±12.9 mmHg; p < 0.05). The trunk flexion angle in the suspension seat support chair (19.8±10.4°) was decreased significantly compared with the general chair (29.9±13.6°; p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a suspension seat support on the trunk flexion angle and gluteal pressure during computer work. The results showed that the gluteal peak pressure was decreased significantly in the suspension seat support, compared with the general chair. Localized stresses are generated even during contact with a deformable surface, such as a cushion, and they cause deformation of soft tissues and exacerbation of pressure sores5). Without dynamic pressure redistribution or repositioning, these areas, when in contact with dense materials, eventually lose the ability to reduce the load and excessive load on soft tissue remains largely unrelieved6). The results here showed the effect of the suspension seat support chair on gluteal pressure reduction. This result indicates that the suspension seat support has the capability to reposition when computer workers ‘swing’ on the suspension seat support during computer work. The results also showed that the trunk flexion angle was decreased significantly in the suspension seat support compared to general chair. van Dieen et al. showed that dynamic office chairs potentially offer advantages over fixed chairs7). This led to suggestions that dynamic changes in the sitting position with frequent posture changes are beneficial8). Vergara and Page suggested that large changes in sitting posture are indicative of discomfort while small movements are necessary to alleviate pain caused by static lumbar and pelvic postures9). Thus, this study suggests that the suspension seat support chair contributes to preventing abnormal pressure in the gluteal and thigh portions and a slumped sitting posture.
  8 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic office chairs on trunk kinematics, trunk extensor EMG and spinal shrinkage.

Authors:  J H van Dieën; M P de Looze; V Hermans
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-06-10       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Relationship between comfort and back posture and mobility in sitting-posture.

Authors:  Margarita Vergara; Alvaro Page
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Effects of a proximity-sensing feedback chair on head, shoulder, and trunk postures when working at a visual display terminal.

Authors:  Won-gyu Yoo; Chung-hwi Yi; Min-hee Kim
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

4.  Prevalence, risk factors and prevention of pressure ulcers in Dutch intensive care units. Results of a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  G J Bours; E De Laat; R J Halfens; M Lubbers
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The relationship beween posture and back muscle endurance in industrial workers with flexion-related low back pain.

Authors:  Peter B O'Sullivan; Tim Mitchell; Paul Bulich; Rob Waller; Johan Holte
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-06-13

6.  A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders.

Authors:  Michele Marcus; Fredric Gerr; Carolyn Monteilh; Daniel J Ortiz; Eileen Gentry; Susan Cohen; Alicia Edwards; Cindy Ensor; David Kleinbaum
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Sitting with adjustable ischial and back supports: biomechanical changes.

Authors:  Mohsen Makhsous; Fang Lin; Ronald W Hendrix; Matthew Hepler; Li-Qun Zhang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The influence of different sitting postures on head/neck posture and muscle activity.

Authors:  Joao Paulo Caneiro; Peter O'Sullivan; Angus Burnett; Avi Barach; David O'Neil; Orjan Tveit; Karolina Olafsdottir
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2009-07-29
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effects of a dynamic chair on pelvic mobility, fatigue, and work efficiency during work performed while sitting: a comparison of dynamic sitting and static sitting.

Authors:  Hironori Tanoue; Toshitaka Mitsuhashi; Shunji Sako; Ryokichi Goto; Tomohiro Nakai; Ryoichi Inaba
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-06-28

2.  A preliminary study of the measurement of external ischial tuberosity width and its gender differences.

Authors:  Yi-Lang Chen; Ping-Jui Yang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.