| Literature DB >> 26504293 |
Yi-Ning Wu1, Keith W Hallbourg1, Sean M Collins2.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study was performed to examine the relationship between physical performance and muscle properties during police cadet training. The study's hypothesis was that improved physical performance brought about by training, would in turn cause a reduction in muscle flexibility.Entities:
Keywords: Flexibility; Muscle property; Police cadet
Year: 2015 PMID: 26504293 PMCID: PMC4616094 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.2783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Descriptive characteristics of subjects at the time of recruitment
| Male (n=41) | Female (n=10) | Overall (n=51) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 27 (3.8) | 24.9 (3.2) | 26.6 (3.7) |
| Height (cm) | 177.4 (9.3) | 166.8 (7.2) | 175 (9.9) |
| Weight (kg) | 85.2 (15.6) | 64.5 (37.7) | 81.2 (17.2) |
| Body fat (%) | 15.6 (6.1) | 22.8 (13.3) | 17.0 (6.7) |
Values are Mean (SD)
Fig. 1.Experimental setup for evaluating the biomechanical properties of the hamstring and the calf compound. A device containing a pressure plate and an inflatable ball connected to an electric pump was connected to a computer to record the tension changes during passive stretching. The device was activated manually using a ‘dead man’ switch so that the experimenter could stop ball inflation by taking a finger off the switch.
Fig. 2.An example of the pressure data measured by the device during the test in two consecutive sessions (before and after the police cadet training). The decay curve indicates the stretched muscle became more relaxed over the one minute of stretching resulting in less pressure being applied to the inflated ball. The initial stretch force indicates the resistance caused by the stretched leg.
Body size and composition
| Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | Body fat (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
| Pre | 175.4 (9.4) | 82.1 (16.2) | 17.0 (6.3) |
| 1st Eval | 175.8 (8.9) | 82.0 (16.1) | 16.0 (5.8)* |
| 2nd Eval | 175.8 (8.9) | 80.1 (15.2)*^ | 16.3 (5.6) |
| 3rd Eval | 175.9 (9.5) | 79.8 (14.4)*^ | 16.5 (5.6) |
Values are Mean (SD). *: p<0.0125 compared to Pre session, ^: p<0.0125 compared to second session
Time course changes in general fitness of the police cadets
| Sit- up | 1.5 mile run | Sit-and-reach | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 36.1 (8.0) | 710.6 (67.3) | 17.3 (2.4) |
| 1st Eval | 41.0 (7.4)* | 653.8 (63.9)* | 18.4 (2.2)* |
| 2nd Eval | 43.5 (7.1)*^ | 641.5 (81.7)* | 19.1 (2.3)*^ |
| 3rd Eval | 45.0 (6.0)*^# | 641.2 (84.2)* | 19.9 (2.1)*^# |
Values are Mean (SD). * p<0.0125 compared to Pre session, ^: p<0.0125 compared to Post session, #: p<0.05 compared to the previous session
Biomechanical properties of the hamstring and calf compound
| ISF (dominant) | ISF (non-dominant) | Relx (dominant) | Relx (non-dominant) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 10.73 (2.94) | 10.03 (2.46) | −0.0079 (0.0118) | −0.0075 (0.0135) |
| 1st Eval | 9.63 (2.76) | 9.66 (2.67) | −0.0061 (0.01054) | −0.0055 (0.01322) |
| 2nd Eval | 9.43 (2.55)* | 9.53 (2.62) | −0.0079 (0.01162) | −0.0101 (0.0119) |
| 3rd Eval | 9.23 (2.61)* | 8.96 (2.31)* | −0.0035 (0.02329) | −0.0039 (0.1314)# |
Values are Mean (SD). *: p<0.0125 compared to Pre session, #: p<0.0125 compared to the previous session