Literature DB >> 26504239

The incidence and role of negative citations in science.

Christian Catalini1, Nicola Lacetera2, Alexander Oettl3.   

Abstract

Citations to previous literature are extensively used to measure the quality and diffusion of knowledge. However, we know little about the different ways in which a study can be cited; in particular, are papers cited to point out their merits or their flaws? We elaborated a methodology to characterize "negative" citations using bibliometric data and natural language processing. We found that negative citations concerned higher-quality papers, were focused on a study's findings rather than theories or methods, and originated from scholars who were closer to the authors of the focal paper in terms of discipline and social distance, but not geographically. Receiving a negative citation was also associated with a slightly faster decline in citations to the paper in the long run.

Keywords:  bibliometric techniques; citation analysis; natural-language processing; negative citations; social studies of science

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504239      PMCID: PMC4653214          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1502280112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited.

Authors:  J M Campanario
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.

Authors:  R K Merton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The retraction penalty: evidence from the Web of Science.

Authors:  Susan Feng Lu; Ginger Zhe Jin; Brian Uzzi; Benjamin Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Viswas Chhapola; Soumya Tiwari; Bobbity Deepthi; Sandeep Kumar Kanwal
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Kevin Boyack; Paul F Wouters
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Bibliometrics for Social Validation.

Authors:  Daniel J Hicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration.

Authors:  Bedoor K AlShebli; Talal Rahwan; Wei Lee Woon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Effects of seniority, gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients.

Authors:  David G Pina; Lana Barać; Ivan Buljan; Francisco Grimaldo; Ana Marušić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Early-career setback and future career impact.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Benjamin F Jones; Dashun Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Assessment of Citations of the Retracted Article by Wakefield et al With Fraudulent Claims of an Association Between Vaccination and Autism.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Suelzer; Jennifer Deal; Karen L Hanus; Barbara Ruggeri; Rita Sieracki; Elizabeth Witkowski
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-11-01

8.  Impact of lexical and sentiment factors on the popularity of scientific papers.

Authors:  Julian Sienkiewicz; Eduardo G Altmann
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials.

Authors:  Edward Kim; Kevin Huang; Alex Tomala; Sara Matthews; Emma Strubell; Adam Saunders; Andrew McCallum; Elsa Olivetti
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature.

Authors:  Wout S Lamers; Kevin Boyack; Vincent Larivière; Cassidy R Sugimoto; Nees Jan van Eck; Ludo Waltman; Dakota Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.