Literature DB >> 26504210

Atlantic hurricane surge response to geoengineering.

John C Moore1, Aslak Grinsted2, Xiaoran Guo3, Xiaoyong Yu3, Svetlana Jevrejeva4, Annette Rinke5, Xuefeng Cui3, Ben Kravitz6, Andrew Lenton7, Shingo Watanabe8, Duoying Ji9.   

Abstract

Devastating floods due to Atlantic hurricanes are relatively rare events. However, the frequency of the most intense storms is likely to increase with rises in sea surface temperatures. Geoengineering by stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection cools the tropics relative to the polar regions, including the hurricane Main Development Region in the Atlantic, suggesting that geoengineering may mitigate hurricanes. We examine this hypothesis using eight earth system model simulations of climate under the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G3 and G4 schemes that use stratospheric aerosols to reduce the radiative forcing under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 scenario. Global mean temperature increases are greatly ameliorated by geoengineering, and tropical temperature increases are at most half of those temperature increases in the RCP4.5. However, sulfate injection would have to double (to nearly 10 teragrams of SO2 per year) between 2020 and 2070 to balance the RCP4.5, approximately the equivalent of a 1991 Pinatubo eruption every 2 y, with consequent implications for stratospheric ozone. We project changes in storm frequencies using a temperature-dependent generalized extreme value statistical model calibrated by historical storm surges and observed temperatures since 1923. The number of storm surge events as big as the one caused by the 2005 Katrina hurricane are reduced by about 50% compared with no geoengineering, but this reduction is only marginally statistically significant. Nevertheless, when sea level rise differences in 2070 between the RCP4.5 and geoengineering are factored into coastal flood risk, we find that expected flood levels are reduced by about 40 cm for 5-y events and about halved for 50-y surges.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate engineering; extremes; flooding

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504210      PMCID: PMC4653138          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510530112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability.

Authors:  Ben B B Booth; Nick J Dunstone; Paul R Halloran; Timothy Andrews; Nicolas Bellouin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Strong association between west african rainfall and u.s. Landfall of intense hurricanes.

Authors:  W M Gray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Downscaling CMIP5 climate models shows increased tropical cyclone activity over the 21st century.

Authors:  Kerry A Emanuel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The surge standard for "events of Katrina magnitude".

Authors:  Andrew Brian Kennedy; Joel Casey Dietrich; Joannes J Westerink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reply to Kennedy et al.: Katrina storm records in tide gauges.

Authors:  Aslak Grinsted; John C Moore; Svetlana Jevrejeva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes.

Authors:  Simone Tilmes; Rolf Müller; Ross Salawitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Homogeneous record of Atlantic hurricane surge threat since 1923.

Authors:  Aslak Grinsted; John C Moore; Svetlana Jevrejeva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Projected Atlantic hurricane surge threat from rising temperatures.

Authors:  Aslak Grinsted; John C Moore; Svetlana Jevrejeva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise.

Authors:  J C Moore; S Jevrejeva; A Grinsted
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Developing countries must lead on solar geoengineering research.

Authors:  A Atiq Rahman; Paulo Artaxo; Asfawossen Asrat; Andy Parker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Impacts of hemispheric solar geoengineering on tropical cyclone frequency.

Authors:  Anthony C Jones; James M Haywood; Nick Dunstone; Kerry Emanuel; Matthew K Hawcroft; Kevin I Hodges; Andy Jones
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Mitigation of Arctic permafrost carbon loss through stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.

Authors:  Yating Chen; Aobo Liu; John C Moore
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.