Literature DB >> 26503840

Pullout performance comparison of pedicle screws based on cement application and design parameters.

Tolga Tolunay1, Cemile Başgül2, Teyfik Demir3, Mesut E Yaman4, Arslan K Arslan1.   

Abstract

Pedicle screws are the main fixation devices for certain surgeries. Pedicle screw loosening is a common problem especially for osteoporotic incidents. Cannulated screws with cement augmentation are widely used for that kind of cases. Dual lead dual cored pedicle screw has already given promising pullout values without augmentation. This study concentrates on the usage of dual lead dual core with cement augmentation as an alternative to cannulated and standard pedicle screws with cement augmentation. Five groups (dual lead dual core, normal pedicle screw and cannulated pedicle screw with augmentation, normal pedicle screw, dual lead dual cored pedicle screw) were designed for this study. Healthy bovine vertebrae and synthetic polyurethane foams (grade 20) were used as embedding test medium. Test samples were prepared in accordance with surgical guidelines and ASTM F543 standard testing protocols. Pullout tests were conducted with Instron 3300 testing frame. Load versus displacement values were recorded and maximum pullout loads were stated. The dual lead dual cored pedicle screw with poly-methyl methacrylate augmentation exhibited the highest pullout values, while dual lead dual cored pedicle screw demonstrated similar pullout strength as cannulated pedicle screw and normal pedicle screw with poly-methyl methacrylate augmentation. The dual lead dual cored pedicle screw with poly-methyl methacrylate augmentation can be used for osteoporotic and/or severe osteoporotic patients according to its promising results on animal cadaver and synthetic foams. © IMechE 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pedicle screw; cannulated screw; cement augmentation; dual lead dual cored pedicle screw; pullout strength

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26503840     DOI: 10.1177/0954411915612494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Cement augmentation of pedicle screws : Pros and cons].

Authors:  K J Schnake; T R Blattert; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Replacement of Destructive Pull-out Test with Modal Analysis in Primary Fixation Stability Assessment of Spinal Pedicle Screw.

Authors:  Mohammadjavad Einafshar; Ata Hashemi; Gerrit Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-02

3.  Testing Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Using Synthetic Bone Models: Is a Bilayer Foam Model a Better Representation of Vertebra?

Authors:  Vicky Varghese; Venkatesh Krishnan; Gurunathan Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-06-04

4.  Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Ravi Khatri; Vicky Varghese; Sunil Sharma; Gurunathan Saravana Kumar; Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-06-03

5.  Clinical Effects and Complications of Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Bone Cement: Comparison of Fenestrated Screw Augmentation and Vertebroplasty Augmentation.

Authors:  Jin Hak Kim; Dong Ki Ahn; Won Shik Shin; Myung Jin Kim; Ho Young Lee; Young Rok Go
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-14

6.  Effects of the Insertion Type and Depth on the Pedicle Screw Pullout Strength: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  K Jendoubi; Y Khadri; M Bendjaballah; N Slimane
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 1.781

7.  The Biomechanical Properties of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Spines.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Lei Yang; Chunde Li; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.