| Literature DB >> 26502900 |
Mercedes Serrano1, Víctor de Diego2, Jordi Muchart3, Daniel Cuadras4, Ana Felipe5, Alfons Macaya5, Ramón Velázquez6, M Pilar Poo2, Carmen Fons2, M Mar O'Callaghan2, Angels García-Cazorla2, Cristina Boix2, Bernabé Robles7, Francisco Carratalá8, Marisa Girós9, Paz Briones9, Laura Gort9, Rafael Artuch10, Celia Pérez-Cerdá11, Jaak Jaeken12, Belén Pérez11, Belén Pérez-Dueñas2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phosphomannomutase deficiency (PMM2-CDG) is the most frequent congenital disorder of glycosylation. The cerebellum is nearly always affected in PMM2-CDG patients, a cerebellar atrophy progression is observed, and cerebellar dysfunction is their main daily functional limitation. Different therapeutic agents are under development, and clinical evaluation of drug candidates will require a standardized score of cerebellar dysfunction. We aim to assess the validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) in children and adolescents with genetically confirmed PMM2-CDG deficiency. We compare ICARS results with the Nijmegen Pediatric CDG Rating Scale (NPCRS), neuroimaging, intelligence quotient (IQ) and molecular data.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26502900 PMCID: PMC4623922 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-015-0358-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1Midsagittal vermis relative diameter (MVRD). Legend: Midsagittal vermis relative diameter (MVRD) was calculated using a midsagittal section and measuring total posterior cranial fossa diameter (a linear segment from the posterior commissura to the occipital bone at the foramen magnum) and the largest axial diameter of the cerebellum parallel to the previous linear segment. The fraction (cerebellum diameter/total posterior cranial fossa diameter) is used to express the proportion of both values: . The image represents MVRD calculation of patient 5, with a MVRD result of 49 %
Molecular findings and multiorgan characteristics
| Patient/Sex | 1 Male | 2 Female | 3 Female | 4 Male | 5 Male | 6 Female | 7 Female | 8 Male | 9 Female | 10 Female | 11 Female | 12 Female | 13 Male |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular findings | p.E93A/p.R141H | p.R123Q/p.C241S | p.F157S/p.C241S | p.L32R/p.R141H | p.R162W/c.523 + 3A > G | p.F157S/p.R162W | p.P113L/p.D209G | p.C241S/p.R141H | p.T237M/c.640-9 T > G | p.P113L/c.353C > T + c.550C > A | p.R123X/p.I153T | p.P113L/p.P113L | p.E139K/ p.E139K |
| Age at evaluation/age at onset | 15 years/21 months | 6 years/9 months | 8 years/8 months | 7 years/Newborn | 10 years/3 months | 10 years/8 months | 11 years/Newborn | 5 years/2.5 years | 11 years/8 months | 8 years/7 months | 16 years/Newborn | 6 years/3 months | 11 years/ Newborn |
| Dysmorphic features | Large normal setting ears | Almond slanted eyes | No | Anteverted ears | Inverted nipples | Lipodystrophy | Almond slanted eyes, lipodystrophy | No | Almond slanted eyes | Almond slanted eyes, low anteverted ears, lipodystrophy | Almond slanted eyes, thick lips, pronounced cheekbones, lipodystrophy | Almond slanted eyes, broad face, large mouth, lipodystrophy, | Almond slanted eyes, broad face, large mouth, lipodystrophy |
| Cardiac involvement | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | PDA | Truncus arteriosus |
| Digestive involvement | Diarrhea, hypoglycemia | No | No | Vomits | No | ↑ALT | ↑ALT, AST (only perinatal period) | No | ↑ALT, AST | Growth failure, hypoglycemia | Vomits, growth failure, diarrhea | ↑ALT, AST | Failure to drive |
| Coagulation | ↓ AT-III, PC | ↓ AT-III, PC, PS | ↓ AT-III, PC | ↓ AT-III, PC | Normal | ↑ PT; ↓AT-III, PS | ↓ PC, PS | No | ↓FXI | ↑PT, aPTT, | ↓ aPTT | ↓ AT-III | ↑PT |
| ↓AT-III, PC, PS | |||||||||||||
| Endocrine involvement | No | No | No | No | No | No | Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism | No | No | Mild ↑TSH, hypoglycemia | Delayed puberty | ND | No |
| Kidney involvement | Nephro calcinosis | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | ↑Echogenicity, nephrolithiasis | Proteinuria | No | No |
| Eye abnormalities | Strabismus, pigmentary retinopathy | Strabismus upgaze deviation | Strabismus | Strabismus, hypermetropia, astigmatism | Strabismus, saccadic movements hypermetropia | Strabismus, hypermetropia | Strabismus, hypermetropia, astigmatism, abnormal ERG | No | Strabismus | Strabismus, upgaze deviation, saccadic movements | Strabismus, upgaze deviation, retinopathy, hypermetropia | Strabismus, hypermetropia | Strabismus |
PDA Persistent ductus arteriosus, ALT Alanine transaminase, AST Aspartate transaminase, ↑ Increased values, ↓ Decreased values, AT-III Antithrombin III, PC Protein C, PS Protein S, FXI Coagulation factor XI, aPTT Activated partial thromboplastin time, FIX Coagulation factor IX, PT Prothrombin time, ND No data available, TSH Thyroid stimulating hormone
Molecular findings and neurological evaluation (neuroimaging, IQ, NPCRS and ICARS results)
| Patient/Sex | 1 Male | 2 Female | 3 Female | 4 Male | 5 Male | 6 Female | 7 Female | 8 Male | 9 Female | 10 Female | 11 Female | 12 Female | 13 Male |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular findings | p.E93A/p.R141H | p.R123Q/p.C241S | p.F157S/p.C241S | p.L32R/p.R141H | p.R162W/c.523 + 3A > G | p.F157S/p.R162W | p.P113L/p.D209G | p.C241S/p.R141H | p.T237M/c.640-9 T > G | p.P113L/c.353C > T + c.550C > A | p.R123X/p.I153T | p.P113L/p.P113L | p.E139K/p.E139K |
| Age at evaluation | 15 years | 6 years | 8 years | 7 years | 10 years | 10 years | 11 years | 5 years | 11 years | 8 years | 16 years | 6 years | 11 years |
| Peripheral neuropathy | Motor-sensory axonal neuropathy | No NC/↓DTR | No NC/↓DTR | No | No NC/↓DTR | Slow nerve conduction | No | No NC/↓DTR | No NC/↓DTR | Slow nerve conduction velocity | Slow nerve conduction velocity | No NC/↓DTR | No NC/↓DTR |
| Epilepsy | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Psychometric evaluation | IQ 91 (WISC-IV) | ND | IQ 89 (WISC-IV) | ND | IQ 78 (K-BIT) | IQ 59 (WISC-IV) | ND | ND | ND | IQ 66 (K-BIT) | IQ 40 (K-BIT) | ND | ND |
| MRI findings | Mild prominence cerebellar folia | Cerebellar vermis atrophy | Global cerebellar atrophy | ND | Global cerebellar atrophy | Global cerebellar atrophy | Global cerebellar atrophy | Global cerebellar atrophy | Cerebellar vermis atrophy | Global cerebellar atrophy, juxtacortical signal change | Global cerebellar atrophy with pons atrophy | Global cerebellar atrophy | Global cerebellar and pons atrophy, ventricular enlargement |
| MRI MVRD | 67 % | 46 % | No recent MRIa | No recent MRIa | 49 % | 46 % | 35 % | No recent MRIa | No recent MRIa | 35 % | 29 % | 36 % | 28 % |
| NPCRS | 6 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 22 | 16 | 27 |
| ICARS | 4 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 23 | 34 | 47 | 50 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 70 | 79 |
NC Nerve conduction studies, DTR Deep tendon reflexes, IQ Intelligence quotient, WISC-IV Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth edition, K-BIT Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second edition, MVRD midsagittal vermis relative diameter, NPCRS Nijmegen Pediatric CDG Rating Score, ICARS International Cerebellar Assessment Rating Scale
aSee criteria in the text to include MRI in the analysis
Fig. 2ICARS results in patients versus control subjects, and correlations with NPCRS, neuroimaging and IQ findings. Legends: a ICARS: Patients’ mean 41.1 vs Controls’ mean 1.3 (p < 0.01); Postural-gait subscore: Patients’ mean 15.3 vs Controls’ mean 0.4 (p < 0.01); Kinetic subscore: Patients’ mean 20.2 vs Controls’ mean 0.8 (p < 0.01); Dysarthria subscore: Patients’ mean 3.5 vs Controls’ mean 0.1 (p < 0.01); Oculomotor subscore: Patients’ mean 1.7 vs Controls’ mean 0.1 (p < 0.01). b ICARS was statistically correlated with NPCRS with a positive coefficient of correlation (rs 0,90, p < 0.001). Regarding NPCRS sections, ICARS was correlated with Section I (Current Function) (rs 0.92, p = 0.001), and Section III (Current Clinical Assessment) (rs 0.88, p < 0.001) but not with Section II (System Specific Involvement) (rs 0.35, p = 0.27). c ICARS is negatively correlated with midsagittal vermis relative diameter (rs −0.87, p = 0.003). d There is a negative correlation between ICARS and intelligence quotient (rs −0.94, p = 0.005)
Fig. 3ICARS and neuroimaging findings