| Literature DB >> 26502415 |
Marvin K Smith1, Bryson Lesniak2, Michael G Baraga1, Lee Kaplan1, Jean Jose3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided aspiration, fenestration, and injection as a treatment in patients with symptomatic popliteal cysts. HYPOTHESIS: Ultrasound-guided aspiration, fenestration, and injection (UGAFI) is an effective and safe treatment option for symptomatic popliteal cysts. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Baker cyst; cyst aspiration; knee; musculoskeletal ultrasound; osteoarthritis; pain management; popliteal cyst; ultrasound-guided
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26502415 PMCID: PMC4547114 DOI: 10.1177/1941738115585520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Health ISSN: 1941-0921 Impact factor: 3.843
Figure 1.(a) Axial, proton density, fat-suppressed magnetic resonance image (MRI) and (b) axial ultrasound image of the same patient. Both images demonstrate a large mildly complex popliteal (Baker) cyst (calipers), with internal septations (arrows), extending posteriorly between the medial head of the gastrocnemius (curved arrow) and the semimembranosus tendon (chevron). Note: the patient was positioned (A) supine for MRI and (B) prone for ultrasound.
Figure 2.Axial ultrasound images of the patient in Figure 1. (a) Large popliteal cyst extending posteriorly between the medial head of the gastrocnemius (curved arrow) and the semimembranosus tendons (straight arrow). (b) Ultrasound-guided needle placement into the cyst (straight arrow). Note the echogenic internal synovitis (chevron). (c) Ultrasound-guided aspiration of cyst content, resulting in decompression of the cyst walls.
Figure 3.Representative photograph showing the probe and needle position during the procedure. The transducer is placed in the anatomic axial plane and the needle introduced from a posteromedial approach using the “in-plane” technique. A “wider footprint” transducer is preferable, as it allows visualization of both the popliteal neurovascular bundle and needle during the procedure, thereby decreasing the chance of injury.
Patient characteristics
| Patient population (n) | 47 |
| Sex, n | |
| Male | 10 |
| Female | 37 |
| Age, y, mean (range) | 55.6 (29-91) |
| Follow-up, wk, mean (range) | 90.2 (4.86-155.71) |
| Follow-up, wk, median | 106.6 |
Knee and cyst characteristics
| Number of patients | 47 |
| Number of cysts | 48[ |
| Cyst size, cm, mean (range) | 3.38 (1.2-7.1)[ |
| Complex cysts | 15 |
| Wall thickening | 8[ |
| Internal septations | 6[ |
| Echogenic bodies | 3[ |
| Rupture | 2[ |
| Internal synovitis | 2[ |
| Intra-articular disorders | 35 of 48 |
| OA | 20[ |
| Tricompartmental OA | 9 of 20[ |
| Medial meniscal tear | 13[ |
| Lateral meniscal tear | 10[ |
| Patellar chondromalacia | 5[ |
| Patellar subluxation/tilt | 3[ |
| Intra-articular body | 2[ |
| Chronic ACL tear | 1[ |
| Sclerosis | 1[ |
| Prior surgery | 5 |
| Arthroscopic meniscectomy | 4 |
| ACL reconstruction | 1 |
ACL, anterior cruciate ligmant; OA, osteoarthritis.
One patient diagnosed with bilateral popliteal cysts and received bilateral aspirations.
Mean cyst size determined by the longest dimension found on ultrasound in any plane.
Individual cysts often contained multiple characteristics. Each characteristic is reported separately.
Individual knees often contained multiple disorders. Each intra-articular disorder is reported separately.
WOMAC and Outcome Data[]
| PA WOMAC | FFU WOMAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total scale | 48.55 | 17.15 | <0.0001 |
| Subscales | |||
| Pain | 10.68 | 3.94 | <0.0001 |
| Stiffness | 4.51 | 1.77 | <0.0001 |
| Function | 31.34 | 12.17 | <0.0001 |
| Total | Percentage | ||
| Recurrence[ | 6 | 12.7 | |
| Complications | 0 | 0.0 | |
FFU, final follow-up; PA, preaspiration; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
WOMAC score represents mean of study population.
P values were obtained using the Student t test; P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Recurrence defined as reaccumulation of cyst requiring reaspiration.